Would you eat this? (news) - GoFuckYourself.com

$5 submissions · 08-16-2005, 05:29 AM

I don't know if this has been posted before so...

http://www.local6.com/news/4851623/detail.htm

Meat grown from test tubes.

Why?

Less environmentally damaging
Better conditions than current meat raising methods (for the PETA crowd)

Downside:

If you think chickens pumped with Cipro (antibiotic) is problematic enough, wait till you see what kinds of antibiotics and other chemicals they pump into this.

On the upside:

Slim Jim's beef jerky strips' costs just went down

Your thoughts?

Basic_man · 08-16-2005, 05:30 AM

URL isn't working ... but no I would not eat such thing !

$5 submissions · 08-16-2005, 05:32 AM

Source: local6.com

A research team is proposing a new technique that would allow meat to be grown in a laboratory for mass consumption, according to a report.

Researchers in the U.S. say the technology now exists now to produce processed meats such as burgers and sausages, starting with cells taken from cows, chickens, pigs, fish or other animals.

Growing meat without the animal would not only reduce the need for the animals -- which often are kept in less than ideal conditions -- but may also address a number of environmental ills blamed on meat production.

Cultured meat could also be tailored to be healthier than farm-raised meat, while satisfying the increasing demand for protein by the world's growing population, proponents say.

Industrializing the process could involve growing muscle cells on large sheets or beads suspended in a growth medium.

Once the cells have grown enough, they could be scraped off and packaged. If edible sheets or beads are used, all of it could be eaten.

But butchers and vegetarians are just two groups of people who are yet to be convinced.

"To he honest anything they can do with test tubes or whatever, it can't be made," butcher Rodney Macken said.

"I don't like eating a cow that's been pumped full of growth hormones that artificially grow it so it gets onto our plates quicker," a diner said. " I would feel the same about a lump of meat that had been pumped full of chemicals and that had been artificially modified."

Supporters also said growing meat would reduce the number of animals killed and cut environmental waste that comes from livestock.

naugthygUrL · 08-16-2005, 05:35 AM

link not found..

wildgirl · 08-16-2005, 06:20 AM

Didn't found here too, anyway I'm not going to eat that kind of thing!

08-16-2005, 05:29 AM	#1
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	Would you eat this? (news) I don't know if this has been posted before so... http://www.local6.com/news/4851623/detail.htm Meat grown from test tubes. Why? Less environmentally damaging Better conditions than current meat raising methods (for the PETA crowd) Downside: If you think chickens pumped with Cipro (antibiotic) is problematic enough, wait till you see what kinds of antibiotics and other chemicals they pump into this. On the upside: Slim Jim's beef jerky strips' costs just went down Your thoughts? __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

08-16-2005, 05:30 AM	#2
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	URL isn't working ... but no I would not eat such thing ! __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

08-16-2005, 05:32 AM	#3
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	Source: local6.com A research team is proposing a new technique that would allow meat to be grown in a laboratory for mass consumption, according to a report. Researchers in the U.S. say the technology now exists now to produce processed meats such as burgers and sausages, starting with cells taken from cows, chickens, pigs, fish or other animals. Growing meat without the animal would not only reduce the need for the animals -- which often are kept in less than ideal conditions -- but may also address a number of environmental ills blamed on meat production. Cultured meat could also be tailored to be healthier than farm-raised meat, while satisfying the increasing demand for protein by the world's growing population, proponents say. Industrializing the process could involve growing muscle cells on large sheets or beads suspended in a growth medium. Once the cells have grown enough, they could be scraped off and packaged. If edible sheets or beads are used, all of it could be eaten. But butchers and vegetarians are just two groups of people who are yet to be convinced. "To he honest anything they can do with test tubes or whatever, it can't be made," butcher Rodney Macken said. "I don't like eating a cow that's been pumped full of growth hormones that artificially grow it so it gets onto our plates quicker," a diner said. " I would feel the same about a lump of meat that had been pumped full of chemicals and that had been artificially modified." Supporters also said growing meat would reduce the number of animals killed and cut environmental waste that comes from livestock. __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

08-16-2005, 05:35 AM	#4
naugthygUrL Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 3,448	link not found.. __________________ +++ Sign up for a FREE WEEK \| ICQ: 305-643-679 +++ ---> NO CONTRACT AND HIDDEN CHARGES <--- SPECIAL AUG. DISCOUNTS !!! -- https://gfy.com/sell-and-buy-forum/507204-hurry-limited-august-offer.html

08-16-2005, 06:20 AM	#5
wildgirl My Sig was too Big! :( Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,554	Didn't found here too, anyway I'm not going to eat that kind of thing! __________________ My Best Money Maker: