GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   DRAMA: Time to Litigate !!! Ifriends better get this turned off ASAP ! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=511329)

BusterBunny 11-12-2006 10:02 PM

1 hundo..........

will76 11-12-2006 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars (Post 8130005)
dont fuck with my content or my copyrighted material you will get owned !

LOL you are all bark, no bite.

I guess this doesn't apply to zango.

Think about it. You get pissed off because someone registeres/uses a domain name that is close to yours, and you want to sue. I assume for losing traffic/income ? Why else would you sue.

Now here we have Zango that isn't using a domain close to yours, they are targeting YOUR domain, and you are losing a lot of traffic/income because of them. But in this case you say it is a waste of time to sue them. What happened to the lars that says " dont fuck with my content or my copyrighted material you will get owned !"

seeric 11-12-2006 10:04 PM

madawgz why did you bump this

Pete-KT 11-12-2006 10:18 PM

Kill them lars

Lazonby 11-12-2006 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete-KT (Post 11301325)
Kill them lars

Your bot always seems to have it's 'suck program owner's cock' setting on auto.

lazycash 11-12-2006 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 11301243)
madawgz why did you bump this

Looks like mardigras bumped it, not madawgz. Interesting bump considering the circumstances a year later.

CDSmith 11-12-2006 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301384)
Your bot always seems to have it's 'suck program owner's cock' setting on auto.

:1orglaugh okay that was good.

germ 11-12-2006 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimmy (Post 8135730)
Copyright infringement aside, this thread is tacky and totally unprofessional.

Lars, your thread title would imply that iFriends is directly stealing your material, your branding, and so on. A closer look shows that one of iFriends affiliates has taken liberties with your materials...and not iFriends themselves.

So, your attempt at drama to discredit iFriends has worked, but at the same time, iFriends could be equally justified at screaming back at you for this blatant slander.

I'm always amazed at how the industry leaders in this industry don't seem to have 2 bits of business sense to rub together.

ding ding ding. we have a winner.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 11-12-2006 11:09 PM

nice drama, pass the popcorn.....

SmokeyTheBear 11-12-2006 11:21 PM

heh rather ironic looking back at this thread that lars is trying to protect his copyrights yet nowadays every copyright thief around is promoting aff..

Lazonby 11-12-2006 11:25 PM

About time the new 'adult leadership' emerged, huh?

Having no ethical standards is so yesterday. How about some new guys step up and provide decent products.

Xplicit 11-12-2006 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11301591)
heh rather ironic looking back at this thread that lars is trying to protect his copyrights yet nowadays every copyright thief around is promoting aff..

Looks like the Legend of Lars has changed quite a bit over the past few months. :disgust

Paul Markham 11-13-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimmy (Post 8135730)
Copyright infringement aside, this thread is tacky and totally unprofessional.

Lars, your thread title would imply that iFriends is directly stealing your material, your branding, and so on. A closer look shows that one of iFriends affiliates has taken liberties with your materials...and not iFriends themselves.

So, your attempt at drama to discredit iFriends has worked, but at the same time, iFriends could be equally justified at screaming back at you for this blatant slander.

I'm always amazed at how the industry leaders in this industry don't seem to have 2 bits of business sense to rub together.

Not fair as we all know how strict and observant AFF are when dealing with affiliates who steal other peoples content to use it to drive traffic to AFF.

In fact I know for a fact that AFF employ 1,000 people doing nothing but checking all their affiliates and the ownership of the content they use to send traffic to AFF.

They are not one of these companies who might do something when it's it's reported to them. Depending on how much the affiliate is worth and who the guy is reporting it.

Last week AFF were everyones enemy, this week they are everyones friend. A week is a long time on GFY.

Paul Markham 11-13-2006 12:12 AM

Seems I missed the original post date.

09-02-2005, 01:44 AM

A year is an eternity on GFY.

lazycash 11-13-2006 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xplicit (Post 11301727)
Looks like the Legend of Lars has changed quite a bit over the past few months. :disgust

Yep, he's been one of the most likable and popular people in here over the last couple of years. I'm sure he's still a nice guy, unfortunately he put his ethics aside to make a few bucks and everyone happened to notice it because of all the zango hype.

