GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bush quote of the day. Brace yerself. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=568493)

UtahSaints 01-26-2006 11:09 PM

Sooner or later this philosophy will have you lubing up your ass for some nice Chinese chop stix made out of 6 feet tall bamboo tree.
Why aren?t you boys out there proving the point? Why are you sitting on the couch and selling porn? What? more important to you ? your country, free Iraq, or what you do right now? Or should you opt out he ?headless? way and get some ?patriotic? tattoo to style for your friends?

UtahSaints 01-26-2006 11:38 PM

nothing to say tough guys, the defenders of universe?

directfiesta 01-27-2006 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
So his mouth occasionally gets ahead of his brain. I didnt vote for him 2 times for his speaking skills. I voted for him because he doesnt back down from whining little liberals who lean whichever way the wind blows. The guy sticks to his guns. Thats what we've needed since Reagan left office.


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Didn't expect to hear it .. because you have no idea of what he says .. you just have an idea of what YOU THINK he says ....

" Stay the course " : great policy. Only idiots, face with reality, still believe in that line of action :2 cents:

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RS-MEDIA
Sooner or later this philosophy will have you lubing up your ass for some nice Chinese chop stix made out of 6 feet tall bamboo tree.
Why aren?t you boys out there proving the point? Why are you sitting on the couch and selling porn? What? more important to you ? your country, free Iraq, or what you do right now? Or should you opt out he ?headless? way and get some ?patriotic? tattoo to style for your friends?

Im Blind the Army rejected me. :Oh crap

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Didn't expect to hear it .. because you have no idea of what he says .. you just have an idea of what YOU THINK he says ....

" Stay the course " : great policy. Only idiots, face with reality, still believe in that line of action :2 cents:


Get your head back between the legs of your black shemale lover. Errr Female lover rather.. I meant to say Female.

See happens to the best of us. :1orglaugh

CybermedAndy 01-27-2006 01:34 AM

He will never run out of stupid, senseless and hypocritical remarks

SuckOnThis 01-27-2006 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Im Blind the Army rejected me. :Oh crap

So you're blind and admit you don't understand a fucking word he says but you voted for him twice.....interesting.

uno 01-27-2006 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
So his mouth occasionally gets ahead of his brain. I didnt vote for him 2 times for his speaking skills. I voted for him because he doesnt back down from whining little liberals who lean whichever way the wind blows. The guy sticks to his guns. Thats what we've needed since Reagan left office.

I'd rather have a President that learns from his mistakes rather than 'stays the course' even when wrong.

Theo 01-27-2006 05:55 AM

http://santiago.indymedia.org/upload...45e263134c.jpg

leggs 01-27-2006 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alexg
wow you guys are such morons...

you just hear the word Bush and you get a hard on right away, even though you don't have a clue... what's bad about this quote?

oh, you compare the invasion of Iraq to Hamas's ideology to destroy Israel? you are morons...
The United States doesn't want to destroy the country Iraq. never did.
...

Well for first I have a vagina so getting a hard on for George Bush just won't happen. And I can promise that when I think of George Bush, my panties are drier than the sahara desert.

However all I can say is that for a country that has a policy to NOT destroy Iraq....
It certainly has done a good job of it.

Come to think of it America doesn't have a policy of torture, leaving US citizens looking for a meal or a place to crap in the saddle dome, or supporting religious extremists, etc., etc., etc.,

But America tortures, Jesus tells Bush to invade Iraq, etc, etc, etc,.

Man....
If you ask me...
It's like a parent of a 12 year old kid that burns down the neighbour's garage.

Only when he gets arrested and stands before the judge. The judge doesn't ask "where the hell were you when your child was setting fire to the building"

Instead he says,
"Is it your family policy to set fire to garages?.... No??... Ok you're great parents and free to leave my court room."

Alex From San Diego 01-27-2006 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarah_webinc
You honestly don't see why the qoute is just a little bit funny coming from him at this moment in history?


Not really. Where is the humor?

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
So you're blind and admit you don't understand a fucking word he says but you voted for him twice.....interesting.


