So what have we learned from all this? Does Labret really have the chronic? Is Gary still sleeping on my couch? Is Forest really as dense as a tree or does his reading comprehension level equal that of a 6 year old? Is he a spammer? Damn, I guess I'll have to check that other thread.

Forest isn't a spammer...that's an insult to spammers!

Spammers are usually good enough to only mail you once or twice a day to whatever address they harvested from wherever.....they don't typically email you at every single domain you own... :throwup

But he doesn't work there.. :moon :fart

I just reported that site to ASACP. I think the images go beyond "iffy"

This is from http://www.lolitasex.com meta tags. Fantasyman already posted this in another thread, but still CCBill processes for it. Lolitasex does not have underage models, however they are preying on pedophiles and illegal content promises to make their money. CCBill processes for them... and why? This site sure looks illegal in it's meta tags promoting child porn. "13,14,15" "lolita girls age 14-17"> What in Gods name is that doing on their site? That is illegal in my books, but that is just my opinion. I am disgusted that CCBill processes for these people and I would never use them as my credit card processor. Dirty scum bags. They have known about this site for a long time and they still do nothing about it. What gives?

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>
<META
content="lolita, lolita sex, lolita bbs, young lolita, russian lolitas, little lolitas, lolita porn, preteen lolita, nude lolitas, lolita art, lolita girl, naturist, teen, underage, naked, illegal, mpeg, video"
name=Keywords>
<META
content="An Lolita Gallery of young nude russian lolita girls Age 14 to 17"
name=Description>
<META
content="lolita, lolitas, nude teenage girls, naked teenage girls, naked teens, naked young girls, teen nudism, teenage nudism, young teens, underage, under age, under-age, underage models, under age models, under-age models, underage girls, under age girls, under-age girls, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 year old, junior high, little girls, under 18, amateur teens, amateur girls, amateur teenage girls, amateurs, amateur models, cheerleaders, highschool cheerleaders, schoolgirls, nude, nudity, innocentangels, nudes, nude pictures, adolescent, pubescent, photography, david hamilton, jock sturgis, panties, panty, youth, borders, barnes &amp; noble, art photography"
name=Classification></HEAD>


You be the judge. Yuk.

I learned that beastiality is NOT the only thing CCbill is involved with.

Good find, Fantasy Man!

Hmm
From there partner program
Meta tags
content="An Lolita Gallery of young nude russian lolita girls Age 14 to 17"


I think I see now why visa want to take this matter into their own hands.

These guys are the huns biggest advertiser, been there ever since I remember.

Meta tags will be in court soon i guess. If visa mention them then the fbi are more than interested.

As if the rest of the site wasn't bad enough, those metas are absolutely fucking disgusting. :2 cents:

eww.

Those are references to child porn alright. I think they contradicted themselves there.

I think all the billing proccessors should just agree, "let's not proccess for these sites, or imitation sites"

i dont get it
it is not that much money...it is probably alot, but i mean, not the whole boat ;)

Maybe someone should mail Barnes and Noble, they appearin the meta tags. I am sure they have very expensive lawyers with not much to do.

Well, will somebody from CCBill say something here? Those meta tags you have known about for a long time. I wish I had the link to the fantasyman thread where he posted this a few weeks ago. So they can't plead ignorance.

forest, you're one tired mother fucker.

Daymare - no problem try

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...pagenu mber=2

My post about this was 2/11/02 it's been 17 days - no change to the site and there probably won't be.

I had told KK about this on other boards over two months ago also.

Now watch, I'll be a psychic -

Brad Shaw will soon be here blasting me and then KK will appear and do the same, but they'll never address the actuak issue. let's see if I'm right :)

This is hurting our industry more than you know......

You'd think that after that big commotion a couple of weeks ago, CCBill would have done something about that site with the underage meta tags.

Very interesting. :-\

Look's like CCBILL is under fire.

the board lately is getting better all the time :thumbsup

and I heard that you even called CCbill about it...

Good job, Ron,
if only those who have ears have listened!

WE KNOW,
because industry foes get undisputable upper hand with this one and than extrapolate this shit on the entire Industry

The only thing KK has to say about it is to BASH me for starting the thread

Sorry Sweetie

:(

Fantasy Man

U R 100% correct

and the WORST thing is that They CAN do something about it BUT the WONT

Forest,
leave KK alone,
it ain't CCbill's fault that child porn was found on the computer of the suspect in California girl murder.

