US military team tried to alert FBI about attack in 2000 - GoFuckYourself.com

VeriSexy · 08-18-2005, 12:58 AM

US military team tried to alert FBI about attack in 2000

A US military intelligence team had tried to alert the FBI in 2000 about the existence of an American-based terrorist cell that included the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks, but its efforts had been blocked by US military lawyers, The New York Times reported Wednesday.

The newspaper quoted Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a veteran Army intelligence officer, as saying that the small, highly classified intelligence program, known as Able Danger, had identified the terrorist ringleader, Mohamed Atta, and three other future hijackers by name by mid-2000, and tried to arrange a meeting that summer with FBI agents to share its information.

But according to Shaffer, US military lawyers forced members of Able Danger to cancel three scheduled meetings with the FBI at the last minute because they feared controversy if Able Danger was portrayed as a military operation that had violated the privacy of civilians who were legally in the United States.

The information that Able Danger tried to pass on to the FBI might have led to Atta and the other terrorists while the Sept. 11 attacks were still being planned, Shaffer said.

Shaffer also told the newspaper that he was not involved in the details of the procedures used in Able Danger to gather information from terrorist databases, nor was he aware of which databases had supplied the information that might have led to the name of Atta or other terrorists so long before the Sept. 11 attacks.

But he said he did know that Able Danger had made use of publicly available information from government immigration agencies, Internet sites and paid search engines like LexisNexis.

http://english.people.com.cn/200508/...18_203177.html

tristan_D · 08-18-2005, 01:16 AM

I have heard about those speculations. so much lessons have 9/11 taught those feds.

blazin · 08-18-2005, 01:33 AM

The powers that be knew 9/11 was gonna happen, they let it happen.

Just like they'll let the next one happen so they can go after Iran with public support.

junction · 08-18-2005, 02:28 AM

www.PeterLance.com

Alky · 08-18-2005, 02:31 AM

wasn't 9/11 in 2001?

VeriSexy · 08-18-2005, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alky

wasn't 9/11 in 2001?

"US military intelligence team had tried to alert the FBI in 2000 about the existence of an American-based terrorist cell that included the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks, but its efforts had been blocked by US military lawyers"

Alky · 08-18-2005, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeriSexy

"US military intelligence team had tried to alert the FBI in 2000 about the existence of an American-based terrorist cell that included the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks, but its efforts had been blocked by US military lawyers"

misleading thread title... it can be interpreted both ways

jimmyf · 08-18-2005, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alky

misleading thread title... it can be interpreted both ways

yep

don't know if it was US military lawyers per say.

more like Clinton lawyers

PixeLs · 08-18-2005, 04:58 AM

NO doubt why US intelligence sucks..lol

killerkay · 08-18-2005, 05:06 AM

US Intelligence don't suck asshole, we're decades ahead of anybody else

directfiesta · 08-18-2005, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killerkay

US Intelligence don't suck asshole, we're decades ahead of anybody else

must stink to be the others ....

Tom_PM · 08-18-2005, 06:53 AM

Maybe if congress had sent up a bill to tap suspected terrorists phones in 1996 like Clinton begged them to, this would have been prevented. You can alter a giant asteroids course easliy if you deflect it soon enough.

"We are fighting terrorism on all fronts with a three-pronged strategy. First, we are working to rally a world coalition with zero- tolerance for terrorism. Just this month I signed a law imposing harsh sanctions on foreign companies that invest in key sectors of the Iranian and Libyan economies.

As long as Iran trains, supports and protects terrorists, as long as Libya refuses to give up the people who blew up Pan Am 103, they will pay a price from the United States.

Second, we must give law endorsement the tools they need to take the fight to terrorists. We need new laws to crack down on money laundering and to prosecute and punish those who commit violent acts against American citizens abroad; to add chemical markers or taggants to gunpowder used in bombs so we can track the bombmakers.

To extend the same power police now have against organized crime to save lives by tapping all the phones that terrorists use. Terrorists are as big a threat to our future, perhaps bigger, than organized crime. Why should we have two different standards for a common threat to the safety of America and our children?

We need, in short, the laws that Congress refused to pass. And I ask them again -- please, as an American, not a partisan, matter, pass these laws now."

Excerpt from Clintons 1996 democratic convention speech.

wedouglas · 08-18-2005, 08:18 AM

Can we drop the 9/11 "what ifs' yet? It's over.

