GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ever tried ecstasy? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=559103)

dunefield 01-03-2006 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno
What's wrong with MDA if you are looking for MDMA? 99.9% of people would NEVER know the difference between MDMA, MDE and MDA unless they were looking for it or knew what to look for.

agreed...

Pornwolf 01-03-2006 07:47 PM

Someone on here sure knows a lot about a lot of different drugs. I wonder how he knows so much if he never tried em or sold em... or busted those that did.

shahab6 01-03-2006 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
You'd be suprised what some people use in fertilizer when growing weed... sometimes pissing in the dirt also :2 cents:

so don't think "non man made" drugs are any better :1orglaugh

you better hope the guy you buy your weed from washes the bug killer shit off of the plants :1orglaugh

Thats why I believe most drugs should be legalize, so the goverment can regulate it. This way when your buying something you know what your getting. People are going to buy drugs even if its illegal, so why not regulate it?

NoCarrier 01-03-2006 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno
What's wrong with MDA if you are looking for MDMA? 99.9% of people would NEVER know the difference between MDMA, MDE and MDA unless they were looking for it or knew what to look for.

Why? Because MDA is not MDMA. It's closely related but it's more psychedelic, much stronger and acts differently. You seem to know your stuff but you are clueless about the differences between MDA and MDMA? WTF?

shahab6 01-03-2006 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoCarrier
Why? Because MDA is not MDMA. It's closely related but it's more psychedelic, much stronger and acts differently. You seem to know your stuff but you are clueless about the differences between MDA and MDMA? WTF?

Most people don't mine if they get MDA instead of MDMA, its close enough

uno 01-03-2006 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoCarrier
Why? Because MDA is not MDMA. It's closely related but it's more psychedelic, much stronger and acts differently. You seem to know your stuff but you are clueless about the differences between MDA and MDMA? WTF?

I know the differences between them. My point was that they are basically the same thing to the layperson. Getting MDA or MDE instead of MDMA would not mean a lick of difference to the vast majority of people. They are close enough in effects that no one would know the difference. If a regular person asked for e, any of the 3 would be acceptable. If a person asked specifically for MDMA and received one of the other 2, they would almost certainly have no idea. While the MDE or MDA wouldn't be exactly what they asked for it would not present any large difference in subjective experience, health consequence or effects. Differences yes, but marginal.

robfantasy 01-03-2006 09:24 PM

e now is shit

the rave scene is dead

good clean mdma is hard to obtain

if u were lucky enough to experience mdma back in the day than there is no way you can downplay its effects.

the e now a days is weak as shit and usually contains very very little mdma

fuck the mutherfuckers who fucked it up for everyone else

uno 01-03-2006 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy
e now is shit

the rave scene is dead

good clean mdma is hard to obtain

if u were lucky enough to experience mdma back in the day than there is no way you can downplay its effects.

the e now a days is weak as shit and usually contains very very little mdma

fuck the mutherfuckers who fucked it up for everyone else

That's why you need to make connections with chemists and other various people who get 100% pure powder. :winkwink:

shahab6 01-03-2006 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy
e now is shit

the rave scene is dead

good clean mdma is hard to obtain

if u were lucky enough to experience mdma back in the day than there is no way you can downplay its effects.

the e now a days is weak as shit and usually contains very very little mdma

fuck the mutherfuckers who fucked it up for everyone else

If you look, you can still find good E, I guess it depends on who you know.
Right now Rx drugs(oxy,benzod,etc) are popular, its easer to get and its pure.

Pornwolf 01-03-2006 09:40 PM

That sounds like dangerous thing to do Uno. What if a formulation is made wrong? Or worse yet, they are fronts for the feds?

I don't think drugs are worth that. Drugs are bad mmmkay.

reed_4 01-03-2006 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
That sounds like dangerous thing to do Uno. What if a formulation is made wrong? Or worse yet, they are fronts for the feds?

