Fiddy sick pedo's.

Very true.

Hear, hear!

Other than the fact that it is legal? Please dont bring morals in here. You push porn. As long as its leagal and makes YOU money im sure you dont care.

if it's legal and it will make you money, go for it

I think CCBILL have an issue with 16 year olds.

I'd say go with Verotell but they have problems with 12 year olds and older.

I'd say dont do it

Even though its safe to say if she wants to show the world her ass in thongs and other normal 'non nude' bullshit shes probably a little slut anyway, so its not like you'd be corrupting an innocent girl.

I say no just for your own reputation, do you really wanna be the guy who cashed in on borderline child porn (even though any adult who says theyve never seen a 16 year old they wanna bang is full of shit), they'll still pretend theyre above you and drive your reputation into the ground.

Out of curosity, do underage NN sites do a lot of sales??? I'd think this is something the average person wouldnt want to give his credit card info for. But maybe im wrong.

How does it feel to pimp your daughter to the pedo's ? Is the money ok?

Yeah. You make a lot of scence. I've decided not to go ahead with it. It would be like treading on egg shells. I'll stick with the 18+ girls and give her a call in a couple of years time.

Thanks to everybody for their input in this tread. Itg has opened my eyes to a few things.

Cheers all, and good night!!

Leroy

I'm sure that www.christinamodel.com has made more than it's share of money... and that site was up well before her 18th birthday.

And despite my making a case for why it is ok to make the site, I still recommend not doing it because solo girls are flaky as hell when they're mature. A 16 year old that will devote herself to something for years is very rare to come by.

How in the fuck does modeling for outwear catalogues and prom dresses end up being material for pedos? You sir are the sick fuck who can't delineate between porn and anything else. Do you whack off to your Abercrombie catalogue?

That's the real argument and the point i made in my first reply. It's just a big PITA.

i didnt get the catalogue part. My bad.

And therein lies a perfect example of the problem still prevalent in this industry. Because some sells erotic material it is somehow presupposed that they have no morals. So many people are completely programmed to think of sexuality as immoral that they can't magine a caring, honest person who also happens to enjoy sex. Yet a person could be considered of the highest moral fiber and produce movies like The Godfather or any other of thousands of films that make hurting people somehow glorious.

No doubt there are a bunch of scummy people "pushing porn" but I'd argue that it's people's really whacked out sense of how sex is somehow wrong that perpetuates that type of expression of it.

Oh my god - there's a lot of content producers/photographers in this thread LOL

Everybody and their mommas have dealt with 16 yr old models.

Yah I wasn't saying I had an NN site up for her. I dodn't even talk about it on any boards anything related to adult. It's just a modeling portfolio she used to get an agency and then regular old modeling work and hopefully some acting jobs. Lord knows she can sure act it up when she freaking wants to whine about somet drama so she might as well get an Oscar for it. =]

Leroy, are you talking about who I think you are talking about?

I don't fucking beleive this.

well good luck to her :thumbsup

Who?

...

He said it was for a NN solo girl site. Sorry, but NN is still "porn" in my book. The point is to sexually arouse a customer and make them buy a membership.


Some of you people make me fucking sick.

You might as well give up trying to discuss it in here...

You still have those who think anyone who looks at a person that's under 18 is a, "pedo"

And when you say, "non-nude", it's assumed that she'll be taking everything off but a little bit to hide the nipples and crotch..

If she wants a site to show an online portfolio of sorts that has her in blue jeans, coats, dresses, etc. .. Not a thing wrong with it... Just watch that the contact info is in a guy's name; going to a guy's place..

AND TO ALL WHO KEEP YELLING PEDO... Pedophilia : A psychosexual disorder in which an adult's arousal and sexual gratification occur primarily through sexual contact with prepubescent children.

When will you people ever get it?????????????????

:thumbsup :thumbsup

Ok, I have ONE QUESTION then. Where will this site be promoted?

Will i strickly be used to submit to modeling/telent agencies. Or will it be promoted on adult TGPs/freesites/babeblogs/etc.

The answer to this question ultimatly decides if this site will be "right or wrong".

Agreed....