Yes Im blind literally.... Both eyeballs were shucked from the sockets after a bunch of rage filled liberals got a hold of me after the 2004 Kerry loss. :1orglaugh

I have mugshots I put together with help from a friend. I used braile photo identifiying software to help me pick them out. Here is the pic. :thumbsup
http://www.nomooreantiamerica.com/te...eleftsmall.jpg

The Demon 01-27-2006 10:10 AM

You're right you morons. Let's leave Iraq alone.. I mean what have they ever done to us? You guys remind me of the whiny bitchy hippies that protested the Vietnam war.. What happened to all those hippies you ask? They're in Canada now. Why not shut up, live your low class lives, and let Bush do his job?

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon
You're right you morons. Let's leave Iraq alone.. I mean what have they ever done to us? You guys remind me of the whiny bitchy hippies that protested the Vietnam war.. What happened to all those hippies you ask? They're in Canada now. Why not shut up, live your low class lives, and let Bush do his job?

Haha

The Demon
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 420

420th post and its about hippies. :1orglaugh NOICE! :winkwink:

SilentKnight 01-27-2006 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RS-MEDIA
Sooner or later this philosophy will have you lubing up your ass for some nice Chinese chop stix made out of 6 feet tall bamboo tree.
Why arenhahaha8217;t you boys out there proving the point? Why are you sitting on the couch and selling porn? Whathahaha8217; more important to you hahaha8211; your country, free Iraq, or what you do right now? Or should you opt out he hahaha8220;headlesshahaha8221; way and get some hahaha8220;patriotichahaha8221; tattoo to style for your friends?

How do you assume to know who does & who doesn't serve (current or past)in the military here on GFY?

Just curious.


Silent Knight

(former)
9th platoon, C company
artilleryman
CFB Cornwallis, NS

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight
How do you assume to know who does & who doesn't serve (current or past)in the military here on GFY?

Just curious.


Silent Knight

(former)
9th platoon, C company
artilleryman
CFB Cornwallis, NS

Not me I have gaping empty eye sockets. It made me ineligible. :winkwink:

AmateurFlix 01-27-2006 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon
You're right you morons. Let's leave Iraq alone.. I mean what have they ever done to us? You guys remind me of the whiny bitchy hippies that protested the Vietnam war.. What happened to all those hippies you ask?

Well one of those hippies became president in the 90's which saw a great economic upturn (coincidentally right after Bush Sr. left), saw no significant terrorist attacks on the country during his term, didn't start any large wars and didn't totally fuck up simple tasks like getting food and water to disaster victims. Bush Jr. took care of these oversights however :1orglaugh

MetaMan 01-27-2006 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild
President Bush and AlienQ - a quick comparison:

- Neither can speak English.

- President Bush was elected to the highest office in the land and can fly a jet fighter.

- AlienQ is a mediocre designer unable to even get nominated for an Xbiz award.

:1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
Well one of those hippies became president in the 90's which saw a great economic upturn (coincidentally right after Bush Sr. left), saw no significant terrorist attacks on the country during his term, didn't start any large wars and didn't totally fuck up simple tasks like getting food and water to disaster victims. Bush Jr. took care of these oversights however :1orglaugh

Wow nice completly wrong fact there. Clinton started more wars than Bush.

What about his bombings of Serbia, Iraq, and Afghanistan? At least George W. Bush is tryig to finish what he started. Clinton started on many of these 'small wars' to distract people from his personal scandals and when the media looked the other way abandoned them.

Cole bombings ring a bell? First attack on World Trade center? There are more, but dont feel like wasting braincells on a brainless lib. :winkwink:

Sarah_Jayne 01-27-2006 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex From San Diego
Not really. Where is the humor?

funny as in odd

AmateurFlix 01-27-2006 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Wow nice completly wrong fact there. Clinton started more wars than Bush.

Did you rent 'wag the dog' last night or something?

First off the USS Cole bombing wasn't a 'terrorist' attack, it was an attack on a military vessel... Yes there was the first WTC attack but that wasn't really anything very significant compared to the second attack in 2001.

A few military skirmishes here and there are likely to occur during any presidency no matter who is in office or what party they are in... but surely you're not trying to compare minor involvements in serbia etc that incurred minimal loss of US lives and US tax dollars to the Iraq scandal?

Pornwolf 01-27-2006 05:01 PM

This just goes to show... no matter what terrible things happen in this country, you are still gonna have people that believe whatever the fuck they want, no matter how wrong they obviously are.

stickyfingerz 01-27-2006 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
Did you rent 'wag the dog' last night or something?

