Funny thing about "generalities" in general, its very easy to take a stance and very easy to not be held accountable for that stance. I'd say in general, people who have tried and failed at bannerless frehosting, have had a very hastily formulated revenue model. And in general have had very little in the way of supportive resources and systems to insure success. I'm all about specifics and I'm all about success...its the details, the pennies that make or break business models. Taking a step back to gain a wider view should not necessitate the neglect of the details.


Do you truly believe that there is ANYTHING that is NOT possible? We don't and that philosophy fills our world with challenges and opportunities. The test of time will render us a success or a failure in this current challenge. And at that point a banerless freehost will either become possible or not possible for us...plain and simple, but it will never be impossible.


We've entered our pooch into the race after this elusive rabbit, bet against us or with us...it makes no difference to me, but don't make GENERAL assumptions about our track record without having specific knowledge first.

you gotta make your money right?

sorry but this is a risk that i and most webmasters do not wanna take the chance,,,

what could you do with my hard earned traffic? anything you want,,the ball is in your court

since i ain't a gambling man i don't wanna take the risk,,,
but hey thats me
:winkwink:

i never said that your hosting screws webmasters,,,
but if the shoe fits then wear it

http://www.web1000.com/compare.htm

Say hosting ads ?

Andre

I consider this the end of our debate.

since we are on the topic of Freehosts
you can quote me on this one

90% of the Freehosting service only attracts cheaters and newbies

think bout all the illegal/stolen content thats there now,,,
and ppl just waiting to redirect all that traffic,,just to make that quick buck and leave

*sigh*

it's true web1000.com has been around for a long time. in 1999 i had an account with them to host some regular websites. Don''t know how it'll turn out for them in the adult industry though.......

We've been both adult and mainstream since almost the beginning...

Which Freehost software are you guys using there?

Looks like this is how he makes his money:

http://bbs.adultwebmasterinfo.com/ub...c;f=1;t=013660

With this shit: "...from time to time requests other than those in U.S. English will generate 404 errors and possible page redirection." :disgust

I don't think so
:2 cents:

peace

that was prolly the best thing your company has ever done,,,betcha laughing all the way to the bank,,,hehe

seems to me that every $2 freehost that comes out these days is using cogent. They pay 3k a month for 100 mbit. Do you really want to host your galleries on a host that pays $30 an mbit? Not to mention cogent being extremely slow over the past few weeks. Anyone experiencing the same speed problems? I've been using www.fastestpipe.com and they have been phenomneal. A little screwed up with speed at first but over the past 2 weeks everything seems to be stable.

Not all..

I think we are the only freehost to directly host off of Qwest's backbone.