Here's a tip, if you got a complaint about a site, email ccbill. They will check it out, if its ILLEGAL they will cancel the account. I dont think they care about anyone's "moral" stance. I havent looked at that site, but theres a difference between legal and illegal.
Do you think CCBILL will jepordize their business for a few extra K processing for a kiddy porn site??? Please.
She ducked this question on 2 boards yesterday
and wanted her to respond somewhere about them
Huh? Ive seen lolita sites with 40 year old crack whores on it. Lolita is a word. A very overused word. KP is a crime. What part of this dont you understand? I'll explain if i got time, but Survivor starts in 20 minutes
Originally posted by sandman! Forest: Your from interclimax/amsterdam cash right?
Why dont you pay people you fucked out of cash instead of bitching about other peoples sites?
If im right and you are from amsterdam cash go fuck yourself.
NO
I MARKET for them
1. I am NOT employed by them
2. I dont mail for them
Well, I am no expert on KK, but odds are you will get the blanket response that ANY processor would give you, and that would be to report the site to the processor. KK is no lawyer, so it is not really in her best interest to make legal judgement calls. If I get questions regarding technical issues of any program I am associated with, I direct those questions to those best suited to answer that question, the coders. If I did decide to answer, my answer (while it may be slightly informed), wont be nearly as comprehensive and precise as one of my programmers would be able to do. So I am assuming your question is best posed to the ccbill legal department.
Yes, some of the images are iffy... but is it just the fact that they use the term "lolita"? This whole damn industry is fueled by sites that insinuate underage. Its an idea as old as porn itself. It doesnt matter, they will have to comply with Visa soon anyhow on the whole "lolita" issue.
And how many sites you see out there with 2257s? 99% of newbs have no idea what that is while they are spewing out thousands of galleries and AVS sites a day. Im not saying its right, its just a fact of life. I have never heard of a website being busted for lack of it. Content producers seem to care, but joe webmaster could give a rats ass. Again, that doesnt make it right, but you only point it out to nitpick.
I am halfway thru a session of some of the ugliest weed I have ever smoked so I have no idea if any of that made any sense.
Forest,
Take your moron ass on back over to the thread that is calling you on the carpet for spamming. Or better yet, go tell your bosses to stop fucking spamming webmasters, you know how many useless times I got that email today? On domains that are NEVER used for anything???
And by the way, IF you'd get your facts in order BEFORE you try to go slinging shit just BECAUSE you see other idiots doing it, you'd have clicked on thru that join page -- something that NO ONE ever seems to do. I don't host that site so I have no control over what join page they use, or what content they have on that server. Whether or not it works is another matter, you ignorant ass.
Pretty sad when Labret makes more sense in the state he's in than you do.
Forest: If your working for those assholes you can still Go Fuck Yourself i havent been in that paysite but have know people that ran lolita paysites and they allways used 18+ content so unless you got some pics that you can say are under 18 i dont think ccbill or anyone gives a fuck what you think.
Originally posted by sandman! Forest: If your working for those assholes you can still Go Fuck Yourself i havent been in that paysite but have know people that ran lolita paysites and they allways used 18+ content so unless you got some pics that you can say are under 18 i dont think ccbill or anyone gives a fuck what you think.
OK so where is their 2257 info
I cant find it but then again acording to KK im an IDIOT
all i find is stuff like this
Authorized Sales Agent for:
Lolita-age.com
913159-0000
is CC bill
KimmyKim just told you that she canceled their account, before....cant you read between the lines?
They can stop processing for the site, but cannot erase the content on their server, you know..?
Also...I agree with sandman...you fuckers rip me off when I was dooing CJs....Ben told me that I could send all the hits I wanted to their site (exit traffic) and I would be paid...well, guess what? I have not been paid because my traffic was exit traffic....even if Ben approved my way of sending him traffic.
i wanna see a site with pics of naked adult webmasters... ones like DH, amp, boneprone, aaron (but we'd have to keep snow out of the pic cuz he cant keep his hands off other people's cocks)
there needs to be a law to allow the cops to crack down faster with out going through courts on child porn / lolita shit
and they need to take off this stupid law of "art" that the word lolita hide behinds
it should be,
site has lolita stuff or childporn, no matter where it is in the world, call up the host, gone, call up the local cops and have buddy arrested.
So what have we learned from all this? Does Labret really have the chronic? Is Gary still sleeping on my couch? Is Forest really as dense as a tree or does his reading comprehension level equal that of a 6 year old? Is he a spammer? Damn, I guess I'll have to check that other thread.
Forest isn't a spammer...that's an insult to spammers!
Spammers are usually good enough to only mail you once or twice a day to whatever address they harvested from wherever.....they don't typically email you at every single domain you own...
This is from http://www.lolitasex.com meta tags. Fantasyman already posted this in another thread, but still CCBill processes for it. Lolitasex does not have underage models, however they are preying on pedophiles and illegal content promises to make their money. CCBill processes for them... and why? This site sure looks illegal in it's meta tags promoting child porn. "13,14,15" "lolita girls age 14-17"> What in Gods name is that doing on their site? That is illegal in my books, but that is just my opinion. I am disgusted that CCBill processes for these people and I would never use them as my credit card processor. Dirty scum bags. They have known about this site for a long time and they still do nothing about it. What gives?
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0" name=GENERATOR>
<META
content="lolita, lolita sex, lolita bbs, young lolita, russian lolitas, little lolitas, lolita porn, preteen lolita, nude lolitas, lolita art, lolita girl, naturist, teen, underage, naked, illegal, mpeg, video"
name=Keywords>
<META
content="An Lolita Gallery of young nude russian lolita girls Age 14 to 17"
name=Description>
<META
content="lolita, lolitas, nude teenage girls, naked teenage girls, naked teens, naked young girls, teen nudism, teenage nudism, young teens, underage, under age, under-age, underage models, under age models, under-age models, underage girls, under age girls, under-age girls, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 year old, junior high, little girls, under 18, amateur teens, amateur girls, amateur teenage girls, amateurs, amateur models, cheerleaders, highschool cheerleaders, schoolgirls, nude, nudity, innocentangels, nudes, nude pictures, adolescent, pubescent, photography, david hamilton, jock sturgis, panties, panty, youth, borders, barnes & noble, art photography"
name=Classification></HEAD>
You may not place banners or text links on ANY page that contains actual or simulated depictions of child pornography. Additionally, you may not place our banners or link from pages which contain advertisements for child pornography.
Meta tags
content="An Lolita Gallery of young nude russian lolita girls Age 14 to 17"
I think I see now why visa want to take this matter into their own hands.
These guys are the huns biggest advertiser, been there ever since I remember.
Meta tags will be in court soon i guess. If visa mention them then the fbi are more than interested.
Comment