The Most Controversial Documentary About 9/11 Airs On Australian Tv Network

dont they have the internet there ?

Most third world countries don't have the interweb. Australia is no exception.

oly one problem...they say that many are calling for the reopening of the investigation...


ummm yeah....I DONT THINK SO! they will never allow this

I'll bet the Aussie stores can't keep the tinfoil hats in stock.

Can the conspiracy theorists account for the people who died on flight 77 and the remains found and identified at the pentagon site?

When they do - could they please forward the information to the families of the people that died.

Thank you.

I got that video on my harddrive....very interesting indeed

Heard all this before, well before this show was made. And I live in Oz

Do you honestly believe that anything from Flight 77 have been found here in this rabbit hole?

The video is on TorrentSpy for those interested. I'm going to download it later and see what they have to say.

People honestly think this was a missle, or a rocket or.. what?

watch the video for some answers... or actually for more questions...

Heavy Sigh

there are mos def some convinceing arguements in the video,but i dont think this case will ever re open..

Maybe it was a planeload of midgets.

Where the can I get the video??

http://ts.searching.com/torrent/4876..._Directors_Cut

Where to get the video?
http://www.mininova.org/tor/34449
There are more torrents of the movie at mininova.org
You need bittorrent to download it.

August 13, 2004

From: NewsWithViews.com

A new 9-11 video was screened last night in Sacramento, California, leaving the audience stunned. '911 in Plane Site' is basically presented in two parts. The first segment is 52 minutes and designed for showing on television with the balance of a one hour time slot reserved for commercials. Part II continues with more film and analysis. This video is digitally mastered making details sharp and clear.

'911 in Plane Site' presents actual film from that fateful day and careful analysis focusing on the Pentagon and the two World Trade Center buildings. By slowing down the actual news feeds that day from networks like CNN, FOX, the BBC and others, what you see is quite different from what most people saw in "real time" that day. Live footage from the Pentagon and what was missed by most because of the smoke and confusion was captured up close by the media. Following the showing, a retired vet remarked, "How did we miss this all this time? I've seen media clips of the front of that building [the Pentagon] many times, but I wasn't really seeing what was there. I feel sick."

One particular interview that brought gasps from the audience and many looking around with shock etched on their faces was an interview conducted - live at the time - by FOX News. This intense interview with Mark Burnback, an employee of FOX News, contains the following narrative, paraphrased: Burnback was close to the path of the second plane and had a good long look at what he describes was not a commercial airliner. The plane that hit the second tower had no windows, Burnback was very clear about that. The plane had some kind of blue logo on the front near the nose and looked like a cargo plane. This point was driven to the viewer several times along with the comment from this FOX employee that "this plane wasn't from around here or anything you'd see take off from the airport."

Other footage includes several women who had a very clear view watching the second plane hit were yelling, "That wasn't American Airlines....It wasn't American Airlines going into the building." These interviews were played that morning once on FOX News, never to be replayed again, despite the massive saturation and repetition by the media for many days to come.

Other extremely disturbing segments of this video are the clear, slow motion shots of the second plane going into the towers which show a flash right before the nose of the plane hits the building and a pod attached to the bottom of the plane. This strange flash is clearly recorded from four different angles from four different cameras. While there is only one known piece of film showing the first plane hitting the first tower, in slow motion one can clearly see - as with the second plane - a flash from the nose section right before impact. What caused this?

This video raises extremely disturbing questions about the planes that hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Centers, but no conclusions or accusations are made by the commentator. To date, only one piece of film has been released by DoD of the front of the Pentagon. The question raised in the video is where is all the other film footage from the Pentagon? The heart beat of America's military and security, with a building and perimeter loaded with cameras, but no film for the public to view of events as they unfolded except from one camera?

According to the producers, the purpose of '911 in Plane Site' is to demonstrate that Americans saw one thing that morning that was so shocking, so horrific and so massive, the finer details weren't really being picked up. The producer reinforces to the viewer that after one broadcast of many very controversial interviews live on the spot, these particular interviews were never broadcast again, i.e. firefighters on the spot talking about the explosions and bombs inside the towers. Since 9-11, it has been reported that "Building Seven" collapsed because of the two World Trade Center towers collapsing. However, the footage on this video tells a different story and raises more questions.

'911 in Plane Site,' distributed by Power Hour Productions (866-773-9469), leaves one with many questions as demonstrated by a very upset senior citizen who requested her last name be withheld. Mary asked, "If these weren't commercial airliners, where are those flights? Where are the passengers? My, God what really happened that day?" Indeed, this seemed to be the biggest question expressed by viewers after the lights came back on, but for which there were no answers. Some viewers were visibly upset, angry and "want damn answers" from the Bush Administration. Others just walked out the door in silence. One upset man commented on the way out of the viewing, "It's time to get this on PBS and every investigative news program on TV. We need answers."

More drivel from Mr. bullsht.....

