Today was the day.
-
-
I wondered that earlier. Hopefully someone in the know will be able to update us soon.~
Doer of Things at
MetArtMoney
Where Flawless Beauty Meets Art
~The MetArt Network ~
selena.delgado9 -
As soon as I hear something, I'll post to GFY.Comment
-
Negrodamus says another delay
Comment
-
Call me crazy but I wil bet nothing will happen with 2257 any time soon.Comment
-
I'll have to agree with you crazyOriginally posted by DirtyWhiteBoyComment
-
Wondering that too. Judge Miller said that the ruling on the injuction would be "sooner rather than later" but that was months ago.Comment
-
On October 7th a motion was granted for an extension to November 21st 2005Comment
-
-
Sites are already getting raided. A Washington State BDSM site was shut down last week. I asked the webmaster to post here to tell us about it, but I guess she hasn't yet.email: [email protected]Comment
-
They are supposed to rule on an injuction that was filed by the Free Speech CoalitionComment
-
I dont believe that had anything to do with 2257Originally posted by ElliComment
-
Where did you get this info?Originally posted by Toolz
And please do not say a FSC newsletter or I will rip my hair out cause I am a member and have never recieved a single one.Comment
-
Was she a member of the FSC?Originally posted by ElliComment
-
Also I believe (at least the way it was reported) the sites that were shutdown were voluntary by their WM's - out of fearComment
-
Sherm - it wasnt 2257 related - it was some WMs that got scared that the obscenity task force was going after BDSM sites and they voluntarily shut down themselves - at least according to their media releaseComment
-
If you are a member of FSC and not receiving the weekly emailed newsletter, The Xpress, please email Neva at the FSC offices.
[email protected]Comment
-
Hmmm I get a newsletter each week.Originally posted by After Shock Media
Each newsletter I get has this at the bottom
Subscriptions to Free Speech X-Press are FREE to FSC members. Contact us at [email protected] or 800-476-7813Comment
-
my dj website was raided becasue i caught these two hotties in the bathroom backstage together and they couldn't prove that they didn't mack each others fun place.
i may go to jail for failure to prove sex happened.
Comment
-
No, she had no idea what 2257 was all about or what has been going on. She's more a bdsm'er who just happens to have a site than a webmaster.Originally posted by shermsshackemail: [email protected]Comment
-
Nice to see the us goverment are still screwing up
Comment
-
bump for any newsComment
-
bumpidy bump!NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose
Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!Comment
-
Bump????NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose
Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!Comment
-
Originally posted by Tat2Jr
Whitehat is for chumps
If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!Comment
-
-
2257 Agreement Extended Again - For One Month
Got this in from FSC.
Denver, Co. ? A motion was filed in the U.S. District Court of Colorado this afternoon that extends for one month the original stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales.
The extension will terminate November 30, 2005, or until the Court rules on Plaintiffs? motion for preliminary injunction, whichever occurs first. During that time period, the Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition.
Terms of the original stipulation are once more maintained intact, and it is still the expectation of the attorneys for the Free Speech Coalition that a decision by U.S District Court Judge Walker D. Miller on the Plaintiff?s motion for a preliminary injunction will be rendered soon.
?We understand that the adult entertainment community is as eager as we are to have a ruling on our motion for a preliminary injunction,? said FSC Executive Director Michelle L. Freridge, ?but sometimes the wheels of justice revolve very slowly, and we simply must be patient. But make no mistake, we are as confident as ever that our arguments challenging these abusive regulations will win out at the end of the day. We appreciate your patience, and look forward to ultimate victory in this significant battle to protect your free speech rights.?Comment
-
thanks redrobComment
-
I heard a rumor on another board that the DOJ seemed to be giving in on some of the 2257 stuff that they had written in (like what is considered explicit). Is there any truth to that?
Comment
-
I haven't heard anything to that effect. I'm sure the attorneys for both sides would keep an agreement like that under wraps until all the details were finalized. Only afterwards, would they make a formal announcement.Comment
-
The government probably wants to keep delaying the case until they get another right winger on the Supreme Court so they can be assured of a win on appeal.
Comment
-
I suspect you are exactly right.Originally posted by Mr.FictionThe government probably wants to keep delaying the case until they get another right winger on the Supreme Court so they can be assured of a win on appeal.Comment
-
i'm also interested...
so a little bump for you... ;)---
Busy ranking websites on Google...
Comment
-
I'm so fucking paranoid about this shit that i'm not doing any image or movie content until it is resolved. I know its an overreaction, but i'm not taking any chances.
icq:159548293Comment
-
Told ya they'd extend it again ;) Feds move S L O WMike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.Comment
-
Just read this on Yahoo
2257 hits mainstream entertainment
But guess what, Pence is willing to bend for them, not us
I also did not know that this is eventually going to the Senate. Is it?Comment
-
another 30 day stay!Stephen Bugbee
www.x2k.com
ICQ# FUCK ICQ
bugbee AT x2k dot com
X2K consulting and media services - specializing in business development, technology and profitability of your new or existing products and services
X2K MEDIA SUITE
Need a high risk merchant account? Contact me..
Are you a donor? Have a heart and help someone in need. Go to the DMV and be sure you are a donor, it saves lives!!!!Comment
-
"Including the legitimate industry in the reporting requirement risks having the entire statute fail because it would expand the reach of the law beyond child protection."Originally posted by MrPinks
I'm a little offended by this word.Comment
-
I overlooked that. That is pretty fucked up.Originally posted by ModelPerfect
Comment
-
We are members and have not recieved anything at all execpt thank you for joining. This was a couple of months ago.Originally posted by RedrobAmateur ContentICQ: 292 356 077Comment
-
Hey Redrob, when all is said and done with 2257...what is going to be done with the membership list that is the hands of some court appointed clerk.
Will it be turned over to the government so they can start with the names on the list?
I am just curious as to how this will be handled and just how secure the list will be once the new regulations are in place.
No one has been able to answer this as of yetLast edited by Nikki_Licks; 11-01-2005, 09:49 AM.Amateur ContentICQ: 292 356 077Comment
-
I have inquired on your behalf and post a reply when I receive it concerning the "List".Comment
-
Nikki,Originally posted by Nikki_Licks
It is not a clerk, but a retired judge, who is keeping the master list under the terms of the stipulated agreement with the Feds. When that agreement is up, the list will be returned to us, but it will never be handed over to the government. Now, the actual ruling by the court on the motion for a preliminary injunction, which we are waiting for right now, will determine the reach of 2257, and what the government can do with respect to it while both sides prepare for the full trial. But please be assured that the list of FSC members will never be given to anyone for any reason other than one similar to this situation, where the full force of the law guarantees its secrecy.
Tom
Comment
-
Tom,
Thank youComment
-
So far so good, I guess. It's good that they're not dismissing it out of hand.email: [email protected]Comment
-
Thanks for clarifying a few things for me. Its great to see the FSC is on top of things and looking out for rights.Originally posted by HymesAmateur ContentICQ: 292 356 077Comment
-
Redrob, thanks for getting Tom to answer my question. It puts me at ease knowing we wont just be put on the chopping block by the government because we are part of an organization that stands up for the rights and freedoms of the people.Originally posted by RedrobAmateur ContentICQ: 292 356 077Comment
)
Comment