BTW you foreners they are keeping you in mind as well and talking about you all.
c-span 2:30 ET net porn hearing..
Collapse
X
-
-
Regpay
don?t now if you show the story about CP in the WSJ yesterday ? http://online.wsj.com/article_email/...zQxNjc2Wj.html
ASACP provided info on these billing companies since 2002 and AVN reported on it over two years:
http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...ntent_ID=69702ASACP - Protecting Your Business By Protecting ChildrenComment
-
-
absolutely. they'd all shut us down in a second but i found it odd that the party many here think to be on our side and often praise as an alterntive to the evil republicans are actually the same.Originally posted by SykkBoy2I'm just listening to the audio while working, but peeking over once in awhile and have noticed this too...but really, we don't have any "friends" in congress on either side...333-765-551Comment
-
Listening to CPAN now on the hearing...
Good thing cambria is on the panel...
Fight the bump!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
I am reserving judgement on Cambria being on the panel until I hear him speak and address this Pornographer = Pedophile/CP connection.Originally posted by FightThisPatentListening to CPAN now on the hearing...
Good thing cambria is on the panel...
Fight the bump!Comment
-
sounds like the guy on now has been surfing TGPs and free sites!Comment
-
$2.5 Bln!!! WFT? - I knew you guys where shaving!!
and that bitch can stop "training" my goverment right now
Comment
-
we are definitely in agreement thereOriginally posted by bringerabsolutely. they'd all shut us down in a second but i found it odd that the party many here think to be on our side and often praise as an alterntive to the evil republicans are actually the same.
I just feel better with the democrats because they'll lock things up in gridlock a little better ;-)Comment
-
"There is no substitute for parental involvement." - Tatiana Platt
No shit
Comment
-
Originally posted by After Shock MediaI am reserving judgement on Cambria being on the panel until I hear him speak and address this Pornographer = Pedophile/CP connection.
exactly... the federal prosecutors and Oprah have equated porn to CP.. which is completely insane, FBI field agents who bust pedofiles, rarely find porn with the CP images... CP is a mental sickness and they don't look at porn.
you don't all of a sudden become a pedo... it usually occurs in the developing years, usually through personal trauma, continues through growth, or surfaces later in adulthood....
you don't become a pedo because you see pics of underage kids.. there is more brain synapses that have to get fired off that taps into the mental illness.
Fight the Pedros!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
thats very true. thank god for the democrats ineffectiveness with pushing threw billsOriginally posted by SykkBoy2we are definitely in agreement there
I just feel better with the democrats because they'll lock things up in gridlock a little better ;-)333-765-551Comment
-
-
for those not watching Tatiana is the Chief Trust Officer and Senior VP at AOL.Originally posted by mikeyddddd"There is no substitute for parental involvement." - Tatiana Platt
Fight the 411!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
Yes finally a .kids talk.Comment
-
Originally posted by PR_TomYes! He's mentioning .kids domain. Very good.
.XXX = bad
.KIDS = good
Fight the .$$$!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
That was a pretty harsh threat.
Umm people go register your sites with ICRA if you have not yet.Comment
-
I know man - overkill.Originally posted by FlexxAeonlol...why old dude chewing out cambria?
he doesn't even know what he's talking about (old dude)Domain Auction - now till 12:01AM on the 2nd...
Paper Streeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet Cash
The Real Workout - Innocent High - Oye Loca - Her Freshman Year - Solo Interviews - This Girl Sucks. ** HQ Fresh ORIGINAL sites.Comment
-
Freedom is so quaint.
Our jail cells await, See you there!
p.s. the "old dude" is ted stevens... bridge to nowhere ring a bell?Last edited by - Jesus Christ -; 01-19-2006, 12:02 PM.
AmenComment
-
exactly....we've been labeling sites with ratings/warnings for years....Originally posted by PR_TomAll of my sites are labeled "Adults Only" with a warning page. Does the chairman suggest "adults only" labels on nekkid pictures?flexx [dot] aeon [at] gmailComment
-
exactlyOriginally posted by bringerthats very true. thank god for the democrats ineffectiveness with pushing threw bills
a congress in gridlock is a good thing when we can be beneficiaries of that gridlockComment
-
Already do.Originally posted by After Shock MediaUmm people go register your sites with ICRA if you have not yet.
Comment
-
I am really becoming to like the Hawaiian senator.Comment
-
umm fuck mark pryor.Comment
-
-
Mark Pryor OBVIOUSLY has a financial motivation for his questions.
Furthermore he doesn't even listen to the answers after he asks a question.