You know, I've always learned that these are the people who have these thoughts themselves. Maybe they're upset that they can't stop thinking about it. Maybe it's guilt. The ones that scream the loudest and angriest about it.

your just asking for trouble...

Okay, a couple of things:

1 - the 16 year old cannot legally enter into the contract, her parents would have to sign for it. So there is always an issue here.
2 - non-nude under 18 models, while legal, are a very very bullshit way to make money. You know you are playing to pedos at that point without a doubt, no normal person will pay money to see a 16 year old standing around in tight jeans and crop tops.
3 - In the UK, many of the models that appear topless in the newspapers (Page 3 girls) in the past have been under 18. It wasn't illegal.

Non-nude for me has always been a CP keyword, and I really don't like promoting any of those sites, even if the model is over 18. Most of the sites i have seen with over 18 models often specifically don't mention the model's age, attempting to play the "she is so young she won't get naked" card, playing to the people in point 2 above.

As Mark said, just because we are porn people don't mean that we cannot have morals.

Alex

Read this and take it in... Its from www.adultweblaw.com


5. United States v Knox:

In Knox, a man who had previously been convicted of receiving child pornography through the mail ordered video tapes (by mail) of girls between the ages of ten and seventeen who, in the Court's words, "were dancing or gyrating in a fashion not natural for their age." The girls wore bikini bathing suits, leotards, or underwear - none of the girls in the videos was nude. The videos were set to music, and it appeared that someone off-camera was directing the girls. The photographer videotaped the girls dancing, and zoomed in on each girl's pubic area for an extended period of time. Knox was prosecuted under United States Child Pornography laws.

Legal counsel for Knox argued that "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" meant that the girls had to be nude - wearing clothing meant that that genitals and pubic area were clearly not exhibited. The Court disagreed and held that there was no nudity requirement in the statute: "the statutory term "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area," as used in 18 U.S.C. hahaha167; 2256(2)(E), does not contain any requirement that the child subject's genitals or pubic area be fully or partially exposed or discernible through his or her opaque clothing."

She's too young. Look for girls at legal age instead. :)

Run Like Hell

I would stay away till she is 18...

I do have one question... How old was Pechez when she started? 16? 17? or was this a ploy to intise ppl to join...

Many times, those who do scream the loudest are those who want to make sure they aren't suspected.. "If I object loud enough, they won't think I'm one of em."

Not all.. but many..

and again.. If it's just a g-rated portfolio .. not a problem.. but I do wonder why there'd be a membership requirement for such.. No money to be made with that..

tell her to go back to school. she'll serve more purpose with the entire soccer team

:pimp I Don't Know About The Uk And Shit..but In America You Would Get Rich! They Would Plaster Your Face All Over The News And Shit...all Kinds Of Publicity For Doing Some Stupid Shit Like That... But Its Legal Though! The funny part of this story is that 16 year old girl didn't just walk up to you and ask... be for real! you fuckin her you perverted child molester!

WOW, I'm sure that I could sell the hell outta her, she's smokin'. Is there an affiliate program ?

wait til she's 35 and make a MILF site. :)

I'm just curious why people are saying 16 is a prepubescent child? That is the age of consent for sex in many states, like Washington where I'm from, and it's the age when everyone is allowed to weild a deadly weapon - a car.

I had had sex by 16 and I think most have.

Nice logic there, man!

there are mainstream photographers who charge for access to their work and it includes under 18 people, but it's all non-nude. how is this any different???

I would not even bring this one publicly that's an outrage

I predict a 50 pager frm this one :)

I think it's better to wait until she turns 18... leave her alone until then if u don't want to get into trouble...

I recommend giving hands from there until she is 18

I tip my hat to the few people who could affer advice/opinions OBJECTIVELY in this thread, to the rast of you that porn han so deeply corrupted your minds ....

Its no tworth my time .... nevermind

thread useless without her picture... we'll judge her viability, then.

good luck .. but maybe too young?!

I totally agree with that.:thumbsup

Fucking sigwhore idiot.

Idiots, pedo's don't like 16 year olds, well at least no more or less than i do. Pedo's like children who look like children. Most 16 yr olds nowadays don't look like children.