I'm constantly blown away with the quality of my digital camera. Digital has really come a long way over the last few years. Many of my clients swear that I'm scanning chromes - but it's all digital!
Dean*
Dean*
-
<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A> -
she looks like she's very cold.I still love everybody -
No.......but I DO believe it's spam
DynaMiteComment
-
I believe she needs a fill on her manicure and the depth of field is fucked up on that pic.
Comment
-
Depth of field is fucked up? Ya' think?Originally posted by AaronM
I believe she needs a fill on her manicure and the depth of field is fucked up on that pic.
Perhaps I should have shot it at f32 for you Aaron. That way everything from the end of my lens to infinity would be in focus - would that be enough depth of field for you?
I threw her face out of focus on purpose Aaron. It was a creative decision - it's a decision that you might not necessarily agree with - but that's why I'm me...and your not! The internet needs more creativity these days - try it sometime
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
Is that Roast Beef?Comment
-
Comment
-
What kind of camera is that?
Im thinking of getting a new digital..
Chris<br>
<a href="http://www.sexypassport.com/webmaster/webmaster.php?siteid=752359">Join the Highest Paying FREE AVS. </a><br>
<a href="http://nakedpass.com/webmaster/webmaster.php">Naked Pass New FREE Avs Also Pays $20.00 Per FREE Signup!! </a><br>
Have you checked out <a href="http://makefuckingmoney.com">Make Fucking Money!</a> Get Paid on FREE Memberships!Comment
-
Aaron.......Originally posted by AaronM
I believe she needs a fill on her manicure and the depth of field is fucked up on that pic.
after checking out some of the work on your site, I realize that your thoughts and/or critiques of my work have no merit. You are not qualified to discuss the quality of my work.
Looks like most of the content on your site was shot at F32 with an on-camera flash.....as just about everything I looked at had red-eye and NO depth of field. Maybe you haven't yet got to the chapter in your New York Institute of Photography course that discusses the creativity that can be achieved with limited depth of field and how to achieve this. Or, the cause and solution of red-eye. Both are important concerns if you are to be considered a professional shooter.
Of course, if your a snapshot photographer, none of this matters
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
looks like it's going to be an entertaining thread
we'll miss you our friend. RIPComment
-
let the pissmatches begin!Comment
-
Dude why is her face all blurry?
Nz
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nedder
Dude why is her face all blurry?
Nz
It's blurry because I dropped the film cannister on the way to the lab - kinda shook up the emulsion. Hey, her pussy is in focus - what more do you want?
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
dropped? lol
looks more like someone needs a lesson about elementary optics and focusingComment
-
Ooooooooh ...
I'm off to RABBA's for snacks ....
Save me a seat ....I give ya pretzels !!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lane
dropped? lol
looks more like someone needs a lesson about elementary optics and focusing
Yea, perhaps your the one who needs lessons. I've been shooting for 13+ years, I know how to focus. If you look at the freak'n picture, you'd see her cunt is in focus. Her head is out of focus because I chose to shoot the pic that way. It's called "limited depth of field". Maybe Aaron can bring you up to date on that technique when he get's to that chapter in his lessons.
I don't wanna brag here, but any idiot with half a brain cell can look at the images on my site and see that I'm not a "snapshot photographer" like some of the guys who post here
If this isn't obvious to you, then I'm wasting my time discussing the finer point of photography with someone who can't even see!
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
You need to relax dude.... you are killing yourself here.Originally posted by PlanetContent
I don't wanna brag here, but any idiot with half a brain cell can look at the images on my site and see that I'm not a "snapshot photographer" like some of the guys who post here
If this isn't obvious to you, then I'm wasting my time discussing the finer point of photography with someone who can't even see!
Dean*Comment
-
Originally posted by PlanetContent
Yea, perhaps your the one who needs lessons. I've been shooting for 13+ years, I know how to focus. If you look at the freak'n picture, you'd see her cunt is in focus. Her head is out of focus because I chose to shoot the pic that way. It's called "limited depth of field". Maybe Aaron can bring you up to date on that technique when he get's to that chapter in his lessons.
I don't wanna brag here, but any idiot with half a brain cell can look at the images on my site and see that I'm not a "snapshot photographer" like some of the guys who post here
If this isn't obvious to you, then I'm wasting my time discussing the finer point of photography with someone who can't even see!
Dean ... you been into the Newfie Screech tonight Bro ??
This board is called "FUCKING AROUND and general discussion" ...
