Please rate these 2 sites.. Looking for good and bad critsism. - GoFuckYourself.com

amacontent · 09-17-2005, 10:20 AM

www.slutswhoswallow.com May possibly sell as a turnkey site. Complete with content , pics and vids, and 2257

www.nauticathornxxx.com

Any suggestions will be welcome as Im gonna start pumping out a few sites from my content stores featuring exclusive and non exclusive content.

fuelcell · 09-17-2005, 10:23 AM

Nautica's site looks great, Joe. But it looks even better in IE. The front page flash is broken for me - there's a big white square and the flash "banner" is offset from that. Looks great, tho.

fuelcell · 09-17-2005, 10:25 AM

The swallow site is not so good. Too clean and no cum.

amacontent · 09-17-2005, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuelcell

The swallow site is not so good. Too clean and no cum.

So i should add some cumshot pics in there.. like with the girls mouth open and cum inside it before she swallows

fuelcell · 09-17-2005, 12:06 PM

at the very least . . . cum sites thrive on cum : )

tranza · 09-17-2005, 12:38 PM

i prefer the second one, nice colors

je_rome · 09-18-2005, 09:13 PM

I like the second one more.

Th!nk · 09-19-2005, 05:53 AM

no pics on the first site? the girl pic on the second one was not the good looking.

3piece chicken Dinner · 09-19-2005, 06:23 AM

Joe,
You asked, so I am going to tell you. Let me say that I'm not at all trying to be an ass.

My first impression of the Nautica site was that the colors are not working for me. and the choice of pics in the design was not the best. I've seen your pics of her, and you have MUCH better.

I had a similar feeling about the second site as well. The color and layout did'nt really work for me. And I don't think enough thought was put into picture selection. and to agree with another poster, the cum site needs cum.

I love Nautica as a performer and I know that site can be done MUCH better. If this is a house guy doing the designs, ( this is the part where I may sound harsh but I apoligize) perhaps he should sit out the first couple. You could get a designer that specializes in the web and you can proceed from there.

Your DVD stuff gets a solid A for quality. the boxs covers are top notch. But I'd hate to see you take a step backwards with your web stuff. They are two totally different types of media. You have the content to make these top quality, don't settle for a B level design.

With that said I wish you the best of luck and look forward to the Nautica site.

amacontent · 09-19-2005, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3piece chicken Dinner

Joe,
You asked, so I am going to tell you. Let me say that I'm not at all trying to be an ass.

My first impression of the Nautica site was that the colors are not working for me. and the choice of pics in the design was not the best. I've seen your pics of her, and you have MUCH better.

I had a similar feeling about the second site as well. The color and layout did'nt really work for me. And I don't think enough thought was put into picture selection. and to agree with another poster, the cum site needs cum.

I love Nautica as a performer and I know that site can be done MUCH better. If this is a house guy doing the designs, ( this is the part where I may sound harsh but I apoligize) perhaps he should sit out the first couple. You could get a designer that specializes in the web and you can proceed from there.

Your DVD stuff gets a solid A for quality. the boxs covers are top notch. But I'd hate to see you take a step backwards with your web stuff. They are two totally different types of media. You have the content to make these top quality, don't settle for a B level design.

With that said I wish you the best of luck and look forward to the Nautica site.

No youre not being an ass. This is a new area for me and I very much appreciate all ideas. If everyone sayss good job, then ill never know to get better

J-$ · 09-19-2005, 10:15 AM

not bad. more cum, and perhaps invest in a little originality for the designs thats bout it

PornFact · 09-19-2005, 10:30 AM

i like them both..

Elli · 09-19-2005, 11:25 AM

My two cents:

The nautica site has a more unique and interesting design. I happen to like the colours, simply because they're different from other things out there. I would add more photos to the front, though. The other site looks like a cookie cutter of most the other video based sites out there. Just being honest.

gdog · 09-19-2005, 11:35 AM

They both look nice and clean, on the Nautica site I would put the tour on this page http://www.nauticathornxxx.com/home.php the one extra step will lose the traffic in my opinion.

