did i say that? do you have problems with comprehension?

i said its not the rappers job to step in and take care of parentless kids.

i love how you quoted a single statement without the rest of the paragraph and spun your own lil vibe on it.

You said...


Here's to the social services state MetaMan envisions... when parents not up to his standards they should have their kids taken by the state. We all know that the state does a bang-up job -- with their group homes and all...

you took my point totally out of context and are just nit picking like a little homo phobic closet homo with a stack of bananas in one hand and jello in the other.

the entire point of the conversation with him was about rappers parenting kids, i was saying its not their job.

now you're talking about social services when that is one small point of mine and it had to do with if the parents cant take care of their children its not the rappers job, it would be social services, i never said that children should be taken away from their parents.

again the point is that rapper shouldnt be parents, you are just a nit picking little tard who felt it necassary you come into someone elses conversation and do not even point out the topic of it.

You're soooo cute when you get taken to task...

HOMOPHOBE? BANANAS? JELLO?

Serious points there...

If you want to backpeddle, just backpeddle.

i dont have conversations with little (probly british) nit picking tards,

the conversation was about rappers not being parents, NOT SOCIAL SERVICES, stop trying to get involved when you cannot even comprehend the main point.

that means shut your mouth you "broke", bent dick, ostrich asshole, creampie stick a dick in your eye, nit picking tard.

If the parents are drug addicts and not feeding their children, maybe social services should really step in at some point. Some parents really are negligent.

I doubt Metaman meant for social services to take custody of people's children just because they let them listen to rap music.

thank you, i was having a construtive conversation with you and this "broke" character needs to come in and get on my jock about something that has nothing to do with the point i was trying to make.

You'll just have to avoid the inevi-evitable: Godwin's Law

"Usenet There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful.
"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." "

You're sooo cute.

I see you got away from homophobic, bananas, and jello... Unfortunately, you didn't do much better this time.

If you want a private conversation, take it to IM.

if you didnt notice the person i was having the conversation with understood exactly what i am saying.

now please go back to doing whatever it is you do with your boring life and stay out of a conversation unless you understand the base point.

i cannot stand idiots like you who come in in the middle of a conversation and try to act like they know what they are talking about and the other 2 people look at eachother like "what the fuck is this idiot talking about" if you didnt notice in this thread you're that idiot.

no thanks i am not gay, and i dont pay for webcam shows, yours is probly pretty terrible anyway.

Fitty

Big B
CECash.com

I'm clearly the idiot:

homo phobic
closet homo
bananas in one hand
jello
british) nit picking tard
bent dick
ostrich asshole
creampie stick a dick in your eye
nit picking tard


Damn - I'm clearly the loose cannon...

yes, i totally agree with you, i am glad you finally understand, now pull up your diaper son.

hmm, i watched that whole Bill O'Reilly vidclip, and I must've missed where he got owned? lol, are some of you so hate filled with contempt with O'Reilly that you'll take the side of two very ignorant niggz? They were interuppting both Bill and the school principal with silly laughs and childish remarks...So how did he get owned again? anyone?

I'm honestly amazed by your prowess... rap musicians and movie stars shouldn't raise my kids? Really -- are you sure?

Way to miss the point of the thread completely...

So are you are you or are you not going to apply to be on O'Reilly's show?

usually its the thead starter who dictates where the thread is going, if you didnt notice i was having the conversation with him, he knew exactly what i was talking about, i dont see the nickname "broke" on the thread title. try to follow along son.

you just agreed with me also, even though you didnt even read the thread, and you already admitted you're an idiot, why are you still here?

you just totally ruined the entire debate because you felt a need you should come in here and be a 3rd person into a conversation.

again if you didnt notice you're that guy when you're talking with one of your buddies that comes along and makes a point that has nothing to do with the conversation who you look at like "what is this idiot talking about?".

websiex i personally apologize for this idiot "broke", its just another idiot giving you a reason not to try to have a productive conversation on GFY.

I don't think O'Reilly was owned in that segment. But moreso exposed for not only not being a moderator, but impartial. He cleary had a side. I'll pass on addressing the slur. But at times, they did act childish laughing, and some of the responses were less than professional for a CEO, amung other things.

I would say he was more 'exposed' than owned. As he is far from impartial on the rap music position, and proved as much.

Metaman has some good points, I would have liked to see some of them further developed as he was onto something w/o being baited by this other 'broke' character who is pulling an interesting thread into some kinda GFY banter.

:disgust

Bill O'Reilly and the like just sum up rap music into one category.. anyone into rap/hiphop can tell you there are a shitload of niche's, just the like industry we all are in.. underground hiphop, nyc mixtape circuits, down south shit, bay area rap, gospel rap, rock/rap, "gangsta", old school, bubble gum rap, etc etc.... it's pretty unfair to pass responsibility on to a few entertainers..

where is 12clicks when you need him lol

http://pages.zdnet.com/sartre65/site...evolution1.gif

I suppose O'Reilly didn't get owned on The Smoking Gun either

The article above includes the actual sexual harassment charges filed against O'Reilly (the charges were subsequently dropped after an "out of court settlement"...translation Big Mouth Bill got own3d).

ADG Webmaster

Hippocracy at it's finest.

:1orglaugh