Most of the guys who have responded to you are just yanking your chain .... this board is like that man ...
Dean is a friend, and a FINE photographer .... he knows his shit, so any haters can refer to the top left corner of this webpage ...
Also .... I would like to add, that Aaron too is a good friend and mighty fine photographer ... I think it is a fair assumption to say that they each cater to a slightly different clientele .... Aaron does a damn good job of finding us and shooting some of the cutest amateur girls I have seen, and I personally find his style of shooting very creative, and I applaud him for that ...
Dean has the credentials behind him, and it shows in his work ...
That is all that needs to be said here.
There are many fine photogs around us, some I know personally, and others I may know casually, some I have yet to meet ... but don't think that because I did not mention you I think you suck ... not at all ....
This thread involves two friends of mine, and I am just trying to offer my objective opinion, in hopes of diverting a potentially brutal pissing match ....
Now you two come give eachother a big hug, and lets try playing in the sandbox together NICELY !!!
Don't make me have to come and separate yous !!
Last edited by -=HUNGRYMAN=-; 03-19-2002, 12:47 AM.Comment
-
girl looks out of focus...
maybe you meant it that way, but it still looks crappyComment
-
Ponder this for a moment .... if everybody's photographs looked EXACTLY THE SAME ..... I think this job would become sooooo fucking BORING real fast !!!
If I had to sit here and look at the same photos all day long .... same lighting .... same effects .... same poses ..... same field of depth .... I'D GO FUCKING NUTZ in about 3 days tops !!
I am thankful that the world has so many different photographers, each with a slightly different approach ....
My hat goes off to you guys !!!
Comment
-
First you say this:
Originally posted by PlanetContent
It's blurry because I dropped the film cannister on the way to the lab - kinda shook up the emulsion. Hey, her pussy is in focus - what more do you want?
Dean*
And then this:
Originally posted by PlanetContent
Her head is out of focus because I chose to shoot the pic that way. It's called "limited depth of field". Maybe Aaron can bring you up to date on that technique when he get's to that chapter in his lessons.
Just be consistent with what you're saying. First you say you dropped it, then you say you chose to focus that way... Well, i am not a photographer and i am not gonna question your skillz. Its just your reply was funny and you sounded like blaming the focusing problem on something else.
Oh well, i am going to bed. I will read arons replies tomorrow i guess, hehe.Comment
-
I DONT AGREE WITH with attacking new people who come to this board to introduce themselfs and show you what they have..The same shit happened with Paul Markam and I Stuck up for him.. When you spend tens of thousands of dollars on content you have been around the block looking and you know whats out there... I have seen this guys stuff and it looks great...Comment
-
Hey Hungryman - good to see you!
Perhaps your right on with your thoughts man. I just felt attacked by Aaron for his remark about the depth of field being fucked up in that pic. I guess I just expected someone like Aaron to know the difference in a pic being fucked up and a pic purposely shot with limited depth of field. His comment was something that I would expect to hear from someone who knew nothing about photography...not by someone who has some photographic knowledge and education.
Photography is art and art is subjective. I would never tell another "fellow artist" that his "depth of field" is fucked up. Maybe he shot it that way - did it on purpose. Maybe that was his vision - that's what he wanted the pic to look like. Too bad all artists are not as respectful!
Hope things are good for ya' Hungryman!
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
where's the popcorn? where's Aaron?we'll miss you our friend. RIPComment
-
Yes Lane, the part about dropping the film on the way to the lab was a joke....sorry you didn't get it. FOR FUTURE REFERENCE: Dropping your film on the way to the lab will not make your pics out of focus!
Also....
You say to me........."Well, i am not a photographer and i am not gonna question your skillz".
But you did question my skills when you said...."looks more like someone needs a lesson about elementary optics and focusing"
And you have room to talk about ME being inconsistant with MY statements?
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
Your stuff looks great dean,keep up the good work.
Mike....Mike DComment
-
Yo Bitches ;-)
Dean is a close friend of mine, Pull your dogs out of this one, no reason to fuck with him because he posted a fine pussy on the board, you should be thanking him. The man does excellent work and has great prices! The docus of that pic is on whats inportant, Thats what focus is for.
Bring on the Tight Pussies!Comment
-
especially when it was clearly labelled as digital lolOriginally posted by PlanetContent
Yes Lane, the part about dropping the film on the way to the lab was a joke....sorry you didn't get it. FOR FUTURE REFERENCE: Dropping your film on the way to the lab will not make your pics out of focus!
