U.S. Attorney's Porn Fight Gets Bad Reviews - GoFuckYourself.com

tony286 · 08-29-2005, 09:10 PM

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1125318960389

good article

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-29-2005, 09:19 PM

HEhe, go team Bush...

Fuck real crime, lets bust people having sex!

chase · 08-29-2005, 09:23 PM

This just bowls me over, it is so ridiculous:
"But should porn be a priority in a place like Miami, where serious crime is rampant? "It's all part of the same thing, of the organized crime syndicate," Sharp said. "It has an effect on children.""

directfiesta · 08-29-2005, 09:24 PM

-That's not true !

-This is not a real article

-This is not a real publication

- It's Clinton's fault

- Democrats are worse

- They will only touch child porn, no " regular" porn

ps: long read, but gives you an insight of what is cumming ....

The Sultan Of Smut · 08-29-2005, 09:32 PM

Wow, that was a good article. Very nice find!!!

tony286 · 08-29-2005, 09:33 PM

THank you you can get google news to send you all news article with a certain keyword. Its great

Paraskass · 08-29-2005, 09:41 PM

that is so fucking funny.

what is the USA coming to.

OMG

BlingDaddy · 08-29-2005, 09:41 PM

Reviews? I didn't review this site!

baddog · 08-29-2005, 09:56 PM

interesting read

TheSenator · 08-29-2005, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chase

This just bowls me over, it is so ridiculous:
"But should porn be a priority in a place like Miami, where serious crime is rampant? "It's all part of the same thing, of the organized crime syndicate," Sharp said. "It has an effect on children.""

That is just an ignorant statement.

Its like saying, "Randy Sharp is part of a fanatical terrorist group".

Fizzgig · 08-29-2005, 10:03 PM

How much stupidity will it take to get the Republicans voted out anyway?

The Truth Hurts · 08-29-2005, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fizzgig

How much stupidity will it take to get the Republicans voted out anyway?

a little more than showed up in 2004.

latinasojourn · 08-29-2005, 10:40 PM

the truth is ordinary, consensual appearing adult hardcore isn't going anywhere in the usa, and it doesn't matter what jerry falwell or pat robertson says.

the reason is simple. america has due process, and college students sit on juries these days.

and these college kids will laugh the government prosecutor right out of the courtroom if he tries to tell them a girl their age sucking dick is "obscene". remember this is the MTV generation that doesn't even think fellatio is "sex".

that genie has been out of the bottle for a very long time now. and that's why federal prosecutors don't want to deal with these kinds of cases---because they spend time in court rooms and have been belly to belly with actual juries, and know the demographics of jury pools. actual prosecutors aren't politicians, they live in the real world, and they know how cases are going to go before they try them---and they sure don't like to take a case they know they will lose---it's the worst thing they can do for their professional careers.

there are only so many peremptory challenges allowed, and you just can't get a jury to convict this stuff (ordinary consensual appearing adult hardcore).

now for content that you can't find in any small town adult video outlet it's a different story---but that is only maybe 1% of porn in the usa. that might be convictable, but even that is a grey area if the producer can provide model releases and proper 2257 docs. (extreme associates).

very tough in a free society to criminalize visual depictions of consensual acts between adults.

might be easier to bring democracy and "freedom" to a bunch of camel jockeys on the other side of world.

Oedipus · 08-30-2005, 12:00 AM

With the shift in enforcement priorities, time to shut down the porn operation and fire up the crystal meth lab.

xxxjay · 08-30-2005, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1125318960389

good article

Nice find Tony.

titmowse · 08-30-2005, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oedipus

With the shift in enforcement priorities, time to shut down the porn operation and fire up the crystal meth lab.

Ain't it the truth?

sniperwolf · 08-30-2005, 01:37 AM

pretty interesting article

08-29-2005, 09:10 PM	#1
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	U.S. Attorney's Porn Fight Gets Bad Reviews http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1125318960389 good article

08-29-2005, 09:19 PM	#2
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	HEhe, go team Bush... Fuck real crime, lets bust people having sex! __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

08-29-2005, 09:23 PM	#3
chase Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Tampa Bay Posts: 6,019	This just bowls me over, it is so ridiculous: "But should porn be a priority in a place like Miami, where serious crime is rampant? "It's all part of the same thing, of the organized crime syndicate," Sharp said. "It has an effect on children."" __________________ Need Hosting? Reality Check Network services me purrrfectly!

08-29-2005, 09:24 PM	#4
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,677	-That's not true ! -This is not a real article -This is not a real publication - It's Clinton's fault - Democrats are worse - They will only touch child porn, no " regular" porn ps: long read, but gives you an insight of what is cumming .... __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

08-29-2005, 09:41 PM	#7
Paraskass Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: QC Posts: 5,829	that is so fucking funny. what is the USA coming to. OMG __________________

08-29-2005, 09:32 PM	#5
The Sultan Of Smut Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Vancouver Posts: 4,325	Wow, that was a good article. Very nice find!!!

08-29-2005, 09:33 PM	#6
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	THank you you can get google news to send you all news article with a certain keyword. Its great

08-29-2005, 09:41 PM	#8
BlingDaddy Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Denver, CO ICQ 280-752-076 Posts: 6,343	Reviews? I didn't review this site! __________________ Every Day... Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station! Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station! The Daily Bag of Douche - Humor at it's FINEST.

08-29-2005, 09:56 PM	#9
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	interesting read

08-29-2005, 10:03 PM	#11
Fizzgig Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: In Your Dreams Posts: 9,649	How much stupidity will it take to get the Republicans voted out anyway? __________________ ---'-,-{@ Sassy Grrrl @}-'-,---

08-29-2005, 10:40 PM	#13
latinasojourn Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,191	the truth is ordinary, consensual appearing adult hardcore isn't going anywhere in the usa, and it doesn't matter what jerry falwell or pat robertson says. the reason is simple. america has due process, and college students sit on juries these days. and these college kids will laugh the government prosecutor right out of the courtroom if he tries to tell them a girl their age sucking dick is "obscene". remember this is the MTV generation that doesn't even think fellatio is "sex". that genie has been out of the bottle for a very long time now. and that's why federal prosecutors don't want to deal with these kinds of cases---because they spend time in court rooms and have been belly to belly with actual juries, and know the demographics of jury pools. actual prosecutors aren't politicians, they live in the real world, and they know how cases are going to go before they try them---and they sure don't like to take a case they know they will lose---it's the worst thing they can do for their professional careers. there are only so many peremptory challenges allowed, and you just can't get a jury to convict this stuff (ordinary consensual appearing adult hardcore). now for content that you can't find in any small town adult video outlet it's a different story---but that is only maybe 1% of porn in the usa. that might be convictable, but even that is a grey area if the producer can provide model releases and proper 2257 docs. (extreme associates). very tough in a free society to criminalize visual depictions of consensual acts between adults. might be easier to bring democracy and "freedom" to a bunch of camel jockeys on the other side of world.

08-30-2005, 12:00 AM	#14
Oedipus Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 190	With the shift in enforcement priorities, time to shut down the porn operation and fire up the crystal meth lab.

08-30-2005, 01:37 AM	#17
sniperwolf Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 17,743	pretty interesting article __________________ ~Accepting design works~