If you want to want something with some semblance of fact, and be entertained at the same time, try this new movie from A&E , "Flight 93"

A true story of some real heroes.....

http://www.aetv.com/flight_93/

downloading it

Scientists have modeled the plane hitting such a hard object like that would flow like a liquid into the building.


This accounts for why the damage was severe inside, and relatively little on the outside. The speed and path of the plane literally sucked itself inside of the Pentagon.


Who would you trust more, some theorists, or some scientists who modeled the crash based on physics?

Hello Mr. Brainwashed... now that you mentioned A&E be sure to watch Criss Angel's Mindfreak show... one of the greatest americans on TV... but you wouldn't understand him anyway...

I'd like to see it

The same scientists that wrote the biggest joke - 9-11 Commission report or some other "scientists" paid by the Bush gang?

Never even knew it was on or saw any ads for it. Channel ten too.. weird, thats strictly SBS stuff.

Irony:

You are quick to point out a finanicially motivated cover up in the arguement for a movie promoting a wild conspiracy that is making a ton of money.

Michael Moore already stole many kids money, these guys just want their share.

I'm surprised you even have electricity - how are the Amish coming along in Penn anyways? heheh

Hmm.. yeah, I thought that when a plane crashes into a building, it's supposed to leave a plane-shaped hole in the wall. I mean that's the way it works in the cartoons... shouldn't that happen in real life too? I'm sure there are people out there who have seen their fair share of planes crashing into walls who can back me up on this.

hey, i've had dialup for at least 6 months now!

When does Australia get the video of how we fake the moon landing? Oh and the cool alien autopsy thing?

Yeah right... The whole world deserves to know the truth behind the 9-11 attack. The good Mr. President and his company have mistakenly used that 9-11 attack to justify his so-called "war on terrorism".

Reminds me of Fahrenheit 9/11 documentary.

I believe several University Physicists produced similar results in computer modelling of the accident. The airplane flowed like a liquid into the building and spread out within the building.

Australia isn't a 3rd world country you fucking retard



It's a first world country, just like the country you live in...

Id like to put your sorry ass in a locked room with the families of the people who died on that plane.

Yeah, how'd the bodies get in there if it wasn't a plane?


If SOMEONE moved the bodies there, let's assume that for ONE moment.


Don't you think SOMEONE would've come forward with some evidence?


Someone who killed the passengers via a gas

Someone who transported them in vehicles, with luggage

Someone who planted the bodies

Someone who chopped them up

etc, etc, etc, etc, etc

Were there any remains recovered at the Pentagon of passangers?

If not... I don't doubt that people came up missing, but the possibility exists that something else happened to the actual plane than crashing into the Pentagon.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

Look you ignorant child.... who is CONSISTENTLY WRONG about everything. You don't know jack shit and your record on this board proves it. Pay attention to your own country of Bulgaria and stop your moronic commentary about a country you have never even visited.

And by the way retard, I saw the second plane fly into 2nd tower on LIVE television.. unless the Networks are helping Bush with his "conspiracy"

Questioning the truth doesn't hurt the families one bit, it's actually a sign of intelligence.

Nila Sagedevan, Commercial pilot and aeronautical engineer.
Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal, on the Republic
Broadcast Network
"The government wants us to believe that a person who couldn't even solo a small Cessna took over the
controls of a Boeing 757 jetliner and performed complicated maneuvers even myself or other experienced pilots
could have never performed.hahaha8221; "It's just not going to happen and, from my point of view, is impossible. If this was
fabricated by the government so was the rest of the 9/11 story."
"You mean to tell me, the supposed inexperienced 5'8" Arab terrorist overpowered the pilot, who weighed more
than 185 lbs and trained in the military. And then after that overpowered the co-pilot in the same manner, a person
who also weighed upwards of 185 lbs," "I am not sure if anyone has been in the cockpit of one of one of these big
jets, but I will tell you there isn't much space. How in the world would one man pull out two big pilots in cramped
quarters while, at the same time, maintaining control of the airline? Again, it's just not going to happen.hahaha8221;
"In the beginning right after 9/11, like most people, I believed most of what I heard about 9/11, not really giving
much thought to a government conspiracy. However, about a year ago when I began gathering information related
to my expertise as an aeronautical engineer and pilot, I began to see clearly how the government story regarding
the four flights, their paths and their pilots didn't make sense.hahaha8221;
"Now I am firmly convinced after looking at an enormous amount of evidence, as well as using well-establishing
aviation principles, that something else crashed into the Pentagon since it couldn't have been a commercial
jetliner."
"First of all, the supposed pilot would have been overwhelmed just looking at the complexity of the cockpit controls,
he would have had no idea what to do, but we are led to believe that he was able to turn the jet around, head back
to Washington D.C. and then bank at high speeds and at a low altitude, hitting a target which would have looked as
small as thimble from the air. Again, it's impossible and you don't really need an expert to make this final
determination."
"The evidence indicates that the airplane was flying low before it reached the Pentagon lawn since several light
poles were sheared off several hundred yards away form the building. With that in mind, the plane was traveling at
about 400 knots at about 20 feet off the ground for a long distance prior to hitting the Pentagon. hahaha8220;
"This in itself is an impossibility since the airplane would have been kept from hitting the ground by a cushion of
air termed 'ground effect.' No pilot in the world would have been able to control the plane while maintained that air
speed at 20 feet off the ground for that long a distance. Again, it's just impossible but here I will admit that an expert
is needed in order to explain the standards of lift and drag associated with flying a large airliner. hahaha8220;
"I really don't understand how anyone could give the government's story any credibility after seeing the original
pictures taken of the small hole left in the Pentagon wall by whatever flew into it. I am not totally sure what the
military used but one thing for sure, it wasn't a 757 jetliner."
"I think if someone just looks at the hole left and then looks at the size of 757, experts aren't needed to determine it
was an impossibility that a big jet hit the Pentagon wall, especially when there was very little wreckage visible after
the crash."