Comment
-
How come no one brings up her butthole?
Just her pussy?
I thought I would ask..<br>
<a href="http://www.sexypassport.com/webmaster/webmaster.php?siteid=752359">Join the Highest Paying FREE AVS. </a><br>
<a href="http://nakedpass.com/webmaster/webmaster.php">Naked Pass New FREE Avs Also Pays $20.00 Per FREE Signup!! </a><br>
Have you checked out <a href="http://makefuckingmoney.com">Make Fucking Money!</a> Get Paid on FREE Memberships!Comment
-
" I realize that your thoughts and/or critiques of my work have no merit. You are not qualified to discuss the quality of my work. "
... I am still waiting on arron´s reply on this one ...Comment
-
It is a nice butthole now that you have pointed that out.
I like the pic.
Comment
-
Buttholes are underrated..
I think I will start a butthole site.. nothing but buttholes..
nothingbutbuttholes.com
coming soon!!<br>
<a href="http://www.sexypassport.com/webmaster/webmaster.php?siteid=752359">Join the Highest Paying FREE AVS. </a><br>
<a href="http://nakedpass.com/webmaster/webmaster.php">Naked Pass New FREE Avs Also Pays $20.00 Per FREE Signup!! </a><br>
Have you checked out <a href="http://makefuckingmoney.com">Make Fucking Money!</a> Get Paid on FREE Memberships!Comment
-
with wich digital camera did you make the pic ?Main sites: Duclerck.com & Diderote.com My Hosting: AmeriNOC
My Sponsors: NewNudeCash, Silvercash, Sapphic Cash, BCash4you
Email: webmaster @ duclerck.comComment
-
I didn't need to look at the face, once I saw her box, I instanlty recognized herComment
-
I vote for Hungryman to be
chief moderator and president of the Board.........
I can feel the love already...............
<a href="http://www.bimbolinks.com"><img src="http://www.12circle.com/banners/bimbo_120x60.jpg"border="0"></a><BR>Comment
-
Planet Content.....I personally like the depth of field twist....I assume the decision was based on the idea of creating a different focus for this shot...first thing I thought when I saw the pic was "Nice!!!!"
To many people on this board do nothing but shoot mediocre girls in a consistent and boring fashion....most of the images look flat and blah, blah, blah boring...
Nice Job.... I will get our content guy for Orgasm.com to check out your stuff!! and enquire about pricingInsane, Color and Instant Sensation
REalize the potential of dynamic coded features
all in real time Vivid Php Code
This is the reality of Outsoursouring
SKype HolyBauhaus
Deep, Deep in the Tropical Dry Rainforest.Comment
-
LMAOOriginally posted by PlanetContent
Depth of field is fucked up? Ya' think?
Perhaps I should have shot it at f32 for you Aaron. That way everything from the end of my lens to infinity would be in focus - would that be enough depth of field for you?
I threw her face out of focus on purpose Aaron. It was a creative decision - it's a decision that you might not necessarily agree with - but that's why I'm me...and your not! The internet needs more creativity these days - try it sometime
Dean*
No need to be a cock dude. I did not insult you but you see fit to insult me? Personally, I like your work and have happily backed you when people asked me about other content providers. Not sure that I will continue this practice if you are gonna show me attitude when I joke with you. GFY baby!
Divine Content has similar stuff and Mike does not have a bug up his ass.
Also, in case you did not notice... I did not post my sig to your thread on my last reply. This was done out of professional courtesy. You might give it a try sometime.Last edited by AaronM; 03-19-2002, 09:55 AM.Comment
-
This gets better as I read the rest of the replies. I do not give a fuck if you approve of my work or not. My customers like it. I shoot AMATEURS in an AMATEUR style. People who are looking for my content will not be going to your site to find what they need. Open your eyes pal, there is a whole world out there.Originally posted by PlanetContent
Aaron.......
after checking out some of the work on your site, I realize that your thoughts and/or critiques of my work have no merit. You are not qualified to discuss the quality of my work.
Looks like most of the content on your site was shot at F32 with an on-camera flash.....as just about everything I looked at had red-eye and NO depth of field. Maybe you haven't yet got to the chapter in your New York Institute of Photography course that discusses the creativity that can be achieved with limited depth of field and how to achieve this. Or, the cause and solution of red-eye. Both are important concerns if you are to be considered a professional shooter.