I still think there's more to the story than has been posted. If the traffic from Zango only represented a very small portion as Lars initially claimed, then I don't see why he wouldn't have made the ethical decision and quit advertising via Zango. He and his program would have retained their popularity amongst webmasters and he wouldn't have lost webmasters who have chosen not to support them because of his decision. Either Zango represents a much larger portion of their traffic than he has let on, or he made a sizable traffic deposit with Zango and isn't ready to abandon it and his money at this point.

will76 11-13-2006 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 11301841)
Yep, he's been one of the most likable and popular people in here over the last couple of years. I'm sure he's still a nice guy, unfortunately he put his ethics aside to make a few bucks and everyone happened to notice it because of all the zango hype.

I still think there's more to the story than has been posted. If the traffic from Zango only represented a very small portion as Lars initially claimed, then I don't see why he wouldn't have made the ethical decision and quit advertising via Zango. He and his program would have retained their popularity amongst webmasters and he wouldn't have lost webmasters who have chosen not to support them because of his decision. Either Zango represents a much larger portion of their traffic than he has let on, or he made a sizable traffic deposit with Zango and isn't ready to abandon it and his money at this point.

One does make you wonder what makes AFF/Cams do the things they do. What about the fact they are still listed on ibill.com ??? I am sure that does not make them a lot of money but didn't Lars himself lose a ton of money to ibill, but now he either buys ads from them or has them as an affiliate.

They Seriously need to hire a PR guy. Their official statement from their attorney and Lars several post since then have been terrible. Besides the fact they shouldn't be doing it in the first place, they have handled the situation about as good as a 10 year old.

will76 11-13-2006 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301613)
About time the new 'adult leadership' emerged, huh?

Having no ethical standards is so yesterday. How about some new guys step up and provide decent products.


Amen to that. I pride myself on the fact that not one person here can say I have screwed them and I have done hundreds of thousands of dollars of transactions with people who post on GFY alone. I still do really well too, I don't have to cheat or screw anyone to get ahead. I could go create a spybot, err i mean "adware program" like zango and do the same thing they are doing but I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. I believe in karma and when you fuck people you will eventually get what is coming to you. It is one thing to market aggressivly, it is another to steal from the hardworking efforts of others. I know I wouldn't want someone to do it to me so I wouldn't do it to anyone else.

However it seems pretty popular here by some who do well that it is ok to do whatever it takes as long as it is technically "legal".

And then you have a 100+ million dollar a year company like AFF who could give a shit who they steal traffic/sales from and they will deal with shady sites/companies. :Oh crap Very Fucking sad.

pocketkangaroo 11-13-2006 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301384)
Your bot always seems to have it's 'suck program owner's cock' setting on auto.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

gooddomains 11-13-2006 01:54 AM

drama alert

gooddomains 11-13-2006 01:55 AM

got zango ?

Lazonby 11-13-2006 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 11301882)
Amen to that. I pride myself on the fact that not one person here can say I have screwed them and I have done hundreds of thousands of dollars of transactions with people who post on GFY alone. I still do really well too, I don't have to cheat or screw anyone to get ahead. I could go create a spybot, err i mean "adware program" like zango and do the same thing they are doing but I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. I believe in karma and when you fuck people you will eventually get what is coming to you. It is one thing to market aggressivly, it is another to steal from the hardworking efforts of others. I know I wouldn't want someone to do it to me so I wouldn't do it to anyone else.

However it seems pretty popular here by some who do well that it is ok to do whatever it takes as long as it is technically "legal".

And then you have a 100+ million dollar a year company like AFF who could give a shit who they steal traffic/sales from and they will deal with shady sites/companies. :Oh crap Very Fucking sad.

Absolutely. I had an argument in another thread with someone who was setting up a dating site with fake profiles and fake geo information and a bunch of idiots joined the thread to defend him. Wtf? Is anyone still in any doubt as to why the adult industry is universally not trusted? Has it occured to anyone that people might not want to give their credit card details to people who they assume, rightly or wrongly, but quite reasonably rightly, are charlatans?