08-18-2005, 12:58 AM	#1
VeriSexy Join The Royal Family Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 25,463	US military team tried to alert FBI about attack in 2000 US military team tried to alert FBI about attack in 2000 A US military intelligence team had tried to alert the FBI in 2000 about the existence of an American-based terrorist cell that included the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks, but its efforts had been blocked by US military lawyers, The New York Times reported Wednesday. The newspaper quoted Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a veteran Army intelligence officer, as saying that the small, highly classified intelligence program, known as Able Danger, had identified the terrorist ringleader, Mohamed Atta, and three other future hijackers by name by mid-2000, and tried to arrange a meeting that summer with FBI agents to share its information. But according to Shaffer, US military lawyers forced members of Able Danger to cancel three scheduled meetings with the FBI at the last minute because they feared controversy if Able Danger was portrayed as a military operation that had violated the privacy of civilians who were legally in the United States. The information that Able Danger tried to pass on to the FBI might have led to Atta and the other terrorists while the Sept. 11 attacks were still being planned, Shaffer said. Shaffer also told the newspaper that he was not involved in the details of the procedures used in Able Danger to gather information from terrorist databases, nor was he aware of which databases had supplied the information that might have led to the name of Atta or other terrorists so long before the Sept. 11 attacks. But he said he did know that Able Danger had made use of publicly available information from government immigration agencies, Internet sites and paid search engines like LexisNexis. http://english.people.com.cn/200508/...18_203177.html __________________ Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN! Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos. With TOP RATIO Sites like TeenStarsOnly.com - Earn $$ with our New Site & Bonus Payouts!! ATMovs.com \| iTeenVideo.com \| TeenSexMovs.com \| TeenSexMania.com

08-18-2005, 01:16 AM	#2
tristan_D Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 7,865	I have heard about those speculations. so much lessons have 9/11 taught those feds. __________________ Increase your sales. Up to $4 per click.

08-18-2005, 01:33 AM	#3
blazin Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 2,781	The powers that be knew 9/11 was gonna happen, they let it happen. Just like they'll let the next one happen so they can go after Iran with public support. __________________ I don't endorse a god damn thing......

08-18-2005, 04:58 AM	#9
PixeLs Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 11,922	NO doubt why US intelligence sucks..lol __________________ Make money on any traffic. Bi-weekly payments with no hold.

08-18-2005, 05:06 AM	#10
killerkay Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: amish paradise Posts: 1,482	US Intelligence don't suck asshole, we're decades ahead of anybody else __________________ $$$ UP TO 5$ PER FREE SIGNUP! $$$

08-18-2005, 02:28 AM	#4
junction Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Midwest Posts: 2,411	www.PeterLance.com

08-18-2005, 02:31 AM	#5
Alky Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Houston Posts: 5,651	wasn't 9/11 in 2001?

08-18-2005, 06:53 AM	#12
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Maybe if congress had sent up a bill to tap suspected terrorists phones in 1996 like Clinton begged them to, this would have been prevented. You can alter a giant asteroids course easliy if you deflect it soon enough. "We are fighting terrorism on all fronts with a three-pronged strategy. First, we are working to rally a world coalition with zero- tolerance for terrorism. Just this month I signed a law imposing harsh sanctions on foreign companies that invest in key sectors of the Iranian and Libyan economies. As long as Iran trains, supports and protects terrorists, as long as Libya refuses to give up the people who blew up Pan Am 103, they will pay a price from the United States. Second, we must give law endorsement the tools they need to take the fight to terrorists. We need new laws to crack down on money laundering and to prosecute and punish those who commit violent acts against American citizens abroad; to add chemical markers or taggants to gunpowder used in bombs so we can track the bombmakers. To extend the same power police now have against organized crime to save lives by tapping all the phones that terrorists use. Terrorists are as big a threat to our future, perhaps bigger, than organized crime. Why should we have two different standards for a common threat to the safety of America and our children? We need, in short, the laws that Congress refused to pass. And I ask them again -- please, as an American, not a partisan, matter, pass these laws now." Excerpt from Clintons 1996 democratic convention speech. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

08-18-2005, 08:18 AM	#13
wedouglas So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Dearborn, MI Posts: 5,921	Can we drop the 9/11 "what ifs' yet? It's over.