do you mean these guys?

Respected Leaders and Families 9/11 Truth Statement An alliance
of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11
Posted on a dedicated website
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?...41026093059633
An alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11 announced the
release of the 911 Truth Statement, a call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government
o fficials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur. |
The Statement's list of signatories includes notables spanning the political spectrum, from Presidential candidates
Ralph Nader, Michael Badnarik, and David Cobb to Catherine Austin Fitts, a member of the first Bush
administration, as well as Washington veterans like Pentagon whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and retired CIA
analyst Ray McGovern. Other signers range from peace activists like Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans and
Global Exchange's Kevin Danaher to former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq, Edward L. Peck; from
environmentalists like Randy Hayes and John Robbins to business leaders such as Paul Hawken and Karl
Schwarz, CEO of Patmos Nanotechnologies; from populist journalist Ronnie Dugger to renowned investigative
reporter Kelly Patricia O'Meara.
The Statement also includes 43 noted authors, including New York Times #1 bestseller John Gray, as well as 18
eminent professors, historians, and theologians. Other notables include five-term Georgia Congresswoman
Cynthia McKinney, singers Michelle Shocked and Michael Franti, and actors Ed Asner and Mimi Kennedy.
We want truthful answers to questions such as:
? Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?
? Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not
activated during the attack?
? Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned
about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?
? Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed
that day?
? Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading
that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of
dollars of traceable gains?
? Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been
publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bushappointed
judge?
? How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40
minutes without being detected by the FAA's radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US
military?
? How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as
well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent?
? What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence
agencies or heads of state?
? Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in
Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the
ringleader of the hijackers?
? Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in
addition to almost all of the questions posed here? Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive
Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with
Condoleezza Rice?

yes i think those were the families mentioned...lol

please dont confuse conspiracy theorists with intelligent people. Also, the statement "questioning the truth" is slightly oxymoronic - if its 'the truth' then that means its true, and to question it is illogical, I assume you meant to say 'question the generally accepted theory'.

And yes, there were remains of people recovered and identified from flight 77, but i sure that was all 'planted' and/or just government misinformation.. wow, its so easy to be a conspiracy theorist! All you need to do is deny scientific facts by saying "ya, thats what the government WANTS you to think!!"

fools.

Another american displaying their ignorance - what a surprise.

We had this topic already. There is plenty of evidence for the Pentagon crash. Just because some lame conspiracy video doesnt show it doesnt mean its not there. FUcking morons.

Here in the 1st World country we like to refer to it as sarcasm.

But hey...maybe that brand of humor doesn't exist in 3rd World countries. Probaly too miserable to be sarcastic.

Why is turkey blue on that map?

You wish that i'm wrong, and yes i'm paying attention to my country, i'm much loved and appreciated here, i doubt the same for you since you insulted me 5 times in 5 lines...
I've been interviewed 2 times for the central news on the national tv, 1 for the national radio and i've been on a front page of a computers newspaper and on inside page on couple of daily national newspapers...
Meanwhile you have been in a voting booth to vote for the Bush family (and all the other war-mongers before them) supporting their crimes against the humanity and you've been in front of your brand-new 42" TV to get your daily dose of mind-control...

And yes i haven't visited your country, yet! Not because i can't... I've been offered a job in Salt Lake City from the president of a New Energy Institute that's currently working on a technology for the tapping of space energy to create electrical energy. He's my personal friend and i work with him online. But I'm probably staying here for now. Why? Check out one of the reasons in the mirror!

And by the way i saw the second plane fly into the 2nd tower on LIVE television too, so what? The discussion was for the Pentagon flight...
Everyone knows that planes hit the WTC... we all saw it... but did you saw plane hitting the Pentagon? Did you saw any footage from the most secured building in the world on the time of the attack?

And guess what, the media networks does help Bush with his lies, proven fact!

Educate yourself!

O RLY? SHOW ME!