yes it helps break things up so its not so overwhelming :2 cents:

I do not understand why Epoch is not offering click through stats for affiliates. They had it in the past but for some reason it is not up and
running at the moment. It is imho the most important part of this
"game" to see where sales are coming from and which sites convert.

Also I do not like the technical documentation they offer it is way to
low level tech minded someone should rewrite it in a way ordinary webmasters can understand it (as it is now or as I know it only nerds can)

Just my 2 cents.

All I can say is, that I am happy with ccbill.

I did a similar test but I run my own pay sites so it wasn't through an affiliate. To be honest, we did more joins with Paycom but had better conversions with CCBill. I have no idea why.

If you want to do it right, then promote sponsors that using cascading processing. Our program is in a rehad stage and we will be offering cascading very soon when we release our new version.

good thread needs a bump

if Im not mistaken, epoch is working on a new system right now, with all the features ccbill has...at least I hope they will have it all

where have you been so long?

You have to explain this to me. If you send 20k hits to a paycom tour and 20k hits to a ccbill tour, how can be one tour better converting and still make less sales?

King Adam, you have the whole 2006 to answer this lol

In my experience epoch is to restrictive.

My perfectly good german cc is declined by Epoch by country!!!! CCBill takes it. Blocking Germany means blocking one of the highest markets after the US.

Most large programs use paycom as primary. So regardless of what countries one processor accepts programs make more money using paycom.

large programs do bigger mistakes than this

maybe they prefer epoch because of pre-checked cross sales :)

yep thats one of the reasons