I don't think drugs are worth that. Drugs are bad mmmkay.

I agree, it kills. :(

uno 01-03-2006 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
That sounds like dangerous thing to do Uno. What if a formulation is made wrong? Or worse yet, they are fronts for the feds?

I don't think drugs are worth that. Drugs are bad mmmkay.

Testing, testing testing. Things go bad, the stuff is tossed.

Sam Granger 01-03-2006 11:24 PM

Dont use xtc. Its usually full of crap and can kill. I've a friend who died of using it.

Pornwolf 01-03-2006 11:31 PM

I know a guy who shit out his spinal fluid.

No shit. It's true.

Pornwolf 01-03-2006 11:33 PM

I know another guy who took so much E that he fucked his mom.

It happens.

Pornwolf 01-03-2006 11:33 PM

This, my friends, is how bad drug rumors start. Heh heh

Tat2Jr 01-04-2006 12:08 AM

I'm going to SOOOO age myself here....

I haven't done MDA or MDMA since it came in POWDER FORM!!! You use to buy it in quarters like coke. If I hadn't seen TV specials, and knew it only came in pill form now, and tried to buy some I'd tell the guy to try and scam someone else.

Bill8 01-04-2006 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tat2Jr
MDA or MDMA since it came in POWDER FORM!!!

Those were the days.

A gram, a girl, the inner adventure of a lifetime.

NoCarrier 01-04-2006 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno
I know the differences between them. My point was that they are basically the same thing to the layperson. Getting MDA or MDE instead of MDMA would not mean a lick of difference to the vast majority of people. They are close enough in effects that no one would know the difference. If a regular person asked for e, any of the 3 would be acceptable. If a person asked specifically for MDMA and received one of the other 2, they would almost certainly have no idea. While the MDE or MDA wouldn't be exactly what they asked for it would not present any large difference in subjective experience, health consequence or effects. Differences yes, but marginal.

My point was not about the fact that people won't know the difference between real MDMA and someone selling them MDA, but the fact is that most pills do not contain MDMA anymore (The Real XTC, The Real Shit).

I know what you mean, I've seen noobs take speed and act like it was the best XTC experience ever..

You wanted to argue with me about something we all agree on.. Like.. Hello?

drjones 01-04-2006 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shahab6
There is no heroin in E, H is too expensive to put in E, and you have to eat large dose to feel the effect of H. E is mix with cheap drugs to increase the profit of whoever is making it. It does not make sense to put expensive drugs in it.
Sorry to hear about your friend, abuse of drugs can be very bad for the mind and body of the user. Thats why you need to use in moderation (most people do use in moderation, but there are few who start to abuse drugs, which gives the drug a bad name, and the people who use it.)

Lots of times a cheap low grade opiate will be mixed in with pills, that give it the smack feeling... like codeine. This is what leads to the H myth. People perpetuate it; makes the users feel more hardcore or something, and the anti-drug movement has something to scare people with.

GlydeGirl 01-04-2006 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shahab6
Thats why I believe most drugs should be legalize, so the goverment can regulate it. This way when your buying something you know what your getting. People are going to buy drugs even if its illegal, so why not regulate it?

You have WAY too much confidence in your government! What makes you think they would take your own best interests to heart when it comes to narcotics when they have no problems approving killer prescription drugs like Vioxx and Fenphen? It's ALL about the money!

They'd either step on the shit so much you wouldn't even get high, or they'd let the pharmaceutical companies cut the stuff with even MORE addicting drugs so that you keep them in business making more money!

shahab6 01-05-2006 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaskTVMaura
You have WAY too much confidence in your government! What makes you think they would take your own best interests to heart when it comes to narcotics when they have no problems approving killer prescription drugs like Vioxx and Fenphen? It's ALL about the money!

They'd either step on the shit so much you wouldn't even get high, or they'd let the pharmaceutical companies cut the stuff with even MORE addicting drugs so that you keep them in business making more money!

