GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Ok - so now who is still working with met-art? hmmmm???

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Ok - so now who is still working with met-art? hmmmm??? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=586387)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thumbler

It's also the name of a classic book........ and *in the correct context* isn't a problem. As Alex (I think) said the other day - the context is key

from ACACP site

asacp.org/CodeOfEthics.html

It is unacceptable to use meta tags, any search engine keywords or text that denote child pornography, such as, but not limited to: kiddie, child, pre-teen or any form of Lolita, etc.

Unacceptable Words (will be searched for in 20 languages.*)

asacp.org/list.html

English

adolescent
child
child porn
child sex
children
kiddie
kiddie porn
kiddie sex
lolitas
minor
minors
pedoland
pedophile
pedophilia
pre-teen
pre-teen porn
pre-teen sex
teen13-17
underaged
4teen
6teen
7teen
adolescent
child porn
child sex
child pornography
childporn
childsex
lolita
forteen
illegal lolitas
juvenile
kid porn
kiddie
kiddie porn
kiddie sex
kiddieporn
kiddiesex
kinderporn
kindersex
koprofgie
kotoran
lolita
lolitas
lolitaz
minors
paedophilia
paidophilia
pdophile
pdophilie
pederastia
pediphile
pedofilia sex
pedophelia
pedophilia
pedophilia pictures
pedophylia
pre teen
pre teenage
pre teenager
pre teenagers
pre teens
pre-adolescent
preeteen
prelolitas
pre-teen
sex with children
sex with minors
sixteen
teen 13
teen 14
teen 15
teen 16
teen 17
under age
underage

* Licensed to ASACP by Sex.Com for the exclusive use in fighting child pornography only.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantchixx

I have been telling you people for almost a year now that they have children in their 1999-2001 archives but nobody fucking listened. When someone from MET denied it I offered to show him where it was just tog ive the benefit of the doubt that maybe he didn;t realize it was still there but he became hush hush and that was it. He claimed he couldnt see it in his LOCALY archived site files so I offered to show it to him on the site itself if he would just provide a temporary pass.

While the images are not CP the images are children regardless.

Porn and children don't mix.. so I stay away from them. I suggest you all do as well until the images are removed unless you like mixing children with porn promotions.

I was a met-art member a couple of years ago and was surprised to find video content of nudists that appeared to be under 18. It's no longer there as far as I can see.

On its own this type of content is obviously not illegal, however given that it's encompassed within a site that is promoted by adult webmasters I do think that at the least it's unethical and pretty stupid to boot. I guess that's why it's gone now.

And how about a book?

amazon.com/gp/product/393402016X/

Should they ban Hegre too? Maybe someone should get Amazon to court for selling this? I find the pics that were posted from that brazilian book distasteful too, the kids look VERY young to be associated to an adult/sex context. However if the book doesn't actually have porn inside (which I suspect might be the case) don't see no problem if it was sold in an art shop. This things must be judged case by case, situation by situation, not in general terms.

And "teens"? That's a pretty borderline term also (afterall people are underage during the most of their teens). Should one go after all the "teen" sites too?

Hegre is not a saint also...

will I get an answer for my question?
I understand why - Jeffrey J. Douglas does not answer - does not want to
renew this topic
But Corvette ?
I know you are a decent man !
gfy are waiting for the answer...