Of course, if your a snapshot photographer, none of this matters
Dean*Comment
-
AMEN Brotha!Originally posted by -=HUNGRYMAN=-
....... I think it is a fair assumption to say that they each cater to a slightly different clientele .... Aaron does a damn good job of finding us and shooting some of the cutest amateur girls I have seen, and I personally find his style of shooting very creative, and I applaud him for that ...
Dean has the credentials behind him, and it shows in his work ...
That is all that needs to be said here.
See...THAT is what I am talking about.Comment
-
....And...MAYBE Aaron was FUCKING AROUND. Notice theOriginally posted by PlanetContent
Photography is art and art is subjective. I would never tell another "fellow artist" that his "depth of field" is fucked up. Maybe he shot it that way - did it on purpose. Maybe that was his vision - that's what he wanted the pic to look like. Too bad all artists are not as respectful!
Hope things are good for ya' Hungryman!
Dean* in my initial post?
As far as my photography education.... I majored in PhotoJournalsim...It would have been just photgraphy but that was not an option at the school I attended. I throw most of the stuff I learned out the window to shoot amateur.
As I continue to read this thread....You seem to be pulling your head out of your ass thanks to Hungryman so perhaps by the end I will not feel so insulted.Last edited by AaronM; 03-19-2002, 09:22 AM.Comment
-
BTW... I laughed my ass off about the dropping of the film canister thing. Kinda reminded me of when I worked at a local photography store and these dumb fuckers would bring their film in for developing and as they handed us the film they would ask if the pics came out ok. God forbid they droped the film or we would tell them that they might have just knocked the pictures out of the frame. The fuckers actually believed it.
Then there were the ones who would insist that you should be able to tell right away if their pics came out....These assholes really pissed me off because they were so demanding. We always kept test film under the counter to show people how the cameras loaded and so forth so when these pricks started in we would switch their film with a test roll and pull the entire strip out, hold it up to the light, and tell them that it was all WAY over exposed.
AH, those were the days.
Last edited by AaronM; 03-19-2002, 09:22 AM.Comment
-
I just got a Nikon Coolpix 995 on Ebay and it rocks.Comment
-
Dean,
Don't listen to these knuckleheads. They're just pulling your chain. When you defend yourself, it just charges the board up, and everyone goes on the attack.
I live in the valley, and will be moving to N.Hollywood in few days. ICQ me sometime, or have your people call my people, maybe we could hook up. Hollywod is where I spent my most impressionable years.
Ever go to Mondo Video? I practically grew up inside there. I once watched Bridgette the Midget get fucked in there. (Just before her first porno). The guy picked her up, and walked her all over the store while fucking here. LOL It was hilarious.
SPECIALTY COSTUMES • PROPS • FX
Superheroes • Monsters • Robots
PM for details
For any manufacturing needs. Adult or otherwise.
aka BonsHigh on Insta
Bonsai weed plants
Comment
-
Aaron said...."You and I both know damn good and well that you did not do that on purpose."
How can you say that Aaron? Do you know what I was previsualizing when I made that photograph? I use limited depth of field all the time Aaron. It's a great effect when you want to control what the viewer is looking at. By keeping an area in focus and throwing other areas of the pic out of focus, you control where the viewers eye goes first. This is elementary stuff if you've studied photography for any length of time.
Here's a few more examples of my use of "limited depth of field".
Aaron, do you think I shot those 2 pics that way on purpose? Or do you think I'm the kind of photographer who just takes whatever comes out of the camera? Yes, I shot those pics like that on purpose - just as I shoot everything I shoot "on purpose"!
You said..."I throw most of the stuff I learned out the window to shoot amateur."
That's fine man - but don't expect everyone to shoot by your rules. I shoot amateurs too - I just choose to do a better job then most. I want my girls to be amateur - not my photography!
Dean*<br>
<A HREF="http://www.planetcontent.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.planetcontent.com/content/planetcbutton.gif"></A>Comment
-
Dean, enough already
Now Go Fuck Yourself!CelebPay: Promote Celebrity Reviews
i/c/q - :1851935Comment
-
they still look out of focus...
By the way, what camera did you use?Comment
-
my cat has less fur than that.Originally posted by PlanetContent
the revolution is coming.Comment
-
Umm.. that's what a pussy looks like.Originally posted by Dawgy
my cat has less fur than that.
It's not too furry. Atleast there's no ugly stubble.
That kinda pussy looks more 'teen' than a shaved one, why?
Teens don't shave until they meet a boyfriend who tells them to.
..and I'm off.Comment
-
S P A M but in a creative way....
Comment
-
Comment