Its Not???

Then who's fault is it

NOT MINE
BUT I bet that the officals LOOK at our indusatry as a WHOLE tp be resopnsible for that

BUT I bet that the officals LOOK at our indusatry as a WHOLE tp be resopnsible for that
********************************

don't tell me you came to this conclusion on your own and haven't read Webfather on Oprano....

Serge I dont read your board enough anymore

But Webfather is a Veryy smart guy though

it's OK, Forest,
I love pisture you posted there yesterday anyway
:)

Serge

That was a present for UUUU

I still love you u big LUG

:winkwink:

Leave it to you guys, to take a serious thread about a serious issue and make it all about *You*.

< soapbox mode on >
I'm sorry I hate cp as much as anyone else but this is the stupidest thing I have ever seen written.

Do you not realize once they erode your civil liberties in one area they erode them in all.

If cops were allowed to circumvent search warrants in cases of cp they'd just start using that as an excuse to go in and harass honest adult webmasters or whoever it is they had a bone to pick with.

Please pick up a newspaper, watch some documentaries read books on history that were not provided by your school about such things as the anti-war movement, the civil rights movement, the McCarthy hearings and you will see why we have certain civil liberties like the miranda warning in place due to the abuse of government in the past which continues in the present (they are considering revoking the miranda warning) ....and maybe you might rethink this statement.

Rushing in and arresting someone on pure speculation and no investigation or evidence will only result in cases being turned over by higher courts which will release the true criminals while more than likely locking up honest people in the process.

Just imagine pissing off some asshole adult webmasters who gets a hardon fucking with people...he picks up the phone and calls Officer Winchell and makes a false accusation against you...the headlines in the newspaper across the front page.
"Local adult webmaster arrested for running child porn websites!"

And then 6 weeks later the retraction is printed somewhere on page 15 in small print. "Charges were dropped due to lack of evidence."

But guess what you were arrested...and you now have a record...convicted for a crime...no...but arrested...yes...and just as bad in the eyes of your local community...enjoy the rest of your fucked up life.

< /soapbox mode off >

eroswebmaster,
very keen observations, indeed

She inferred it.

She said 2 different things that might lead you to that conclusion.

1. Just because someone slaps up a CCBILL Join page doesn't mean the join page works. Credit Card thiefs and Password stealers do this all the time.

2. Try to join it. It won't work.

Did you contact CoreHosting about it yet ?
FreedomHosting.com ( ICQ# 38586806 ) ?

Brujah
OK, make a fool of me
***********************

I don't think you are even worthy of THAT,
too small
;-(((

HOLY CHIT bat-MANUEL

Serge and I agree on something

:thumbsup

Damn forest you really make me PUKE.
You work for one of the biggest spammers on the net
There is one topic going about the bitches from interclimax and you quickly start this topic to to grab the attention away from the topic about your spam.

If a site has real CP i'm sure that they will delete their account and report their site.
Do you really think they would risk their business for a few extra bucks made with a sick site containing CP?
And yes maybe it is better to just not allow any sites that try to make it look like CP.

But you are just tasteless.
Just mail them and don't try to start this kinda thread when there is a thread going about your spamming.

And the keywords are not cool either but one of the biggest tgp's has keywords like incest, rape, pre-teen in it... is sick and for sure not a way I would try to get my surfers but it is not illegal.

LOL

1 has NOTHING to do with the OTHER

This topic STARTED on Netpond 2 days ago

BEFORE the thread about the spam

SR

Get your facts straight please before Openning your mouth and Inserting FOOT

:1orglaugh

Good to see FM is here to save our industry! Who is next to show up? Seth? Crecent?

Brad, don't get jelous and carried away,
Ron made MORE for the industry and it's development than you EVER will.

Serge - the day after these posts and FM Radio discussion I personally called Ron Cadwell - he didn't return my call - seems consistent with their attitude :)

Well, Brad showed up - now where's KK :)

...and the problem is,
thru out the business history,
"Everything for a buck" attitude ALWAYS results the same-
"the house of cards" falls and leaves big crater in the process.

I hope those who get processed by questionable ethics companies will see their income disapear OVER NITE
BEFORE it happens, but...I doubt it,
cuz most people use their mouth where just ears would suffice!