First off the USS Cole bombing wasn't a 'terrorist' attack, it was an attack on a military vessel... Yes there was the first WTC attack but that wasn't really anything very significant compared to the second attack in 2001.

A few military skirmishes here and there are likely to occur during any presidency no matter who is in office or what party they are in... but surely you're not trying to compare minor involvements in serbia etc that incurred minimal loss of US lives and US tax dollars to the Iraq scandal?

Wow wasnt a terrorist attack.... :uhoh Ive always been under the understanding that an attack perpetrated by terrorists, would be considered a terrorist attack. Especially since it was done by Al Queda..

Quote:

In 1999 Mr. Clinton decided to intercede in Kosovo in hopes of preventing genocide. Early in the conflict, the president announced the U.S. would not wage a ground war. Later in the conflict bombers held off hitting one of Slobodan Milosevic's palaces because it contained a Rembrandt painting. The message? We'll fight this war, but not if it takes a real commitment. When three U.S. soldiers were captured, President Clinton sent in Jesse Jackson to kiss Milosevic's ring.

Perhaps the clearest example of Mr. Clinton's halfhearted approach to the military came in Somalia. In Mogadishu, U.S. forces were led into a trap and 18 Americans were killed and two Black Hawk helicopters were shot down. Anti-American fighters dragged the naked body of a fallen Army ranger through the streets of Mogadishu. The operation had many flaws, one of which was the American forces were not given tanks and other armored vehicles. Mr. Clinton quickly pulled U.S. forces out, sending the world the message that America wouldn't fight if it meant real danger.

Osama bin Laden got that message. He has said that his followers, trained during the Soviet-Afghan conflict, were among those who fought the Americans in Somalia. In a 1998 interview with ABC News's John Miller, bin Laden said: "The youth were surprised at the low morale of the American soldiers and realized more than before that the American soldier was a paper tiger and after a few blows ran in defeat. And America forgot all the hoopla and media propaganda . . . about being the world leader and the leader of the New World Order, and after a few blows they forgot about this title and left, dragging their corpses and their shameful defeat."

The American people must shoulder some of the blame for the failures of the Clinton years. After all, we elected Mr. Clinton, and democracy tends to give us the leaders we deserve. Voters in 1992 weren't very worried about foreign threats, which seemed to have receded in the wake of America's victories in the Cold War and the Gulf war. Mr. Clinton focused his 1993 campaign on domestic issues. "It's the economy, stupid," was his slogan. Americans never demanded more aggressive military and intelligence agencies.

But it's also the job of a leader to lead, and sometimes circumstances demand a change in focus. Mr. Clinton failed this test even when the United States was directly attacked. In August 1998 al Qaeda bombed the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224. In October 2000 the group bombed the USS Cole in Yemen, killing 17 American sailors. Mr. Clinton never made it a public priority to wipe out the terror network.

Four men were convicted for the embassy blast, and Mr. Clinton ordered a desultory missile strike against Afghanistan. In the waning days of the Clinton presidency, FBI agents were dispatched to Yemen to investigate the Cole attack, only to be lost amid diplomatic wrangling. Rather than strike back, the legacy-conscious Mr. Clinton devoted his final days in office to another failed Mideast peace attempt--and a series of questionable pardons.

The world changed on Sept. 11, and part of that change was the end of the Clinton military mindset. Last week a tough-talking Sen. Hillary Clinton took to the Senate floor. "The president knew what?" she demanded. "My constituents would like to know the answer to that and many other questions, not to blame the president or any other American, just to know." She might want to ask her husband the same question.

Hollywood Horwitz 01-27-2006 06:29 PM

another fine Bushism...

Webby 01-27-2006 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex From San Diego
Not really. Where is the humor?

:1orglaugh

There is a level where "humor" can't reach.

BTW... Behave and stop that silly deviant attempt at real English - the word is "humour". Your descendants obviously failed miserably when they had to rely on Webster for an education. :glugglug

AmateurFlix 01-28-2006 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Wow wasnt a terrorist attack.... :uhoh Ive always been under the understanding that an attack perpetrated by terrorists, would be considered a terrorist attack. Especially since it was done by Al Queda..