There are a handful of companies which run decent programs, but isn't it about time that people come forward to create quality products, not based on lying to make them work, that consumers can buy with confidence?

It seems that there's this pervasive attitude that the surfer is there to be fucked over with substandard crap. Fucking idiots.

will76 11-13-2006 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11302326)
Absolutely. I had an argument in another thread with someone who was setting up a dating site with fake profiles and fake geo information and a bunch of idiots joined the thread to defend him. Wtf? Is anyone still in any doubt as to why the adult industry is universally not trusted? Has it occured to anyone that people might not want to give their credit card details to people who they assume, rightly or wrongly, but quite reasonably rightly, are charlatans?

There are a handful of companies which run decent programs, but isn't it about time that people come forward to create quality products, not based on lying to make them work, that consumers can buy with confidence?

It seems that there's this pervasive attitude that the surfer is there to be fucked over with substandard crap. Fucking idiots.


some people fuck over the surfers and the webmasters. Why to fuck over eveyone who is responsible for making you money. :thumbsup

jacklaidlaw 11-13-2006 12:24 PM

I think its bad that a massive company like aff is stealing from other small webmasters in this fashion I mean people need to make a living and you get a multi-million dollar company stealing the bread from their table (its so fucked up its sick)

CDSmith 11-13-2006 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301613)
About time the new 'adult leadership' emerged, huh?

Having no ethical standards is so yesterday. How about some new guys step up and provide decent products.

You may have missed this thread.

Lazonby 11-13-2006 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 11305106)
You may have missed this thread.

Yes, I did. It's a good step, but one of the first steps of a hundred mile journey.

RawAlex 11-13-2006 12:45 PM

I thought it was too expensive to send stuff to the lawyers.

I don't understand.

LiveDose 11-13-2006 12:50 PM

This thread is funny on many levels...

madawgz 11-13-2006 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 11301243)
madawgz why did you bump this

i didnt bump this, this is my first time posting in this thread :Oh crap

will76 11-13-2006 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz (Post 11305398)
i didnt bump this, this is my first time posting in this thread :Oh crap


Slacker :winkwink: post is over a year old and on # 128 and you are just getting your sig in here.

ForteCash 11-13-2006 01:06 PM

sue or shut the fuck up you zango using fuck :2 cents:

BlueWire 11-13-2006 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman! (Post 8129846)
damm are some people dumb :(

that being said ifrends will probaly can them for it.

...Their affiliate check will mysteriously stop coming and support emails will get ignored:1orglaugh


The way ifriends runs their affiliate company reminds me of the "Bob's" from office space laying off Milton:


Bob Slydell: Yeah, we can't actually find a record of him being a current employee here.

Bob Porter: I looked into it more deeply and I found that apparently what happened is that he was laid off five years ago and no one ever told him, but through some kind of glitch in the payroll department, he still gets a paycheck.

Bob Slydell: So we just went a ahead and fixed the glitch.

Bill Lumbergh: So um, Milton has been let go?

Bob Slydell: Well just a second there, professor. We uh, we fixed the *glitch*. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it will just work itself out naturally.

Bob Porter: We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem solved from your end.

http://www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/05/bob1a.jpg

ForteCash 11-13-2006 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 11301239)
LOL you are all bark, no bite.

I guess this doesn't apply to zango.

Think about it. You get pissed off because someone registeres/uses a domain name that is close to yours, and you want to sue. I assume for losing traffic/income ? Why else would you sue.

Now here we have Zango that isn't using a domain close to yours, they are targeting YOUR domain, and you are losing a lot of traffic/income because of them. But in this case you say it is a waste of time to sue them. What happened to the lars that says " dont fuck with my content or my copyrighted material you will get owned !"

couldnt have said it better myself :thumbsup

will76 11-13-2006 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForteCash (Post 11305718)
couldnt have said it better myself :thumbsup

Thanks...


Too bad Lars wont respond, well besides calling us a sheep.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123