Is public nudity and spring break content Exempt from 2257? - GoFuckYourself.com

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 10:56 AM

Does anyone know the answer to this?

8 Characters · 10-25-2005, 10:58 AM

I would guess it's not, Roger.

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8 Characters

I would guess it's not, Roger.

whats going to happen to all the programs and sites then?

Just wondering

Dirty Dane · 10-25-2005, 11:04 AM

mere nudity is exempt

EroticySteve · 10-25-2005, 11:04 AM

GGW must be getting docs on their staged stuff. I'd hope they are.

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

mere nudity is exempt

what if they touch there breast

OldSchoolJim · 10-25-2005, 11:06 AM

We are already working on solutions to this question!

KMR Stitch · 10-25-2005, 11:06 AM

GFY is full of Certified Opinioned lawyers

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EpicJim

We are already working on solutions to this question!

I'm talking about the new 2257 regs on it?

Seems a little risky if you don't have the right docs and most of that content doesn't at least in the past it didn't

After Shock Media · 10-25-2005, 11:11 AM

Ok assuming they replaced exemption (e) from 2256 back into 2257 *revised, which has been said that they indeed did. Then just nudity and such is indeed 2257 exempt, like it was prior to the 2257 revisions.

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Ok assuming they replaced exemption (e) from 2256 back into 2257 *revised, which has been said that they indeed did. Then just nudity and such is indeed 2257 exempt, like it was prior to the 2257 revisions.

your telling me you don't need to have ID? I doubt it

Dirty Dane · 10-25-2005, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerV

what if they touch there breast

It depends. If the nipples are hard - and you can't prove it was cold that day - then you're in big trouble. ...if they have no breasts to touch at all - don't post it.

Matt 26z · 10-25-2005, 11:23 AM

2257 is for sexually explicit material. So it depends on what is going on in the public nudity content. Non-sexual nudity alone does not fall under 2257 (i.e. girls flashing). On the other hand if you've got two topless girls dancing and feeling each other up, that may be a different story.

Babagirls · 10-25-2005, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMR Stitch

GFY is full of Certified Opinioned lawyers

and doctors

8 Characters · 10-25-2005, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babagirls

and doctors

and bodybuilding champions.

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

2257 is for sexually explicit material. So it depends on what is going on in the public nudity content. Non-sexual nudity alone does not fall under 2257 (i.e. girls flashing). On the other hand if you've got two topless girls dancing and feeling each other up, that may be a different story.

I was thinking about launching a public nudity site but seems a little to risky.

unless I hire all the girls and have the docs

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babagirls

and doctors

LOL

What about Pimps

After Shock Media · 10-25-2005, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerV

your telling me you don't need to have ID? I doubt it

I am just telling you what the law says. Though I am sure you have a lawyer for this, I know I do.

Though I will stand by the fact that plain old nudity, flashing, and the like does not need an ID to be legal, since 2257 would not apply to it.

RogerV · 10-25-2005, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

I am just telling you what the law says. Though I am sure you have a lawyer for this, I know I do.

Though I will stand by the fact that plain old nudity, flashing, and the like does not need an ID to be legal, since 2257 would not apply to it.

I was just curious it's an area I don't want to mess with if in the states

10-25-2005, 10:56 AM	#1
RogerV Banned! Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 12,591	Is public nudity and spring break content Exempt from 2257? Does anyone know the answer to this?

10-25-2005, 11:04 AM	#5
EroticySteve Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: The Sunshine State Posts: 4,365	GGW must be getting docs on their staged stuff. I'd hope they are. __________________ You deserve to make more money. I'll help you do that. Our affiliates earn up to $3/email or $107/sale email steve <at> eroticy.com - icq 290153464

10-25-2005, 11:11 AM	#10
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Ok assuming they replaced exemption (e) from 2256 back into 2257 *revised, which has been said that they indeed did. Then just nudity and such is indeed 2257 exempt, like it was prior to the 2257 revisions. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

10-25-2005, 10:58 AM	#2
8 Characters So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: This month's character: Dirty Franck Posts: 2,336	I would guess it's not, Roger.

10-25-2005, 11:04 AM	#4
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	mere nudity is exempt

10-25-2005, 11:06 AM	#7
OldSchoolJim Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 3,117	We are already working on solutions to this question!

10-25-2005, 11:06 AM	#8
KMR Stitch I am cool Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 14,494	GFY is full of Certified Opinioned lawyers

10-25-2005, 11:23 AM	#13
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	2257 is for sexually explicit material. So it depends on what is going on in the public nudity content. Non-sexual nudity alone does not fall under 2257 (i.e. girls flashing). On the other hand if you've got two topless girls dancing and feeling each other up, that may be a different story.