You stupid sigwhore fuck. The day you get banned will be a good day.

I have never heard of Rado before?

DH

The rado looks very 80's.

nice looking, but proabbly a total waste of money.

Meh, I don't like it.

Yeah I just went to the site and saw the prices for these Rado watches. Total waste of money. I don't know much money you make, but 14K seems like its out of most peoples price range.

2 faggish yo

fucking ugly

metrosexual :winkwink:

I wear a $80 watch, and I get more compliments on it than I did with my $500 watch....

It's funny, 90% of the people out there have no fucking clue what kind of watch is expensive or not if you pick a decent style..

If you are gonna shell out that kind of dough, go for a Movado. I love mine (thanksfully I didnt pay for it) but they are IMO hands down perfect combination of classy bling with a minimalist look that you will find. Say more with less.

note to myself; rado is a no-no, wait with buying a Rolex till at least 45 and never ask for an opinion about any other expensive watch on gfy

I guess a Rolls Royce is now over rated too because its design is not "new" :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :helpme

It's about quality and prestige..same reason people buy Lambo's and Ferrari's.

....that thing will tick for 1,000,000 years.

My Breitling looks a lot like that one, but mine doesn't have the diamonds.

For the record, I didn't really like any of the watches in this thread.

I agree 100%. But I guarantee you that it's easier to impress with a nice $500 watch than with a $80 one.

I have 3 watches right now. 1 Guess that I paid $80, 1 Swiss Army that I paid $600 and one Breitling that I paid a little over $2,000 I think.

I'm looking to buy a Emporio Armani next week, I just want to make sure it has saphire glass before I buy it. I hate the way my Guess looks all scratched, just because it is my everyday watch.

:)