![]() |
Number portability issues?
We have filed CLEC status. Our portability issues will be the same as any other provider. There are always limits on that, but were working, as I'm sure you are to make the portability the smoothest it can be. |
Beta tested this and it is simply amazing.
Chris, how about that phone ;) Coin |
On the 911 issue why dont they simply change over the caller id system. Make the address show up right in the caller id information, and make it encrypted and only a special caller id unit cant decrypt it. That combined with some sort of a routing system which directs the call due to the area code of the address to the proper 911 call center. *shrugs*
|
Thats a good Idea Sticky.
Turn the ID into a hash, then only authorized units can get the address portion of it... but all units can get the number portion. Coin: Phone boxed up and ready to be shipped to you monday. Look for it in the mail. Now with regards to the E911 issues... One important, very important thing to note: the FCC mandates something that simply isn't technically possible, and that is: "E911 coverage for all VoIP subscribers". The reason this isn't feasible, or possible, is that the routing of an 'enhanced' or "E911 call is handled very differently than a landline 9-1-1 call. That means that no one in the US is currently meeting the intent of the FCC's regulations. We made a very nice and juicy deal with our upstreams providers, that makes us E911 compliant also, since we are using their US48 national network, do to answer your question, yes - we are E911 compliant. |
Quote:
|
Morning bumpage. :winkwink:
|
Monday bump :thumbsup :thumbsup
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123