I doubt if it becomes legal pharmaceutical companies will cut it with something else, thats the whole point of the government regulating it, so companys will not cut it. Plus if the company adds something extra in the drug, they must write it on the label, and if the consumer does not like whats in it, they can buy from another company.
Once drugs become legal, there is not much money in it, so i don't think big pharmaceutical company will produce it.

ULjamie 11-26-2006 06:25 PM

Marriage counselors used to use MDMA before it became illegal. Disfunctional couples could get more accomplished in a four hour session than in 6 months of counseling.

s9ann0 11-26-2006 06:34 PM

I think its BS people cut e's with ket! yerrite

E$_manager 11-26-2006 06:42 PM

I never thought it is better than weed. It is chemical, that is why i am not going to try it.

nikki99 11-26-2006 06:44 PM

I did but is too strong for me, nothing beats the cocaine :)

Ohface 11-26-2006 06:46 PM

I haven't tried and I don't intend to either.

kezia 11-26-2006 06:47 PM

Expensive!! No way!!

bootleg 11-26-2006 06:49 PM

pills kill people

chemicals are toxic to the human body

stev0 11-26-2006 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold (Post 8976502)
Never tried it, but they say that this drug is very dangerous and could cause heart attack. :(

Nah, it's not that dangerous... You have about the same chance of having a heart attack after drinking a coffee.

It's fun, but like all drugs should be taken in moderation.

woj 11-26-2006 06:52 PM

150......... :)

stev0 11-26-2006 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bootleg (Post 11398433)
pills kill people

chemicals are toxic to the human body

Look up the definition of toxic before you post any more tidbits of wisdom.

bootleg 11-26-2006 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 11398453)
Look up the definition of toxic before you post any more tidbits of wisdom.

tox‧ic  /ˈtɒksɪk/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[tok-sik] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
?adjective
1. of, pertaining to, affected with, or caused by a toxin or poison: a toxic condition.
2. acting as or having the effect of a poison; poisonous: a toxic drug.
?noun
3. a toxic chemical or other substance.

stupid crackheads

stev0 11-26-2006 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bootleg (Post 11398462)
tox‧ic  /ˈtɒksɪk/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[tok-sik] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. of, pertaining to, affected with, or caused by a toxin or poison: a toxic condition.
2. acting as or having the effect of a poison; poisonous: a toxic drug.
–noun
3. a toxic chemical or other substance.

stupid crackheads

You just proved my point... mdma is not a toxin, a toxin has the effect of a poison which is defined as "a substance with an inherent property that tends to destroy life or impair health".

Mdma is a psychoactive stimulant.

ps. I'm more intelligent than you, and i've never tried crack, smartass

budz 11-26-2006 07:16 PM

lsd > xtc
.;

nikki99 11-26-2006 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bootleg (Post 11398433)
pills kill people

chemicals are toxic to the human body

no wai :helpme

stev0 11-26-2006 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budz (Post 11398584)
lsd > xtc
.;

It's definately stronger, thats for sure ;) But completely different.

Lauren 11-26-2006 07:22 PM

i never tried and i will never try...

Lykos 11-26-2006 07:33 PM

Yes offcourse i am,i love ex:)

jacklaidlaw 11-26-2006 07:44 PM

I used to take xtc about 4 time s a week for a year, I never liked it the very first time I sort of freaked out a bit after that is great until I started getting massive come downs, I thought my friends were planning shit behind my back, People talking about me it was all imaginary but it does fuck you after a while and now I would rather slash my balls with a razor than take another one as I get no feeling from them. You cannot get atticted to them but you can feel as if you want them every night. These people posting in htis thread that have never took them are just going with what the government says. No one ever says the positives about drugs in school and things like that. E makes you happy in a way you could never imagine think of your happier memory and times it by ten it really is that good, Just don't take them all the time


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123