I've never done so well with them and have heard that from others. Most of my traffic is from search engines by the way.
1:2866
1:2866
-
icq 156131086 -
There are quite a few threads such as this. Do you think all sites that use CCBill to process with convert exactly the same?
One site could be 1:350 and the next site 1:4000. It doesn't do any good to look at an overall ratio. -
only a few... the thing with ccbill sites (aside from other issues that have been debated extensively) is that they are free to set up and maintain processing for, so there's not much of a reason for a program to remove a 'dud' site since it doesn't really cost them anything to maintain it (aside from a bad reputation for poorly converting sites). If someone is paying a few hundred/thousand bucks a month for a NATS type system, they're more likely to work on the site until it converts well or get rid of it to save the processing fees.
dieselaction.com met-art.com etc tend to do very well though and are processed through ccbill
Comment
-
Ya the programs that cascade with NATS or there own software seem to convert better.icq 156131086Comment
-
http://www.grannyfuckfest.com/ does 1:400-500 constantly on MGP traffic.
Give it a shot....
http://www.grannyfuckfest.com/webmasters/ccbill.htmlComment
-
Dude, I was trying to eat.Originally posted by KingK7icq 156131086Comment
-
Originally posted by BCyber
This in my sig will keep you off food for days:Comment
-
CCBill's script bases ratios on raw clicks and not unique clicks.
That is why sites that use CCBill's aff script seem to have higher ratios.Comment
-
why are you selling itSince 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.
Comment
Comment