GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Annoying posts = 2 years in jail (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=561669)

SomeCreep 01-10-2006 03:37 AM

50 Annoying posts

Chio 01-10-2006 04:19 AM

Does that mean I can't call someone fruity pants? :Oh crap

sumphatpimp 01-10-2006 05:10 AM

my name is
Proxy Server

who 01-10-2006 05:15 AM

Does anyone else get the feeling that this is about the only bill which came from George W. Bush himself? Like, he has been pestering the administration for five years trying to get at least one of his ideas put into law?

This is just about spot on for someone of his IQ.

lazycash 01-10-2006 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chio
Does that mean I can't call someone fruity pants? :Oh crap

Sure you can, just tell us who you are and then fire away.

stickyfingerz 01-10-2006 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by who
Does anyone else get the feeling that this is about the only bill which came from George W. Bush himself? Like, he has been pestering the administration for five years trying to get at least one of his ideas put into law?

This is just about spot on for someone of his IQ.

This bill wasnt made by Bush. It was made by Spector. Spector is one of the most liberal Republicans around. If I had to point to one Republican Senator and say "He needs to go" It would be him. This little blip of a law isnt going to be used to put anyone in jail. Maybe if it was someone stalking someone and being pursued for other matters it might be used to add onto the list of charges that would be it. Silly people...

FlyingIguana 01-10-2006 09:21 AM

there goes half of gfy...

Triple 6 01-10-2006 09:32 AM

this whole thread is annoying.

im turning all you asses in

kmanrox 01-10-2006 09:37 AM

I guess Franck's lucky he isn't in the USA, huh?

SuckOnThis 01-10-2006 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
This bill wasnt made by Bush. It was made by Spector. Spector is one of the most liberal Republicans around. If I had to point to one Republican Senator and say "He needs to go" It would be him. This little blip of a law isnt going to be used to put anyone in jail. Maybe if it was someone stalking someone and being pursued for other matters it might be used to add onto the list of charges that would be it. Silly people...

You are a fucking idiot. Read the language of the bill:

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Note: Calling you a fucking idiot isnt in any way intended to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass, it is simply a fact.

stickyfingerz 01-10-2006 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
You are a fucking idiot. Read the language of the bill:

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Note: Calling you a fucking idiot isnt in any way intended to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass, it is simply a fact.

Well guess you are going to jail now pal... Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT. :winkwink: Hey but spread the paranoia that is the wacky left. It amuses me. :1orglaugh

SmokeyTheBear 01-10-2006 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT. :winkwink:


Thats hardly the point.. you dont make laws for no purpose..

Your right in one respect , its unlikely they will start policing forums, but this law is one of those laws that will be mostly ignored until the feds have some reason to "get you" then they will use this law to infringe on your rights.. ( IMO)

Violetta 01-10-2006 12:08 PM

bush :error

stickyfingerz 01-10-2006 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
Thats hardly the point.. you dont make laws for no purpose..

Your right in one respect , its unlikely they will start policing forums, but this law is one of those laws that will be mostly ignored until the feds have some reason to "get you" then they will use this law to infringe on your rights.. ( IMO)


I think it will be used to get people they have something on, but cant quite prove it, if its ever used. Im imagining it will be amended out of the bill. In fact I almost guarantee it will. At least the language of it. The annoy part is a bit too vauge. Might be good if they reword it to only being terroristic threats.

directfiesta 01-10-2006 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
I think it will be used to get people they have something on, but cant quite prove it, if its ever used. Im imagining it will be amended out of the bill. In fact I almost guarantee it will. At least the language of it. The annoy part is a bit too vauge. Might be good if they reword it to only being terroristic threats.


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

26MLR 01-10-2006 12:21 PM

unenforcable... don't worry.

moneymotivates 01-10-2006 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0
yea stuff is starting to get scary, video cams on everything, domestic spying, obscenity charges, & now 2 years for annoying someone?

All we need now is the thought police & we've duplicated 1984


yeah its getting more and more ridiculous everyday...

unbelievable

directfiesta 01-10-2006 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0
I'll take my chances :thumbsup

And yea stuff is starting to get scary, video cams on everything, domestic spying, obscenity charges, & now 2 years for annoying someone?

