GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   When will designers learn? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=559556)

Elli 01-03-2006 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nilsy42
Are you allowed to use words like "sweeter" here???
Isn't that... close to blasphemic??

Alrighty then. It can make things look smoother and more professional.

woj 01-03-2006 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chio The Pirate
YARGH! For a good example of table less design, and how css can be used to completely alter a site in seconds go to www.csszengarden.com

Every one of those examples uses the same html. Only the css changes.

Check out what's being done with css2. Mind blowing stuff.

impressive :thumbsup

JD 01-03-2006 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj
impressive :thumbsup

that's what she said :upsidedow

Nilsy42 01-03-2006 12:34 PM

Smoother
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli
Alrighty then. It can make things look smoother and more professional.

So, honey bunny, you like it smooth....

All that's just design... Nothing in the CSS can't be made using normal stuff as I see it.
Everysingle piece of graphic content must be made somewhere, for example in Photoshop, and then saved somewhere, to be linked into the Site Page.
Whether that's done through CSS or regular HTML or whatever doesn't change the saved file.

The only thing so far that speaks in favour of the CSS, is as the Sperminator says, Dynamic content alterations.

I agree though, the designs used on those examples were very calm and tidy.

JD 01-03-2006 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nilsy42
So, honey bunny, you like it smooth....

All that's just design... Nothing in the CSS can't be made using normal stuff as I see it.
Everysingle piece of graphic content must be made somewhere, for example in Photoshop, and then saved somewhere, to be linked into the Site Page.
Whether that's done through CSS or regular HTML or whatever doesn't change the saved file.

The only thing so far that speaks in favour of the CSS, is as the Sperminator says, Dynamic content alterations.

I agree though, the designs used on those examples were very calm and tidy.

and overall page filesize which is a "tie breaker" in google :winkwink:

Nilsy42 01-03-2006 12:39 PM

Agreed!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
and overall page filesize which is a "tie breaker" in google :winkwink:

Yes... sorry, forgot that one... the most important really.
Crazy small file size!!!

Tom_PM 01-03-2006 12:39 PM

Dont forget, the internet standard is to use CSS for page layout. Thats a plus I'd say..
True, slicing gets sloppy sometimes. People dont think to use the same number of slices per row and column, so wind up with a million spacer gifs or spacer cells and they're ugly.

pornguy 01-03-2006 12:42 PM

I think that to use only one, CSS or tables is asking for issues. Way tooooooo many browsers support many different things. Using a combo will work the best.

DWB 01-03-2006 12:45 PM

im not trying to re-invent the wheel. i just want to sell porn. tables or css... the guy jacking off could care less how it was built. if you have shitty content, it doesnt matter how slick or dynamic your page is. if it loads fast, is easy to navigate and makes you money... you did your job.

what ever works best for you. just dont forget who your end user is.

asl 01-03-2006 12:49 PM

CSS and MGPs don't match at all ;)

sickkittens 01-03-2006 12:50 PM

Probably in 50 days or when woj says so.

JD 01-03-2006 12:51 PM

fidy tables

edit: :mad:

JD 01-03-2006 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asl
CSS and MGPs don't match at all ;)

why's that?

sixxxthsense 01-03-2006 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
Tables are for newbs. And make life hell :mad:

100% CSS


its okay boys he thinks he's L33T!!!!! :1orglaugh

JD 01-03-2006 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
its okay boys he thinks he's L33T!!!!! :1orglaugh

troll :upsidedow

sixxxthsense 01-03-2006 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
troll :upsidedow

you got me, with your pistol shot me shot me. :thumbsup

JD 01-03-2006 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
you got me, with your pistol shot me shot me. :thumbsup

jesus man. hook me up with your dealer :helpme

sixxxthsense 01-03-2006 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
jesus man. hook me up with your dealer :helpme

its just a natural high man!

