Shes fucking ugly as hell. :2 cents:

Although I didn't think he was an ass (persay) for posting the pvt. chat, I initially thought it was a bit tactless.

But as I read through it, I realized it was conducted very smooth, professional and diplomatic.

Models must be made from the onset to realize and understand that their photos will become part of the permanent online fabric and can never be withdrawn from public once published. What they consider to be 'fun and games'...is an investment and livelihood for many of us.

Sure, we can offer to sell them the copyrights to the images if we choose, but the reality is they likely couldn't afford it once all the factors are weighed in.

I think Dugmor did a good job of illustrating how to be calm, cool and professional under the circumstances.

Ones we had the same story! It was 40k contract with the 2 girls. And at the last day (shooting day) one pf them cancels the contract and tell us that she newer shoot again! Fuck:warning

yeah a true pro idiot! my advice is for girls to sign a clause that allows a content removal after 2 years, if not look elsewhere

Thought this one out fully, huh?

Thats borderline extortion, consult with a lawyer before you do that :2 cents:

dugmore dug more of fuck all, and thats all, shes not even a stable re-appearing model,
__________________________________________________ ________________
shrewd buisnessmen have no friends in life, only paid for presence collegues
and are people that are chronicaly boring to be around and bored as fuck
and get wrinkles early.

It wouldn't be extortion if you're offering to sell them the copyrights for 5x the price they were paid to model for them.

You own the copyrights - you can ask whatever you want.

If this becomes a repeat problem for a photographer, I'd be tempted to include a clause in the original modeling contract stating either:

1. Photos can't be removed from publication or circulation under any request or circumstances.

or

2. Copyrights to images would only be sold at X times the amount paid to model at time of production.

That said, its always best to consult with a lawyer who's knowledgeable about such matters. There's no replacement for good sound legal advice.

Souls? What souls?
Money is money. I'm sure she's on tons of servers.

actually no i just did now though, but nonetheless content should be removed on certain occasions that i will not get into here. There are definately
speclal cases though, and after deep analysis i found her reasons to actually be childish and unworthy of serious consideration unfortunatly. nonetheless my human rights advocacy has me on reactive mode! And regardless i dont see why after 2 or 3 years an expiery deal on broadcast couldnt be reached. This should be fully discussed on contract sign ups so that its fare, and everyone is happy.

yeah SOULS! YOU KNOW! the ones you are possesed by and control
your body! moron!..

anyways i know her reasons are poor but if she wants to end broAdcast its her choice maybe the reasons are more problemetic than shes really saying and its worth taking down.

just let her go

this business is not for the faint-hearted, anyway