Sex worker for 6 years and hold degree that includes a major in neuroscience.

For the fact there is controversy about this points to something that doesn't necessarily "add up." We don't witness the same debates concerning MMR.

You do in the UK about MMR. That has been one of the biggest health issues here for the past five years or so after large groups of parents heard rumours that it wasn't safe and stopped getting their kids vacinated despite the cries of the vast majority of the medical profession.

I am sure there is pleanty we don't know about HIV/AIDS, etc but I think the way theories such as this are discussed in public have to be done carefully because a lot of people just listen for any reason not to protect themselves.

i'll upload it to an ftp for everyone

Isn't it surprising that till now the most known drug against HIV, that so unique and fatal virus is AZT which in reality was developed for cancer treatment and was failing to get approval from FDA till the AIDS panicked the western world. It's been almost 15 years since then and no real progress.

Centurion, wnt more? The french HIV founder,Luc Montagnier, now states:

HIV cannot cause AIDS on its own, but needed a cofactor which he believes is a mycoplasma.

bump :)

///

Yes but in the UK the problem is with the vaccine. People are debating if it is safe or not. They are not debating if the viruses of MMR are real or not or if the research was done properly or not.

The problem with HIV is once you dig below the surface of the hype. You find that there are equal numbers of researchers, doctors, etc on both sides of the fence.

All appear to be equally qualified and in most cases the positions depend on "who" is paying them. Indpendants appear to attck the validity of the HIV virus. Whereas, those employed by drug companies and goverment support it.

And there is the problem...

Obviously if after more than 25 years of research this controversy continues.... Something isn't "right."

The disease does appears to be very "selective" and "regional" about what groups of society it attacks.

eg:
In impoverished parts of Africa aproximately 33% of the HIV cases are children of less than 8 years old. And in more than haf of those cases, the parents are NOT testing positive for the virus.

This begs the question of how are they getting it?
----

I'm a sex worker, my body and its health are my biggest concerns. I know there are a bunch of stupid twats that just screw and don't give a second thought about what happens.

But as far as I am concern, I want to know EVERY damn thing and piece of information available. And I am not going to isolate myself to just believing one side of the story.

-

I know some guys who are positive for years. They are not taking any meds either as doctors don't see fit for it at their stage. HIV+ does not mean people do develop AIDS right away.

The medications are the real killer :2 cents:

I met both Dr. Deusberg, professor and expert in retroviruses at UC Berkeley, and Dr. Mullis, who won a Nobel for his work, and had dinner with them years ago.

Eye opening for sure and couldn't get more firsthand information.

They must have never heard of this guy :

http://www.howard.edu/newsroom/image...n%20Player.jpg


:pimp

Yawn.............

Exactly and that's why so many women there feel they need to screw as a matter of health priority.

Yeah, there are lot of conspiracy theories about the HIV... I'm happy for the guy... :thumbsup

You can get rid of HIV by simply crossing a border to a country where the scoring is different, just don't cross back or you'll have it again. :2 cents: