GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who makes the photo? The photographer or the Camera? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=562168)

quantum-x 01-10-2006 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
With Nikon releasing the D200, Canon and Nikon wars are going to hopefully drive down some prices man!

I love my 20D though. I really do.

They have.. it's the 5D ;)

abyss_al 01-10-2006 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x
I have a copy of 'the camera' and 'the print' sitting next to my desk.


omg no way!!! thats awsome... i only have his books/documentaries :thumbsup

Theo 01-10-2006 10:14 PM

Ansel Adams......was he colorblind? most of his pics were B/W













j/k

abyss_al 01-10-2006 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
I think we are on different pages. I totally agree with you about image quality and the regular eye.

But that equipment comes in handy. I love shooting surfing, I will take my 20D and 400MM Canon lense over a point and shoot and honestly admit, it makes me better because I simply can't zoom without it. I simply will not get the sharpness from an inferior lense. The fast focus. The burst rate. These things are proven.

Now, shooting a vase or a tree? I don't disagree. Shooting a concert? That equipment would help!


$5 dollar camera, back in high school...

JFK 01-10-2006 10:22 PM

The shooter makes the composition, the camera hopefully captures the vision they saw :2 cents:

KRL 01-10-2006 10:25 PM

Its the creative eye of the photographer that captures that magic moment precisely.

Ogix 01-10-2006 11:27 PM

I think that shooter. I had friend who was making photos with old ZENIT :))))

reed_4 01-11-2006 12:39 AM

nice photo shots, i give the credit to the photographer not the device. :thumbsup

SmokeyTheBear 01-11-2006 12:41 AM

neither , its the subject

reynold 01-11-2006 04:43 AM

Capturing an image is the same as communicating--there's the receiver (the subject), the sender (the photographer) and the channel (the camera). Here, if the receiver, or the sender, or the channel doesn't work well, no precise message can be sent; and this is perfectly the same with photography..

BlueDesignStudios 01-11-2006 05:18 AM

fiddy!!!!!

quantum-x 01-11-2006 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
neither , its the subject

Got to quibble with you there smokey.

NoWhErE 01-11-2006 07:59 AM

This is like asking someone :

what makes a good painting?

The paint? or the painter?

mardigras 01-11-2006 09:21 AM

I had to use some disposables recently while my camera was being serviced. The pictures were OK for what they were needed for bub my biggest complaint with them is that the framing of the resulting pictures is somewhat off of what you see in the viewfinder.

SmokeyTheBear 01-11-2006 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x
Got to quibble with you there smokey.

If your trying to take a cool picture of a dog.. you could use a different camera and still get a good shot , you can use a diffeent photographer and still get a good shot, but without the dog your screwed :thumbsup

So in MY opinion , its the subject that makes the photo.. not the photographer or the camera :)

erehwon 01-11-2006 01:01 PM

Its the shooter, look at what Robert Capa was shooting 70 years ago...

http://www.temple.edu/photo/photogra...apa/capa1.html

Capa didn't have a Nikon D200 to shoot this, disposable cameras have better technology than what photographers were lugging around back then.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123