Beatles or The Stones? - GoFuckYourself.com

xxxjay · 01-04-2006, 12:40 AM

ok here's the poll...

baddog · 01-04-2006, 12:44 AM

for same reasons as in thread #1

SomeCreep · 01-04-2006, 01:05 AM

The stones are awesome, but they're not on the same level as The Beatles.

chaze · 01-04-2006, 01:08 AM

Beetles, hands down...

jscott · 01-04-2006, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaze

Beetles, hands down...

i agree

je_rome · 01-04-2006, 01:14 AM

no contest...its The Beatles

xxxjay · 01-04-2006, 01:23 AM

I picked the Beatles, but the Stones also pretty much rule too.

baddog · 01-04-2006, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaze

Beetles, hands down...

You must be a real fan if you can't even spell their name correctly.

Shoehorn! · 01-04-2006, 01:45 AM

The Beatles for sure, by far the greatest band the world will ever see.

Shoehorn! · 01-04-2006, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

You must be a real fan if you can't even spell their name correctly.

kenny · 01-04-2006, 02:29 AM

The beatles by a long shot

Mr.Right - Banned For Life · 01-04-2006, 02:41 AM

The Stones by far. The Beatels would have to be one of the worst bands out. And i mean that in a nice way.

xxxjay · 01-04-2006, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

You must be a real fan if you can't even spell their name correctly.

The spelling Nazi is back!

abyss_al · 01-04-2006, 02:56 AM

i hate the stones...

LittleSassy · 01-04-2006, 03:25 AM

rolling stones here...

Your Mothers Secret · 01-04-2006, 03:35 AM

The Stones.

How can the beatles be the superior band when they allowed their ego's and immaturity break up the band in 1970?

The Stones longevity, dedication and determination make them the better band. They have given the world more music and all around entertainment.

The beatles broke up the band over a period of arguments like
a bunch of selfish kids. Regardless of their hits and radio propaganda
they were selfish and immature.

PixeLs · 01-04-2006, 04:02 AM

Beatles, all the way!

xxxjay · 01-04-2006, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Your Mothers Secret

The Stones.

How can the beatles be the superior band when they allowed their ego's and immaturity break up the band in 1970?

The Stones longevity, dedication and determination make them the better band. They have given the world more music and all around entertainment.

The beatles broke up the band over a period of arguments like
a bunch of selfish kids. Regardless of their hits and radio propaganda
they were selfish and immature.

You gotta hand it to the Stones for sticking together.

$5 submissions · 01-04-2006, 04:32 AM

I like both but if I had to choose.... Beatles. The Stones may have longevity but the Beatles have versatility. It's hard to get bored of the Beatles. IMHO, at least.

ServerGenius · 01-04-2006, 04:36 AM

The beatles suck....girlie music too sweet the tragedies brought them eternal
fame.....not their music.

Free Beatle fact: They came up with the idea for the name The Beatles by
Buddy Holly who's band was called The Crickets.

Free Stones fact: Roling Stones drummer Charlie Watts never hits the hi-hat and
snare at the same time.

damonx · 01-04-2006, 04:58 AM

The Beatles

reed_4 · 01-04-2006, 05:22 AM

Better? I say the Beatles is the best band.

john77 · 01-04-2006, 05:36 AM

Let´s rock!
Only The Rolling Stones !

BlackCrayon · 01-04-2006, 05:37 AM

stones or the beatles?

Zhiro58 · 01-04-2006, 05:49 AM

Beatles forever...

Trixie Racer · 01-04-2006, 06:07 AM

Hard choice.. While I'd love the opprtunity to have been able to see the Beatles live, the Rolling Stones put on the best live show I ever saw. So, I'd have to go with the Stones..

Sarah_Jayne · 01-04-2006, 07:47 AM

It depends on the song but I grew up as the kid of two Beatles fans so I am more or less always going to say them.

However, I live about five minutes on foot from the train station with Jagger and Richards re-met each other before forming the Stones

Tapaz · 01-04-2006, 07:48 AM

Motley Crue

WebairGerard · 01-04-2006, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep

The stones are awesome, but they're not on the same level as The Beatles.

Agree. I always thought that The Beatles were the best band ever and the Stones were the coolest.

TheLegacy · 01-04-2006, 07:49 AM

yes the stones music is good, but the beatles changed the face of music forever including how things are recorded and also in writing styles.

