![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know you were saying " the way I 'thought' it should be ". That is all you ever do ( no links, no backup, just your low thinking opinions ), but still claim people have no info ... and are idiots... For the rest of your post, I am awaiting translation from professionals ... BTW, where did I mention Bush... or even hinted ?You have a real fixation .. of defending him , even when not attacked .. Does he really need all that defense ? seems like it according to your responses. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyone that supports Bush is a retard. Even many republicans no longer support him. I guess they are retards to you too? |
Quote:
Voters dont know their own parties TRUE politics. ask a person why they vote they way they do. a repub or a demo will say "because they represent me." ok. can you honestly say the republicans represent the majority of people in this country that voted for them? http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature.../index_np.html taken from motley fool http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06031404.htm The median net worth of the bottom 40% of families declined, while those at the top experienced gains in their net worth. Want specifics? The average family's income fell 2.3%, from $72,400 in the 1998-2001 period to $70,700 in the 2001-2004 period (adjusted for inflation). Part of this can be attributed to the stock market's slump during the period. During the boom years of 1998 to 2001, average income soared by 17.3%. Another factor is a 6.2% decline in median real wages. Note that average numbers can be misleading, if some extreme numbers at the top or bottom skew things, so it's often good to look at median numbers, which represent the middle of the batch. In this case, median income rose a bit -- up 1.6% to $43,200. Meanwhile, fewer families are investing in stocks, which doesn't bode well for their long-term fiscal health. The percentage of families investing in stocks fell from 51.9% to 48.6%. Median net worth rose just 1.5%, to $93,100, between 2001 and 2004, versus a pop of 10.3% in the previous three years and a 17.4% increase in the three years before that. Meanwhile, mortgage debt increased significantly on account of the continued housing boom of recent years. (Home prices surged almost 27% during the period, and the ranks of homeowners rose to 69.1% of the population. Overall household debt jumped a whopping 33.9% to a median value of $55,300. Not surprisingly, the portion of household income devoted to paying off debts rose to 14.4% from 12.9%. Do you get the picture? Many Americans are not doing as well as they may appear. because they vote DUMB. Quote:
|
Quote:
and you call gatorb a retard? please read a financial. http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06031404.htm |
The "strong US economy" is a joke created by deflating the crap out of the currency until it becomes too expensive to import things, which promotes your in economy manufacturing. If you adjust the US economy dollars from Clinton era and current numbers in $$$ to value of things like Yen, Euros, or other major currencies, you will find that things have dropped remarkably.
Unless the economy is doing 25% better today than 5 years ago, the net net net isn't very good. It is painful to watch. Alex |
Quote:
|
If Roe v. Wade gets overturned, I am buying stock in the companies that make coat hangers.
|
Quote:
Who the fuck are you? |
The original premise of this discussion was to get people to suggest how we, as a society, will handle or legislate if a woman becomes pregnant and abortion becomes either state controlled or totally banned..not whether
Bush is an idiot... Before abortion was legalised, men were not held accountable, women died or abandoned babies on church steps.....orphanages overflowed... So. If there is no abortion, what steps are needed..so we do not repeat our own barbaric history? |
Quote:
http://www.irregulartimes.com/civ6.jpg http://www.irregulartimes.com/civ4.jpg http://www.irregulartimes.com/civ13.jpg http://www.robert-fisk.com/46e7ef90.jpg http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraq3_2apr2003.jpg |
I see you are making a statement here, but what do these images have to do with the question about abortion....
|
what will happen is rich girls will still get them and poor girls will go to back alleys and many will die .Thats what happened before.
|
Quote:
Because these same pricks that claim to be so much into saving babies are the same ones that backed Bush on the war and still continue to do so. As far as I'm concerned the bloods on their hands. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123