Rick Salomon Sues LFP for $5 Mil - Flynt doesn't have permission to broadcast,he says - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Fucksakes · 12-09-2005, 11:39 PM

50

sig spot #2, can you see it?

J$tyle$ · 12-10-2005, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw

Hey look at me@@@@@@@@@@@@@

stev0 · 12-10-2005, 12:40 AM

So... i've always wondered, does Rick Saloman or RedLight have a signed model release from Paris? If not, then they don't really have any rights to distribute this video either and would be breaking both the old and new USC 2257 by doing so.

Just a little curiosity brain fart.

emthree · 12-10-2005, 02:18 AM

Funny how this thread refocused all of it's attention.

JFK · 12-10-2005, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rml1608

I would think of it as a huge joke if it was something like $25 Million ...

But given he was smart enough to keep the amount he was seeking low (yeah, for nowadays that IS low) it's more of a concern then if it was some over inflated extortion situation... Either way, lawyers always win big in these situations.

Best of luck to everyone involved..

well this also could be a publicity stunt, to get the suckers out there to buy

In the end all the parties settle and laugh all the way to the bank

J$tyle$ · 12-10-2005, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

well this also could be a publicity stunt, to get the suckers out there to buy

In the end all the parties settle and laugh all the way to the bank

that wouldn't be too dumb if it was the case although I'm doubting it is

TheGoldenChild · 12-10-2005, 11:36 AM

Why would anyone think that Redlight ,Hotel Heiress, or Rick would be marketing a tape that has no 2257?

For the last time- all webmasters here should be smart enough to know from 2257 laws
They should also be smart enough to know that every 1 Night In Paris boxcover has a 2257 stamp- as well as XPAYS is fully compliant.

Rick has been fucked by almost everyone that ever touched this tape- from Donald Thrasher to some of the biggest web sites on the internet-

Just like the 20/20 piece on Copyright Infringement last night stated about Starbucks-
when one has a valid trademark- it must be enforced to the fullest extent of the law- any infringers should be held liable.

I am sure that Hustler would have done all their due diligence on this tape an I am sure there had to be some kind of oversight.

There is a similar lawsuit filed against Hustler in regards to a Lil John sex video as well.
I am sure there will be happy resolution to all of this.

J$tyle$ · 12-10-2005, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kBizzle

Why would anyone think that Redlight ,Hotel Heiress, or Rick would be marketing a tape that has no 2257?

For the last time- all webmasters here should be smart enough to know from 2257 laws
They should also be smart enough to know that every 1 Night In Paris boxcover has a 2257 stamp- as well as XPAYS is fully compliant.

word

RogerV · 12-10-2005, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays

This is factual.

But who brought it to the internet? And broke the story

Brujah · 12-11-2005, 12:13 AM

You can also promote the Paris Hilton video with Guba.
http://www.guba.com/

J$tyle$ · 12-11-2005, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerV

But who brought it to the internet? And broke the story

QuaWee · 12-11-2005, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah

You can also promote the Paris Hilton video with Guba.
http://www.guba.com/

J$tyle$ · 12-11-2005, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuaWee

I'm sure he'll be coming after them sooner or later

12-10-2005, 02:18 AM	#54
emthree Dialer Kingpin Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: New York Posts: 10,816	Funny how this thread refocused all of it's attention. __________________ • Sell Patches & Pills •

12-10-2005, 11:36 AM	#57
TheGoldenChild Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Pacific Palisades Posts: 6,940	Why would anyone think that Redlight ,Hotel Heiress, or Rick would be marketing a tape that has no 2257? For the last time- all webmasters here should be smart enough to know from 2257 laws They should also be smart enough to know that every 1 Night In Paris boxcover has a 2257 stamp- as well as XPAYS is fully compliant. Rick has been fucked by almost everyone that ever touched this tape- from Donald Thrasher to some of the biggest web sites on the internet- Just like the 20/20 piece on Copyright Infringement last night stated about Starbucks- when one has a valid trademark- it must be enforced to the fullest extent of the law- any infringers should be held liable. I am sure that Hustler would have done all their due diligence on this tape an I am sure there had to be some kind of oversight. There is a similar lawsuit filed against Hustler in regards to a Lil John sex video as well. I am sure there will be happy resolution to all of this. __________________

12-11-2005, 12:13 AM	#60
Brujah Beer Money Baron Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: brujah / gmail Posts: 22,157	You can also promote the Paris Hilton video with Guba. http://www.guba.com/ __________________ Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com For Sale: Obscenity.com

12-09-2005, 11:39 PM	#51
Fucksakes Shit... Fuck! What the Hell? Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 7,567	50 sig spot #2, can you see it?

12-10-2005, 12:40 AM	#53
stev0 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Calgary, Alberta Posts: 6,801	So... i've always wondered, does Rick Saloman or RedLight have a signed model release from Paris? If not, then they don't really have any rights to distribute this video either and would be breaking both the old and new USC 2257 by doing so. Just a little curiosity brain fart.