What a fuck, the cowboy attitude is irritating too.Domain Auction - now till 12:01AM on the 2nd...
Paper Streeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet Cash
The Real Workout - Innocent High - Oye Loca - Her Freshman Year - Solo Interviews - This Girl Sucks. ** HQ Fresh ORIGINAL sites.Comment
-
See above.Originally posted by mikeydddddIFFOR must have gotten into Mark Pryor's pocket.Comment
-
-
One of the congressman asked Cambria about .KIDS that couldn't a porn site operator get a .KIDS domain and therefore gain exposure to kids.
Cambria didn't have a strong answer like he had with the other questions.
What he should have mentioned is that whoever is the registrar for .KIDS would have a review committee that would ensure that the website that owns the .KIDS domain would be screened and validated to be kid friendly.
That this registrar would also monitor the websites to ensure compliance.
This is why a .KIDS domain would cost like $200/year
As a policy, any .KIDS website that snuck in porn, and after a review process, would lose the domain.
.KIDS is the only effective tool that can protect children.
Some will argue that the .KIDS.US extension did some pitiful that there is no support for a .KIDS
.KIDS.US is not a good extension, and it really takes technology companies like Microsoft and AOL to put in a .KIDS filter to make this a reality.
Then ISP will offer proxy services to filter... third party products like zone alarm, norton firewall, etc could put in the white listing filter.
The senator from VA was the most tech savvy, and he said that he would rather see technology solve this problem, not congress.
Self-labelling with ICRA is great, labelling content is great.. but the problem is those that don't take that responsibility causes the problem.
And as a national study found, over 75% of free content porn comes from outside the US.. so any blacklisting filtering like .XXX just won't work...it will be like swiss cheese.
Lobbying MS and AOL is needed!
Fight the .XXX!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
Yep, .KIDS would be nowhere better policed than the adult industry itself as well IMHO.
.KIDS trying to host adult content would be like a criminal in prison for child abuse, and we all know what that means.
.XXX would simply double overnight the number of porn sites on the net. Duh.43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Comment
-
The chairman was trying to point fingers at the adult industry as being the problem.
The statistics gather by asacp.org over the last 2 years,has conclusively pointed out that CP is prevalent in the US! but. it is mainstream companies that are inadvertantly hosting, billing,and domain registration for CP.
There will be more talk about the asacp.org data to government to refute the fingering pointing at adult.
Fight the numbers!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
Gotta love the one quote from Sen. Mark Pryor...
"I like that dot XXX"
I'm sure he does...Comment
-
I wonder if he also favors a .bribe domain ;-)Originally posted by erehwonGotta love the one quote from Sen. Mark Pryor...
"I like that dot XXX"
I'm sure he does...Comment
-
Originally posted by SykkBoy2I wonder if he also favors a .bribe domain ;-)
probably more like .contribution

Fight the semantics!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
I cant believe Cambria didnt say porn site operators dont want kids exposed to their sites and only want adults duh.Also the biggest preditors of children online are in mainstream chatrooms not on porn sites. Fuck this pisses me off.Originally posted by FightThisPatentOne of the congressman asked Cambria about .KIDS that couldn't a porn site operator get a .KIDS domain and therefore gain exposure to kids.
Cambria didn't have a strong answer like he had with the other questions.
What he should have mentioned is that whoever is the registrar for .KIDS would have a review committee that would ensure that the website that owns the .KIDS domain would be screened and validated to be kid friendly.
That this registrar would also monitor the websites to ensure compliance.
This is why a .KIDS domain would cost like $200/year
As a policy, any .KIDS website that snuck in porn, and after a review process, would lose the domain.
.KIDS is the only effective tool that can protect children.
Some will argue that the .KIDS.US extension did some pitiful that there is no support for a .KIDS
.KIDS.US is not a good extension, and it really takes technology companies like Microsoft and AOL to put in a .KIDS filter to make this a reality.
Then ISP will offer proxy services to filter... third party products like zone alarm, norton firewall, etc could put in the white listing filter.
The senator from VA was the most tech savvy, and he said that he would rather see technology solve this problem, not congress.
Self-labelling with ICRA is great, labelling content is great.. but the problem is those that don't take that responsibility causes the problem.
And as a national study found, over 75% of free content porn comes from outside the US.. so any blacklisting filtering like .XXX just won't work...it will be like swiss cheese.
Lobbying MS and AOL is needed!
Fight the .XXX!Last edited by tony286; 01-19-2006, 02:24 PM.Comment
-
The program is going to repeat at 10:25 PM ET on C-SPAN.Comment



Comment