G

09-17-2005, 10:20 AM	#1
amacontent STANLEY CUP CHAMPION ! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 12,885	Please rate these 2 sites.. Looking for good and bad critsism. www.slutswhoswallow.com May possibly sell as a turnkey site. Complete with content , pics and vids, and 2257 www.nauticathornxxx.com Any suggestions will be welcome as Im gonna start pumping out a few sites from my content stores featuring exclusive and non exclusive content. __________________ Joe Loughlin [email protected] TEAM- joeloughlin. Telegram - AMA_JOE https://www.amaproduction.com

09-17-2005, 10:23 AM	#2
fuelcell Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 1,525	Nautica's site looks great, Joe. But it looks even better in IE. The front page flash is broken for me - there's a big white square and the flash "banner" is offset from that. Looks great, tho. __________________ Beat it. Nothing to see here.

09-17-2005, 10:25 AM	#3
fuelcell Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 1,525	The swallow site is not so good. Too clean and no cum. __________________ Beat it. Nothing to see here.

09-17-2005, 12:06 PM	#5
fuelcell Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 1,525	at the very least . . . cum sites thrive on cum : ) __________________ Beat it. Nothing to see here.

09-17-2005, 12:38 PM	#6
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	i prefer the second one, nice colors __________________ I'm just a newbie.

09-18-2005, 09:13 PM	#7
je_rome Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 6,846	I like the second one more. __________________ Make money on any traffic. Join KlikRevenue.com Today!

09-19-2005, 05:53 AM	#8
Th!nk Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 6,996	no pics on the first site? the girl pic on the second one was not the good looking.

09-19-2005, 06:23 AM	#9
3piece chicken Dinner Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: On your plate Posts: 1,065	Joe, You asked, so I am going to tell you. Let me say that I'm not at all trying to be an ass. My first impression of the Nautica site was that the colors are not working for me. and the choice of pics in the design was not the best. I've seen your pics of her, and you have MUCH better. I had a similar feeling about the second site as well. The color and layout did'nt really work for me. And I don't think enough thought was put into picture selection. and to agree with another poster, the cum site needs cum. I love Nautica as a performer and I know that site can be done MUCH better. If this is a house guy doing the designs, ( this is the part where I may sound harsh but I apoligize) perhaps he should sit out the first couple. You could get a designer that specializes in the web and you can proceed from there. Your DVD stuff gets a solid A for quality. the boxs covers are top notch. But I'd hate to see you take a step backwards with your web stuff. They are two totally different types of media. You have the content to make these top quality, don't settle for a B level design. With that said I wish you the best of luck and look forward to the Nautica site. __________________ "We are told to let our light shine, and if it does, we won't need to tell anybody it does. Lighthouses don't fire cannons to call attention to their shining- they just shine."

09-19-2005, 10:15 AM	#11
J-$ Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 2,090	not bad. more cum, and perhaps invest in a little originality for the designs thats bout it __________________

09-19-2005, 10:30 AM	#12
PornFact Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 76	i like them both.. __________________

09-19-2005, 11:25 AM	#13
Elli Reach for those stars! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 17,991	My two cents: The nautica site has a more unique and interesting design. I happen to like the colours, simply because they're different from other things out there. I would add more photos to the front, though. The other site looks like a cookie cutter of most the other video based sites out there. Just being honest. __________________ email: [email protected]

09-19-2005, 11:35 AM	#14
gdog Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: San Diego Posts: 1,550	They both look nice and clean, on the Nautica site I would put the tour on this page http://www.nauticathornxxx.com/home.php the one extra step will lose the traffic in my opinion. G __________________ Busty Amateurs is Back - Meet the Girls \| Read the BLOG \| See the UPDATES High conversions and high retention, almost 1000 hosted galleries 995 PAYS Samples Big Boobs \| Busty Babes \| Strap Ons \| Hardcore \| Amateurs \| Videos