Violetta · 01-04-2006, 09:25 AM

I'm a beatles fan!

Pornopat · 01-04-2006, 09:32 AM

That would depend what kind of mood I am in.

Drake · 01-04-2006, 09:39 AM

I'll have to say the Beatles.

Thomas1007 · 01-04-2006, 09:51 AM

The Beatles for sure

Manga1 · 01-04-2006, 09:58 AM

The Stones by far. Much better sound than the Beatles. The Stones have an edge. The Beatles were too poppy. Sure the Beatles were a good band for their time,but the Stones are just on another level entirely.

Your Mothers Secret · 01-04-2006, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manga1

The Stones by far. Much better sound than the Beatles. The Stones have an edge. The Beatles were too poppy. Sure the Beatles were a good band for their time,but the Stones are just on another level entirely.

Exactly.
The Beatles fantasy is for those who need to escape to an innocent time
thru "artsy" music.The Beatles would never had been able to produce music equal to the Stones thru the 70's, 80's and 90's and now, a new century.

Duke Ellington didn't quit before his 30th birthday
Miles Davis didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
B.B. King didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
Ray Charles didn't quit before his 30th birthday.

I like the Beatles, but they broke up because they were only thinking of themselves and not the rest of the world.

STONES FACT: Mick Jagger is said to be worth $900 million dollars. (why doesn't he quit? He loves the music)
STONES FACT: Charlie Watts stabbed Keith Richards in a fit of rage.

GlydeGirl · 01-04-2006, 12:41 PM

Beatles!

BigCashCrew · 01-04-2006, 12:42 PM

I went with the Beatles. I love their music.. I'm going to put on Abbey Road now.

pornstar2pac · 01-04-2006, 01:02 PM

Iron Maiden is better than both

VicD · 01-04-2006, 01:06 PM

I'am a big fan of the Stones for over 25 years but i also like some of the Beatles' songs

alan-l · 01-04-2006, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Your Mothers Secret

Exactly.
The Beatles fantasy is for those who need to escape to an innocent time
thru "artsy" music.The Beatles would never had been able to produce music equal to the Stones thru the 70's, 80's and 90's and now, a new century.

Duke Ellington didn't quit before his 30th birthday
Miles Davis didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
B.B. King didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
Ray Charles didn't quit before his 30th birthday.

I like the Beatles, but they broke up because they were only thinking of themselves and not the rest of the world.

STONES FACT: Mick Jagger is said to be worth $900 million dollars. (why doesn't he quit? He loves the music)
STONES FACT: Charlie Watts stabbed Keith Richards in a fit of rage.

you gotta be kiddin. First, if it's for "artsy", then let's forget about the best Stones songs, those from the Brian Jones era. After that, they made a couple of good tunes and then... repeat year, after year, after year, after year. No surprise Keith Richards said "there's only one song in the air". At least in his head is a proven fact

If it's for edge, I would never, ever listen a band of 60 years old grandpas pluggin a Telecaster trying to look cool and playing the same song for... 40 FUCKING YEARS!!!

then your first statement is hilarious, you're comparing composers which in their solo careers took very different and definite ways, making some incredible music (as well as some of the crappiest things ever done, thanx Sir Paul) to a band not creating a NEW tune since Exile on Main Street

OK, case closed, even tho I LOVE Brian Jones' Stones, Beatles rules by far, there's no comparisson to start with other than they started at the same time.

Aw, and the "they still rock" argument is one of the things that decide me against them, get a grip and fucking quit robbing!

ArkansasDave · 01-04-2006, 03:27 PM

Close one, but prolly have to go with the Stones ...

bhutocracy · 01-04-2006, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alan-l

you gotta be kiddin. First, if it's for "artsy", then let's forget about the best Stones songs, those from the Brian Jones era. After that, they made a couple of good tunes and then... repeat year, after year, after year, after year. No surprise Keith Richards said "there's only one song in the air". At least in his head is a proven fact

If it's for edge, I would never, ever listen a band of 60 years old grandpas pluggin a Telecaster trying to look cool and playing the same song for... 40 FUCKING YEARS!!!

then your first statement is hilarious, you're comparing composers which in their solo careers took very different and definite ways, making some incredible music (as well as some of the crappiest things ever done, thanx Sir Paul) to a band not creating a NEW tune since Exile on Main Street

OK, case closed, even tho I LOVE Brian Jones' Stones, Beatles rules by far, there's no comparisson to start with other than they started at the same time.