All we need now is the thought police & we've duplicated 1984

And you forgot opening mail ...

Quote:

US Opening Personal Mail To Protect Against Terrorism

January 10, 2006 11:00 a.m. EST

Hector Duarte Jr. - All Headline News Staff Reporter

Washington D.C. (AHN) ? A Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman says U.S officials are opening personal mail that comes in from abroad when they deem it necessary to protect the country from terrorism.

This news comes on the heels of revelations the government resorted to eavesdropping on citizens without previous government approval following the 9/11 attacks.

Suzanne Trevino, a spokeswoman for the agency, says, "Customs and Border Protection is charged with making sure that terrorists and terrorists' weapons don't enter the country. One of our areas of responsibility is to inspect international mail coming into our country. We respect privacy and always keep that at the forefront, but at the same time we need to make sure we do our job in keeping U.S. citizens safe."

The Customs and Border Protection Web site states, "all mail originating outside United States Customs territory that is to be delivered inside U.S. Customs territory is subject to Customs examination."

Grant Goodman, an 81-year-old retired history professor, drew attention to the matter after discovering a letter he received from a colleague in the Philippines was opened and resealed by the agency, and then forwarded to him.

He expressed shock at the fact the letter had been screened.

Goodman tells Reuters, "It was a big surprise. The public should know that this is being done. Nobody whom I know had any idea that this was going on. And as far as I know, it's never been announced. It's never been revealed that this is being done."
more leftist propaganda to ANNOY stickyfingerzdotnet :1orglaugh

True, laws are not applied .... :)

SuckOnThis 01-10-2006 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Well guess you are going to jail now pal... Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT. :winkwink: Hey but spread the paranoia that is the wacky left. It amuses me. :1orglaugh


What part of the first Amendment of the Constitution do you right wingers not understand?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, or OF THE PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Funny how right wingers claim to be the ones that support less govt intrusion yet you have no problem with this, wiretaps, warantless searches, etc. This is nothing more than a republican attempt to target people that speak out against them and gives them the tools to do it legally. Another nazi tactic that you support. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

stickyfingerz 01-10-2006 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
And you forgot opening mail ...



more leftist propaganda to ANNOY stickyfingerzdotnet :1orglaugh

True, laws are not applied .... :)


Thats nothing new, and isnt something Bush started. Post office has always been allowed to inspect suspicious mail. They did that back in the 80's. Hey but blame it on Bush. :thumbsup

stickyfingerz 01-10-2006 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
What part of the first Amendment of the Constitution do you right wingers not understand?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, or OF THE PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Funny how right wingers claim to be the ones that support less govt intrusion yet you have no problem with this, wiretaps, warantless searches, etc. This is nothing more than a republican attempt to target people that speak out against them and gives them the tools to do it legally. Another nazi tactic that you support. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

Please explain how the first Amendment applies to what we were speaking about, or for that matter wiretaps on calls from the middle east.. What is a warantless search btw? lol

FlyingIguana 01-10-2006 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Well guess you are going to jail now pal... Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT. :winkwink: Hey but spread the paranoia that is the wacky left. It amuses me. :1orglaugh

why would they pass the bill and not use it? musta been a slow day in washington

GlydeGirl 01-10-2006 01:31 PM

Every day that Bush is in power, more American rights are quashed. This is total bullshit, a complete violation of free speech. It's like you are living in a police state instead of a democracy. What can you Americans going to do to get your rights and freedoms back? This is almost as bad as China!

Damian_Maxcash 01-10-2006 01:36 PM

OK - This is my golden oppornity - Im in the UK so Im renting myself out to annoy people for you - lots of people here think Im annoying anyway, so I have the perfect qualifications for the job.

ilbb 01-12-2006 01:58 AM

this must be joke :) This is possible only in country where tomorrow means yesterday :)))

theloader 01-12-2006 02:09 AM

only in america :)

stickyfingerz 01-12-2006 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ilbb
this must be joke :) This is possible only in country where tomorrow means yesterday :)))

You trying to say that because we are premtively trying to stop terrorism? Many countries have way less personal rights than the U.S. You're an idiot. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123