Government Files Motion To Dismiss In 2257 Case - GoFuckYourself.com

Redrob · 12-28-2005, 04:47 PM

Mark Kernes has written an analysis of the DOJ's motion to dismiss and posted it on the FSC website.

Mark writes,

DENVER - The first sentence of the U.S. Department of Justice's Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of Free Speech Coalition (FSC) v. Gonzales reads, "Plaintiffs? 32-count challenge to 18 U.S.C. §2257 and its implementing regulations establishes only that the number of claims in a complaint does not reflect their merit." Not the most auspicious or substantive beginning to a motion which the government undoubtedly hopes will kill the adult industry as we know it ? and what follows tracks both the government's anger with the industry and its lack of firm ground upon which to challenge FSC's arguments.

For the entire article, click here

Harmon · 12-28-2005, 04:50 PM

yup - posted yesterday

Redrob · 12-28-2005, 04:53 PM

This article has much more in depth background, a discussion of the ramifications of the motion and much more. The article is a little long; but, as usual, Mark has written and excellent analysis of the situation.

12-28-2005, 04:47 PM	#1
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	Government Files Motion To Dismiss In 2257 Case Mark Kernes has written an analysis of the DOJ's motion to dismiss and posted it on the FSC website. Mark writes, DENVER - The first sentence of the U.S. Department of Justice's Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of Free Speech Coalition (FSC) v. Gonzales reads, "Plaintiffs? 32-count challenge to 18 U.S.C. §2257 and its implementing regulations establishes only that the number of claims in a complaint does not reflect their merit." Not the most auspicious or substantive beginning to a motion which the government undoubtedly hopes will kill the adult industry as we know it ? and what follows tracks both the government's anger with the industry and its lack of firm ground upon which to challenge FSC's arguments. For the entire article, click here

12-28-2005, 04:50 PM	#2
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,010	yup - posted yesterday __________________ [email protected]

12-28-2005, 04:53 PM	#3
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	This article has much more in depth background, a discussion of the ramifications of the motion and much more. The article is a little long; but, as usual, Mark has written and excellent analysis of the situation.