Aw, and the "they still rock" argument is one of the things that decide me against them, get a grip and fucking quit robbing!

SOoooo true. The stones aren't even in the same class as the beatles. As for not breaking up.. jesus.. since when has that ever been a virtue with the bland crap they've pumped out for the last 20 years? They don't say "It's far better to burn out than to fade away" for nothing. The Hives - a blatant stones rip off is making better stones music than they have in the last 2 decades.

ContentSHOOTER · 01-04-2006, 04:16 PM

The Stones have my vote...

Babagirls · 01-04-2006, 04:17 PM

apples.....oranges......but i voted for the beatles.

HarlotCash Dyker · 01-04-2006, 04:24 PM

During my schooldays both were the biggest bands around, and it was also well known they were doing deals over new material release times -
Who was best? I don't know - I liked both - Both were from the uk and there wasn't a single band around who could touch them - Uk 2 usa 0

Sarah_Jayne · 01-04-2006, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhutocracy

The Hives - a blatant stones rip off is making better stones music than they have in the last 2 decades.

And even they really only have three songs they do over and over again in a slightly different tempo. Yet, they are entertaining.

Mikey_219Inc · 01-04-2006, 04:48 PM

thats a tight fucking race ... i wouldnt want to live without either

axelcat · 01-04-2006, 04:51 PM

The Beatles

xcitecash · 01-04-2006, 04:53 PM

I am From 1960's Liverpool so guess?

View Poll Results: Which do you think is better
The Beatles	49	63.64%
The Rolling Stones	26	33.77%
I only like Justin Limbercock's early music...	2	2.60%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

01-04-2006, 01:05 AM	#3
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	The stones are awesome, but they're not on the same level as The Beatles. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

01-04-2006, 01:14 AM	#6
je_rome Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 6,846	no contest...its The Beatles __________________ Make money on any traffic. Join KlikRevenue.com Today!

01-04-2006, 01:23 AM	#7
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	I picked the Beatles, but the Stones also pretty much rule too. __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

01-04-2006, 01:45 AM	#9
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	The Beatles for sure, by far the greatest band the world will ever see. __________________

01-04-2006, 12:40 AM	#1
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	Beatles or The Stones? ok here's the poll... __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

01-04-2006, 12:44 AM	#2
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	for same reasons as in thread #1

01-04-2006, 01:08 AM	#4
chaze Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 9,752	Beetles, hands down...

01-04-2006, 02:29 AM	#11
kenny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 7,245	The beatles by a long shot __________________ 7

01-04-2006, 02:41 AM	#12
Mr.Right - Banned For Life I guarantee it Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 18,314	The Stones by far. The Beatels would have to be one of the worst bands out. And i mean that in a nice way.

01-04-2006, 02:56 AM	#14
abyss_al LOOKING FOR TRADES Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Southern California Posts: 15,605	i hate the stones... __________________ EMAIL: allen @ vasmediagroup.com \| ICQ: 311329761 \| SKYPE: abyss.al \| AIM: xABYSSxALx

01-04-2006, 03:25 AM	#15
LittleSassy Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Location: behind you Posts: 7,402	rolling stones here... __________________ Proadultoutsourcing.com ~ version 2.0 OFFSHORE SOLUTIONS PROVIDER SINCE 2003 ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE 264-580-554

01-04-2006, 03:35 AM	#16
Your Mothers Secret Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 240	The Stones. How can the beatles be the superior band when they allowed their ego's and immaturity break up the band in 1970? The Stones longevity, dedication and determination make them the better band. They have given the world more music and all around entertainment. The beatles broke up the band over a period of arguments like a bunch of selfish kids. Regardless of their hits and radio propaganda they were selfish and immature.

01-04-2006, 04:02 AM	#17
PixeLs Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 11,922	Beatles, all the way! __________________ Make money on any traffic. Bi-weekly payments with no hold.

