2257 Stipulated Agreement Extended Again - GoFuckYourself.com

xxxjay · 12-02-2005, 02:53 PM

2257 STIPULATED AGREEMENT EXTENDED AGAIN
DENVER, CO -- The stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales has been extended for a month. The extension will terminate December 30, or whenever U.S. District Court Judge Walker D. Miller rules on plaintiffs? motion for preliminary injunction. Under the agreement, the Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition as of June 23, 2005.
From an FSC press release, 11/30/05
www.freespeechcoalition.com

Harmon · 12-02-2005, 02:54 PM

Just having a seat right about here

JFK · 12-02-2005, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

Just having a seat right about here

got room for me??

darnit · 12-02-2005, 03:05 PM

Delay = good news or bad news?

Discuss.

seeric · 12-02-2005, 03:08 PM

this shit is getting boring to me at this point. i'm tired of talking about it.

thanks for the news though jay. thumbs up.

tranza · 12-02-2005, 03:25 PM

Who is still concerned?

sherie · 12-02-2005, 03:47 PM

^^ I would hope more people than not!!

After Shock Media · 12-02-2005, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darnit

Delay = good news or bad news?

Discuss.

Delays in court cases are generally always bad. Delays give the opponent ample amounts of time to put together even a stronger case, assemble and prep hired gun expert testimony or studies, etc.

12-02-2005, 02:53 PM	#1
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	2257 Stipulated Agreement Extended Again 2257 STIPULATED AGREEMENT EXTENDED AGAIN DENVER, CO -- The stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales has been extended for a month. The extension will terminate December 30, or whenever U.S. District Court Judge Walker D. Miller rules on plaintiffs? motion for preliminary injunction. Under the agreement, the Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition as of June 23, 2005. From an FSC press release, 11/30/05 www.freespeechcoalition.com __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

12-02-2005, 02:54 PM	#2
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,010	Just having a seat right about here __________________ [email protected]

12-02-2005, 03:25 PM	#6
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Who is still concerned? __________________ I'm just a newbie.

12-02-2005, 03:47 PM	#7
sherie Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 7,020	^^ I would hope more people than not!! __________________ AIM sherierocks ICQ 127-296-286 Skype traffichor

12-02-2005, 03:05 PM	#4
darnit Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Teh Interweb Posts: 2,439	Delay = good news or bad news? Discuss.

12-02-2005, 03:08 PM	#5
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	this shit is getting boring to me at this point. i'm tired of talking about it. thanks for the news though jay. thumbs up.