How on earth could you call a group attacking any military 'terrorists'?

terrorists attack civilians to induce "terror", thus the name.... if they're not attacking civilians, they're not terrorists. words do have meaning :2 cents:

When Al Queda fights an organized military force, it is a military engaged in warfare - though I suppose the US government calling Al Queda a military would lend it a bit of legitimacy that they would rather it not have.

BlueDesignStudios 01-28-2006 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
How on earth could you call a group attacking any military 'terrorists'?

terrorists attack civilians to induce "terror", thus the name.... if they're not attacking civilians, they're not terrorists. words do have meaning :2 cents:

When Al Queda fights an organized military force, it is a military engaged in warfare - though I suppose the US government calling Al Queda a military would lend it a bit of legitimacy that they would rather it not have.

I think the definition has been updated where you just call anyone who doesn't agree with you a terrorist (or you can call them evil, baddies etc) - its much neater like this, because then you can invade new countries and spread democracy. One day we'll have an entirely democratic middle east.

Until they all vote for the terrorists, then we'll have to change the definition of democracy

Doctor Dre 01-28-2006 02:46 AM

That's probably the most complicated sentence I've ever heard this guy say.

In the situation, he is right thought.

stickyfingerz 01-28-2006 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
How on earth could you call a group attacking any military 'terrorists'?

terrorists attack civilians to induce "terror", thus the name.... if they're not attacking civilians, they're not terrorists. words do have meaning :2 cents:

When Al Queda fights an organized military force, it is a military engaged in warfare - though I suppose the US government calling Al Queda a military would lend it a bit of legitimacy that they would rather it not have.

Well funny cause the Geneva convention all the libs so often cite does not define Al queda as a military organization. Yes its not a terrorist attack when they pull up alongside a Navy vessel in friendly waters not during a war and suicide bomb it and kill soliders in peace time... Ya thats not a terrorist atack as much as you arent and asshat.. :1orglaugh

directfiesta 01-28-2006 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
and kill soliders in peace time...

There is not such thing as " peace time " with the USA :2 cents:

SuckOnThis 01-28-2006 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Well funny cause the Geneva convention all the libs so often cite does not define Al queda as a military organization. Yes its not a terrorist attack when they pull up alongside a Navy vessel in friendly waters not during a war and suicide bomb it and kill soliders in peace time... Ya thats not a terrorist atack as much as you arent and asshat.. :1orglaugh

Do you even know what the fuck you are talking about?
The Geneva Convention is a treaty (actually 4 treaties) created in 1949.

AmateurFlix 01-28-2006 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Well funny cause the Geneva convention all the libs so often cite does not define Al queda as a military organization. Yes its not a terrorist attack when they pull up alongside a Navy vessel in friendly waters not during a war and suicide bomb it and kill soliders in peace time... Ya thats not a terrorist atack as much as you arent and asshat.. :1orglaugh

Ah, so then it's only a war if it is defined as a war by the Geneva convention. Therefore by your reasoning prior to the Geneva convention there were no wars, only terrorists. :1orglaugh

"not during a war and suicide bomb it and kill soliders in peace time"
but this already happened long after the first attack on the WTC. So by your own definition this was not a 'peace time'

stickyfingerz 01-29-2006 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
Do you even know what the fuck you are talking about?
The Geneva Convention is a treaty (actually 4 treaties) created in 1949.

Look up how the treaty defines a solider dumbass. Uniformed. Show me a terrorist wearing a uniform.

Rochard 01-29-2006 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ
"I don't see how you can be a partner in peace if you advocate the destruction of a country as part of your platform."


I nearly spat out my coffee on that one.:1orglaugh

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/...ion/index.html

I guess he forgot to append that statement with, "Unless the nation has lots of oil, then they are fair game"

You've got to be kidding me, RIGHT?

There is a HUGE difference between invading a country and overthrowing it's government and demanding that an entire country and it's reglion cease to exist.

They don't want to invade Isreal; They want to kill every last Jew in the Middle East. In case anyone has forgotten, This is pretty much in line with Nazi Germany. How many Jews did they slaugher wholesale? In bulk I might add?

Persignup Dustin 01-29-2006 08:09 PM

For such a joke of a prez, he really has more supporters than I'd expect...:disgust

reynold 01-30-2006 03:14 AM

Sheer hypocrisy! I'm sorry Mr. President but you did not impress us with such rhetorics.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123