I wonder if Google knows that its showing child porn? - GoFuckYourself.com

Rob · 08-06-2005, 03:50 PM

If you do an image search for a pretty popular adult term then it pulls up all sorts of child porn images! I'm talking 7 and 8 year olds getting fucked. Sick shit!

I wonder if Google knows this? And no, I'm not telling you sick fucks what the search term is so don't bother asking.

Manowar · 08-06-2005, 03:51 PM

is it wrong if i think it would be comical someone saying "this thread is useless without pics" ?

fusionx · 08-06-2005, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

If you do an image search for a pretty popular adult term then it pulls up all sorts of child porn images! I'm talking 7 and 8 year olds getting fucked. Sick shit!

I wonder if Google knows this? And no, I'm not telling you sick fucks what the search term is so don't bother asking.

Here's a catch-22.. if they pull those cp images, they admit they have editorial control, and thus are subject to 2257.. if they leave them there, because they don't have editorial control, they are not subject to 2257.

it's a bitch, ain't it?

Rob · 08-06-2005, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fusionx

Here's a catch-22.. if they pull those cp images, they admit they have editorial control, and thus are subject to 2257.. if they leave them there, because they don't have editorial control, they are not subject to 2257.

it's a bitch, ain't it?

Damn! Didn't even think about it that way. Really is a catch 22.

Dalai lama · 08-06-2005, 03:54 PM

Google is just a search engine. You would be surprised how many people actually search for child porn ect.

BastarD · 08-06-2005, 03:55 PM

I bet there is no possibility to filter jpegs, only way of fighting against it is checking and banning this kind of sick shit.. and google is lazy

Deej · 08-06-2005, 03:56 PM

gross

_Puke

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 03:56 PM

Not only is there absolutely no pictures of "7 and 8 years getting fucked" on google images for popular search terms, those pictures aren't there for any search terms. There are plenty of grey-area pictures, but none that blatant.

dig420 · 08-06-2005, 03:57 PM

what about people who exploit the terms child porn to get sig views?

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinnywussy

Not only is there absolutely no pictures of "7 and 8 years getting fucked" on google images for popular search terms, those pictures aren't there for any search terms. There are plenty of grey-area pictures, but none that blatant.

Wanna bet?

webair · 08-06-2005, 04:02 PM

let them know about is so they can deal wiith it accordingly

wedouglas · 08-06-2005, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fusionx

Here's a catch-22.. if they pull those cp images, they admit they have editorial control, and thus are subject to 2257.. if they leave them there, because they don't have editorial control, they are not subject to 2257.

it's a bitch, ain't it?

they could pull them and tell no one. i dont think anyone would care. could also just call the authorities.

ether way, there isnt any child porn on google images for a popular adult word to begin with

pornguy · 08-06-2005, 04:10 PM

The sad thing is, that for a week or so, in the google image search, you could not find adult photos. Now they are back. But anyway, I was doing some keyword searches, and came up with some really sick shit in the lists. just look at the keyword teen.

Murderous · 08-06-2005, 04:14 PM

You won't say what it is, because you don't want us knowing what it was you were looking for, since it obviously wasn't an adult related term.

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murderous

You won't say what it is, because you don't want us knowing what it was you were looking for, since it obviously wasn't an adult related term.

Are you serious?

MyNameIsEmily · 08-06-2005, 04:18 PM

who gives a fuck

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyNameIsEmily

who gives a fuck

Obviously you did since you clicked on this thread.

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 04:22 PM

HighOnAcid's insightful replies to accusations that he's full of shit:

"Are you serious?"
"Wanna bet?"

wedouglas · 08-06-2005, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

The sad thing is, that for a week or so, in the google image search, you could not find adult photos. Now they are back. But anyway, I was doing some keyword searches, and came up with some really sick shit in the lists. just look at the keyword teen.

the word teen looks fine to me. i didnt notice anything akward. just normal porn.

i did, however, find this haha kind of funny. whats this kid doing out at this party/mardi graw

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinnywussy

HighOnAcid's insightful replies to accusations that he's full of shit:

"Are you serious?"
"Wanna bet?"

Ok, dickhead, what do you want me to do? Post the samples? Yeah, that's just fucking brilliant. Ooh...how about I post the search term so every fucking pedophile that frequents this board can "cash in" on my freak find.

Bro, you obviously don't know me. I don't talk shit. I don't need "sig money", and I'm not one to cry wolf. When you can wipe the drool over your face from all these "Would you hit it?" threads, get back to me. