As promised, THE BRIDGE - Merry XMAS - :)

You can't really dispute those findings

"Poor little woggie -- you've had a tough spell, eh --

Don't be scared, it's yummmmeeeee...."





2hp

Why why why....spoil good things?

Damn, you know what the rabbit hole goes much deeper than you can see there fore who is the one that is not really seeing the light?

Shift gears and let the mind expand....lol

oh and name calling is not allowed...on this information playground....

If you take none of the technical details away from the article, take this:

"Most adult webmasters have it in their heads that they should shoot for the moon in terms of page rank for every site they operate. This approach inevitably leads to the temptation of 'shortcuts,' such as linking to your new sites from your established sites in an attempt to boost their page rank or engaging in any of a number of practices that attempt to gain Google page rank by making something look better than it is."

Not all your blogs can be 4-star generals, you have to have some grunt privates in there, and be prepared to sacrifice them on the "front lines" -- here's one of my most valued gruntblogs -- MYFASHIONGIRL



2hp

Somewhat related to the idea above, is being prepared to "let go" of a blog that's holding you back. For example, my main "porn blog" at blog.impoverishednoobs.com is being prepared for "archival mode" -- this is what I am calling it when you stop actively posting to a blog, and shift into a mode where you are taking complete advantage of all the content and links in an "old but good" blog and making that the basis on which to create a new blog. Right now I am making a new blog in another subdomain of impoverishednoobs.com. Although this is a wholly separate blog (not even sharing a SQL DB), it will be very tightly integrated into the old workhorse. The result will be a macro-blog, with an established, thoroughly Google-Indexed content warehouse, and a shiny new front end with all the latest whistles, as well as all the ideas that I could not execute on the old blog. In this manner, you can keep adding new front ends, building onto the content/link "asset" and never lose PR, in fact, probably gain -- ALL ON A SINGLE DOMAIN --


2hp

Since the whole idea here is that you are using several blogs together to achieve an effect, you might wonder how exactly the links are made between them -- I'll go into that later. But, I just wanted to say that it's much easier if you post to all of the blogs at the same time. This way you can track through the link sequence (just like the Spider is going to) and make sure you are #1) adhering to the rules about linking up and #2) adding a little something to the page that came before, in terms of descriptive value. One way to do this without too much thought and no extra text is to create two parallel paths between, let's say your "ad" and your pre-sign-up page gallery. Parallel paths would be link sequences that anchor from the same folder location. For example two pages of text in the same folder each linking to two thumbnail galleries in the same folder would be considered parallel paths. The spider likes this because it gets two different perspectives of the same content. The Parallel path concept can be scaled to make the anchor points the same sub.domain, or the same domain, or the same IP, when you are working with larger networks.


2hp

more hot air than came out of my ass two days ago when i had food poisoning

Here's a great blog:





2hp

nice the way of thinking guys

Well, at least the Trolls & Detractors whose flamed corpses litter the fore-thread had the good sense to drop their sigs for link fodder and go. But what of the Admirers in the GFY-Lurking ranks?

Some of you are sitting on personal asset bases you're understandably not eager to link to "pornography". But others of you, I'll wager, are not quite so "definitively organized" in your wealth or professional houses to pass up an oppurtunity to grow wealth and enlarge your businesses via -- fame

You think Paul or Marc or Rick objected to this -- not a bit --

The time is right the Media are hungry for images and stories with a tinge of controversy. Or haven't you noticed the total polarization of stories covered in the press to Surrealized Horror and Surrealized Sex.

Step up.

Watch MikeHawk become the most visible "pornographer" at Internext with this. No fool, Mike. No, sir --


Tell ya what, if any body from the Executive/Managerial/Owner ranks wants to give me a stably-hosted image I can hotlink to under the name porn_STAR.png with a width of 400 pixels, I'll do nice things with it. We can even do it private-wise, if you like: 196-767-065


2hp

Right fucking on....ramping up for the super kick ass year! Out of the way and fasten your seat belts....coming fast and hard.

Thanks Jack!

The site's looking good, Mike. Tell us about some of the special features and how they'll support your marketing objectives at Internext --


2hp

Well Jack, if you really must know....lol.....ok here we go, here is a nice sound bite or quote for ya!


"I want to let the world have a look at porn, say 'Here we are' -- the market is interested in us, in our expertise converting traffic and in our innovative companies. I want smashbucks to be on that list"

Here's a little trick you can do just about anywhere. I call it the Sweetheart Pass:


This joins the source blog to the attributing blog, via an alternative parallel path of a very macro sort, and joins both posts to a larger context of pages, terms and links --

This is particularly sweet in this example, because the story being cited on Mike's blog is about Mike's blog.

2hp

All is good in Vegas thanks, we even had freezing rain today.

I have been spending a lot of time lately playing with my privates so I can relate to some of your ideas.

I trust you are getting closer to securing a room for the show.

Alas, no.



2hp

"Translation" is also an important area of opportunity. Things, which to us are obviously related, may not be to the blind...




HENDRIX PURPLE HAZE

HENDRIX PURPLE HAZE

SPIDERESE



2hp

nice bridge pic.

2hp

I love this pic

1,000 words, baby.



2hp

damn nuke fans... they're EVERYWHERE --





2hp

Bump it up!!

Anybody think I'm full of shit?




2hp

Looks like we may have to send you an overage rate chart pretty soon.

Merry Xmas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bunch of haters around here. Fucking monkeys.

thanks 2HP

overage --


Tx, bd -- it's no hyperbole to say that http://www.gotwebhost.com shares in this success. If your webmastering at all considers Spiderese, you'll find exceptional support at every level from goodgirl and baddog. The best part is they never once made me feel special -- meaning, it's obvious the service they gave me is the same as the service they give all their customers. --


2hp

T3Report beats them all.

ummm, it's late, I am tired . . . are you saying a trackback to himself or something else?

Well, the protocol is the attributed blog should be the more senior, which in this case is mine, so that is fine. Mike, would normally link to me, having excerpted me. And I would not be able to link to Mike. I might not even know Mike, he might have just found my blog and liked the story. But, when you have a friend named Mike with a blog, or just two blogs, you can arrange it so the subject of the article is the bloogging blog, and (THEREFORE) also being blogged -- make sense. This throws the spider for a tizzy. I guess this is a good time to say that just making the spider have to look at something really hard, becasue it's never seen anytrhing like that is a good thing --


2hp

It should be no secret to anyone at this point that there IS a difference between blogroll links and link in posts.



Google is EXTREMELY familiar with the structure of vBulletin. There are tens of thousands of well-indexed vB boards out there. When it comes in here, it already knows what a sig is -- and think about, just logically -- if there is this wad of code in the same place every time you post, and the spider sees it is there whenever "you" are there, it simply integrates into You. Like If I am a doctor, I know what a hand is, I have studied-up on hands real good in anatomy class. When I new patient comes into my office, I don't run to him in amazement and wonder what those 5-pointed things are at the ends of his arms. I presume to look for DIFFERENCE -- "How is this specimen NOT like the rest?" The doctor thus forms his diagnosis, the spider its place for you in its heart.

Links in posts are where a blogger would indicate his INTENTIONS, his ACTIVE VOLITION AND PREJUDICES would be in evidence there. Those are the things that blogsbyhumans have plenty of. Now, the blogroll on that there blog, is not link any blogroll you've ever seen --


2hp

Well, you have completely succeeded in confusing me

Whoops, sorry about that. Let's try that again.

Long before blogs and blogging had reached the staggering popularity they have today, there

was an understanding of Reciprocal Linking in the Adult Biz. Simple "You gimme a link, I'll

give ya a link" evolved into complex scripts that balance not only for volume but for

converting "quality", developed by some of the most talented innovators in all of e-marketing,

people who post right here on this board. Later, a greater awareness of SEO principles

introduced relative PR into the list of issues you had to consider when you recipped with

another site. The impact of linking relationships between blogs, both to their respective

Page Rankings AND the WAYS in which the SE's will index them is built on the principles of

Relevancy (an arithmetical calculus), BUT also begin to integrate some of the new principles

of TRUST. TRUST IS REPLACING RELEVANCY, FYI, as the basis of Page Rank. See PDF linked

above.

To continue with the example of my blog (*******************.com) and Mike's new blog

(internextlive.com), we have an imbalance of PR, an imbalance of "maturity" (DB size/# of

posts) and an imbalance of age (inception date).

Normally, all that would be recommended is the now conventional "blogging it" link, which

happens when a blogger wants to excerpt another blogger's post on his site. As I describe in

the article, you should always link up, never down (save for the loophole 5:1). Google

rewards this when done right, because #1) you have proven yourself capable of identifying

"quality" (as determined by the Spider's opinion of the site you choose to link to), and #2)

because you are adding descriptive value to a pre-existing item in the index. You do this

with a "more" link on the basic end of the spectrum, or more complexly, via careful selection

of anchor text for the link to the single-post permalink of the article you are blogging.

That would be as illustrated by link 1. in the sketch below.




However (and I can already here my Uber-rationalist friends from across the pond and up north begin

to froth at the mouth), something rather trippy happens when two blogs recip as

illustrated in link 2. Remember, blogs are not expected to be in a (let's call it) "tight" recip

with other blogs. By tight recip I mean post-to-post. A "loose" recip would be

[blogA/post5]>[blogB/post33]:[blogB/post40]>[blogA/post7], for example. There is a formula in

the PDF above that lets you resolve a hard value for TrustRank from such a relationship. But

the beauty of TrustRank is it's intuitive, assuming you have any familiarity with trust or

bein trusted -- lol.

Look at at this way: The senior blog has conferred "trustability" upon the junior blog by

linking to it from an ORIGINAL post (that's KEY), which the junior blog has blogged. If the

senior blog just blogged one of the junior blogs posts, that would (under most circumstances)

violate TrustRank and hurt the Senior blog, and do nothing for the junior blog. This gets

around that --


2hp

Let's make this simple.

The ultimate reciprocal link in blogging is called the trackback.

You can not trackback to yourself. In this post ( http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...6&postcount=64 ) it appeared to me that was what you were trying to accomplish.

That is where you lost me.

No, that's completely different. What I did above was, essentially force a liason between elements by bringing them together inside a "content unit" (a blog post, a BBS post, etc.) and other elements which would add definition to that liason for being indexed.

It's like if I don't know Harry and I know Joe and I know that Joe has a friend Sam who speaks French, and I see Harry and Joe and Sam in a room, speaking French, it tells me something about all of them that I did not know.


2hp

Well, to be precise, unless one is signing, and you can sign in French, you can't really see anyone speaking French. So, if you hear Harry speaking French you know that about him no matter what Joe or Sam are doing, no matter their relationship.

I guess I just don't get it . . . but would not be the first time.

Oh, you know what I mean, silly.


2hp

Hi,

I've just made some changes that will at least double the traffic to this site:



Within 5 days.


Watch --


2hp

"DivisionTrust"

Line-making and Line-tending in Light of Trustrank

Keys are for "doors".

To cross a bridge, all you need is to pay the toll --

hi! nice read... you hvae established good arguments and i must agree with some of them.

Dont be a troll Jack ! only trolls want a fee to cross the bridge

i am the bridge

aha you bumped this old thread... thats surprising

always a little bit of time left out there

me too...another bridge

You sir are insane. Coming from someone that is trying to make sense of it all thanks.

but, of couse, totally insane in a good way

100.....