DaddyHalbucks |
03-10-2006 10:25 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by V_RocKs
You were 100% accurate on this one, Donny!
I was agreeing with you on page 1 and didn't click the link yet... I click the link and see that it is as you fortold.. Good work
To the seller, you are high man!
There is a BIG difference between dirtbike.com and californiacoeds.com...
One is instantly brandable in mainstream markets... Newspaper, TV, radio... The other is not. So it is not worth more than $2000 tops...
|
180 degrees --wrong.
Descriptive phrases domains like "dirt bike" are the exact definition of what is NOT brandable. You are confusing "descriptive" and "distinctive." The USPTO would be very hard pressed to grant a company a TM for "automobile." Yet, "Toyota" is trademarked.
Do you really think that only the owner of that "dirtbike.com" domain (and not the other 100,000 bike and sports shops across the world who have been using it continuously for the last 20 years) would be allowed the exclusive use of the "brand" called "DIRT BIKE?!" What are ya smokin there, Brother?
To completely contradict you, not only is "California Coeds" potentially brandable, it is also alliterative, a big plus.
Now, the kicker. What are you gonna sell on "DirtBike.com?" Check out the site, it is obvious THEY have no clue. It's only a cookie cutter PPC web site. LOL.
Are you gonna invent a StarTrek like machine that allows surfers to download a dirt bike over the internet?
Downloading softcore porn images of frolicking coeds on the California beach has no such technological limitation.
;)
|