01-04-2006, 04:32 AM	#19
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	I like both but if I had to choose.... Beatles. The Stones may have longevity but the Beatles have versatility. It's hard to get bored of the Beatles. IMHO, at least. __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

01-04-2006, 04:36 AM	#20
ServerGenius Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 9,377	The beatles suck....girlie music too sweet the tragedies brought them eternal fame.....not their music. Free Beatle fact: They came up with the idea for the name The Beatles by Buddy Holly who's band was called The Crickets. Free Stones fact: Roling Stones drummer Charlie Watts never hits the hi-hat and snare at the same time. __________________ \| http://www.sinnerscash.com/ \| ICQ: 370820 \| Skype: SinnersCash \| AdultWhosWho \|

01-04-2006, 04:58 AM	#21
damonx Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Amazingpass.com Posts: 1,112	The Beatles __________________

01-04-2006, 05:22 AM	#22
reed_4 Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 9,640	Better? I say the Beatles is the best band. __________________

01-04-2006, 05:36 AM	#23
john77 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 181	Let´s rock! Only The Rolling Stones ! __________________ Hot East Europe Girls Chat&Cam Soft&HardCore,Chat&Cam,Amateur,Spied Girls and more on xxxtreams.com icq: 252075299

01-04-2006, 05:37 AM	#24
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	stones or the beatles? __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

01-04-2006, 05:49 AM	#25
Zhiro58 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: PornCreatives.com Posts: 648	Beatles forever... __________________ LOOKING FOR FULLTIME STAFF OR PER PROJECT DESIGNERS? CLICK HERE! ICQ: 496418723 EMAIL: ztef AT porncreatives.com 2008 XBIZ Awards Official Nominee for "Design Studio of the Year"

01-04-2006, 06:07 AM	#26
Trixie Racer Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: varies Posts: 2,328	Hard choice.. While I'd love the opprtunity to have been able to see the Beatles live, the Rolling Stones put on the best live show I ever saw. So, I'd have to go with the Stones.. __________________ Make a Red Cross Donation!

01-04-2006, 07:47 AM	#27
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	It depends on the song but I grew up as the kid of two Beatles fans so I am more or less always going to say them. However, I live about five minutes on foot from the train station with Jagger and Richards re-met each other before forming the Stones

01-04-2006, 07:48 AM	#28
Tapaz Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: CamCity Posts: 1,745	Motley Crue

01-04-2006, 07:49 AM	#30
TheLegacy SEO Connoisseur Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Brantford, Ontario Posts: 17,079	yes the stones music is good, but the beatles changed the face of music forever including how things are recorded and also in writing styles. __________________ SEO Connoisseur Microsoft Teams: Robert Warren SEO Telegram: @TheLegacy54 RobertWarrenSEO.com

01-04-2006, 09:25 AM	#31
Violetta Affiliate Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 28,735	I'm a beatles fan! __________________ M&A Queen

01-04-2006, 09:32 AM	#32
Pornopat AdultTubeSubmits.com Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 10,598	That would depend what kind of mood I am in. __________________ https://stripcash.com/sign-up/?userI...fff832eb95ab6a

01-04-2006, 09:39 AM	#33
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	I'll have to say the Beatles.

01-04-2006, 09:51 AM	#34
Thomas1007 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: BC Canada Posts: 5,542	The Beatles for sure __________________ BUY THIS SPOT CONTACT ME FOR DETAILS Contact Email

01-04-2006, 09:58 AM	#35
Manga1 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Malakiaville Posts: 952	The Stones by far. Much better sound than the Beatles. The Stones have an edge. The Beatles were too poppy. Sure the Beatles were a good band for their time,but the Stones are just on another level entirely.

01-04-2006, 12:41 PM	#37
GlydeGirl Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,516	Beatles!

01-04-2006, 12:42 PM	#38
BigCashCrew Registered User Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 3,570	I went with the Beatles. I love their music.. I'm going to put on Abbey Road now.

01-04-2006, 01:02 PM	#39
pornstar2pac Omaha Hi/Lo Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 17,380	Iron Maiden is better than both __________________ Trump haters gonna hate. that's all they can do

01-04-2006, 01:06 PM	#40
VicD ICQ: 304-611-162 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Masterdam Posts: 13,245	I'am a big fan of the Stones for over 25 years but i also like some of the Beatles' songs

01-04-2006, 03:27 PM	#42
ArkansasDave Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: San Diego, Ca Posts: 2,148	Close one, but prolly have to go with the Stones ... __________________ -ArkansasDave! ICQ: 759-84452 CDGirls.com Do It!