JD 01-03-2006 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
its just a natural high man!

weed? shrooms? peyote? they're all natural highs :winkwink:

Claude 01-03-2006 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fetishblog
Opera 8.5, Firefox 1.5, and IE 6.x all support varying levels of CSS. I bet any site you design using solely CSS will look different under every browser. Now with that said, every browser supports tables. :)

:thumbsup

scrm 01-03-2006 03:47 PM

Sperminator you have no clue about design, so shut the fuck up. Tables are not for noobs. Tables + CSS = perfect design. Please try 100% CSS & div-based design on older versions of browsers like many users working with and tell me what you see. Nothing? Yeah.

Elli 01-03-2006 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nilsy42
So, honey bunny, you like it smooth....

All that's just design... Nothing in the CSS can't be made using normal stuff as I see it.
Everysingle piece of graphic content must be made somewhere, for example in Photoshop, and then saved somewhere, to be linked into the Site Page.
Whether that's done through CSS or regular HTML or whatever doesn't change the saved file.

The only thing so far that speaks in favour of the CSS, is as the Sperminator says, Dynamic content alterations.

I agree though, the designs used on those examples were very calm and tidy.

I'm going to pretend you calling me "honey bunny" wasn't condescending.

CSS is an internet standard that is keeping with the times, and makes changing the look of a site a snap. So it means my future updates will be super easy. That's enough of a temptation for me to look into it and get myself current. That and tables are a bloody headache to decipher from code.

Nilsy42 01-03-2006 04:00 PM

Just kidding
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli
I'm going to pretend you calling me "honey bunny" wasn't condescending.

CSS is an internet standard that is keeping with the times, and makes changing the look of a site a snap. So it means my future updates will be super easy. That's enough of a temptation for me to look into it and get myself current. That and tables are a bloody headache to decipher from code.

Just kidding!
I agree, and will be digging more into CSS myself. I wasn't aware that it could be used so global as those designs showed.
So far I've only used CSS for texts and colour scheme stuff, but never on design stuff.

JD 01-03-2006 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scrm
Sperminator you have no clue about design, so shut the fuck up. Tables are not for noobs. Tables + CSS = perfect design. Please try 100% CSS & div-based design on older versions of browsers like many users working with and tell me what you see. Nothing? Yeah.

swallow my cock. If you took the 2 seconds to READ the thread you'd see that I took back the 100% CSS

go jump up someone elses ass, penguin fucker. :321GFY

Elli 01-03-2006 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nilsy42
Just kidding!
I agree, and will be digging more into CSS myself. I wasn't aware that it could be used so global as those designs showed.
So far I've only used CSS for texts and colour scheme stuff, but never on design stuff.

Good luck with your coding. :)

And I would advise not to call women pet names unless you already have their consent.

JD 01-03-2006 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli
Good luck with your coding. :)

And I would advise not to call women pet names unless you already have their consent.

sweetie pie :upsidedow

Elli 01-03-2006 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
sweetie pie :upsidedow

sweetiemuffincakes

JD 01-03-2006 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli
sweetiemuffincakes

snuggle bunny bunches :1orglaugh

Nilsy42 01-03-2006 05:13 PM

???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
snuggle bunny bunches :1orglaugh

Is this a threesome, or you guys gonna get a room without me? :disgust

ssp 01-03-2006 05:23 PM

I use XHTML 1.0 Strict + CSS/CSS2 for all websites I make.

Elli 01-03-2006 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nilsy42
Is this a threesome, or you guys gonna get a room without me? :disgust

No, you can come too, Mr. Sexy Stuff.

JD 01-03-2006 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli
No, you can come too, Mr. Sexy Stuff.

hmmm....i guess he can join in the fun...ain't nuthin goin in my ass though :2 cents:

Nilsy42 01-04-2006 04:16 AM

Great
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR
hmmm....i guess he can join in the fun...ain't nuthin goin in my ass though :2 cents:

:1orglaugh

Nilsy42 01-04-2006 04:18 AM

Fanrific
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Elli
No, you can come too, Mr. Sexy Stuff.

Eh...heh... I came already... :Oh crap

$5 submissions 01-04-2006 04:26 AM

The Mozart one kicks ass

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chio The Pirate
YARGH! For a good example of table less design, and how css can be used to completely alter a site in seconds go to www.csszengarden.com

Every one of those examples uses the same html. Only the css changes.

Check out what's being done with css2. Mind blowing stuff.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123