Google Image Search Losoes against perfect 10 - GoFuckYourself.com

Xenophage · 02-22-2006, 09:37 AM

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...lines-business

very interesting article about how and what copyrighted information you can store, and make money off of.

Google in particular has tiptoed the line separating the "fair use" of copyrighted material and copyright infringement. The Internet giant has sometimes upset copyright holders, most recently getting sued by book publishers for making digital copies of books.

Matz's ruling "narrows the concept of fair use for search engines, but it also points out how variable that doctrine is and how little certainty a company has in relying on it," Pulgram said. "Google did what everyone thought was legal."

King Porn · 02-22-2006, 09:42 AM

Doesn't Perfect 10 know how to use robots.txt to block Googlebot?
http://www.google.com/webmasters/remove.html

FredIsMe · 02-22-2006, 09:45 AM

old news

GatorB · 02-22-2006, 09:46 AM

Google will win on appeal. No ads are on their image search. Only problem with google image search is the you can see the full size pics without having to be on the page it came from. Google can easily fix that.

Anyways yahoo video search is a bigger threat to copyright infringement. You can download a video without have to see the page where it came from.

Of course if sites like Perfect 10 would use a little hotlinking protection this shit doesn't happen in the first place.

ssp · 02-22-2006, 09:50 AM

It's all a publicity stunt.

02-22-2006, 09:37 AM	#1
Xenophage Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 12,122	Google Image Search Losoes against perfect 10 http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...lines-business very interesting article about how and what copyrighted information you can store, and make money off of. Google in particular has tiptoed the line separating the "fair use" of copyrighted material and copyright infringement. The Internet giant has sometimes upset copyright holders, most recently getting sued by book publishers for making digital copies of books. Matz's ruling "narrows the concept of fair use for search engines, but it also points out how variable that doctrine is and how little certainty a company has in relying on it," Pulgram said. "Google did what everyone thought was legal."

02-22-2006, 09:42 AM	#2
King Porn Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 245	Doesn't Perfect 10 know how to use robots.txt to block Googlebot? http://www.google.com/webmasters/remove.html __________________ Hot Porn Sites --> Submit your website now for free targeted traffic! Topbucks --> Earn $40 per signup or 80% revshare! Sign up now & promote over 60 niches with 300+ quality tours that convert big!

02-22-2006, 09:45 AM	#3
FredIsMe So Fucking Banned Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Livin' in America Posts: 2,406	old news

02-22-2006, 09:46 AM	#4
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	Google will win on appeal. No ads are on their image search. Only problem with google image search is the you can see the full size pics without having to be on the page it came from. Google can easily fix that. Anyways yahoo video search is a bigger threat to copyright infringement. You can download a video without have to see the page where it came from. Of course if sites like Perfect 10 would use a little hotlinking protection this shit doesn't happen in the first place.

02-22-2006, 09:50 AM	#5
ssp Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 7,990	It's all a publicity stunt.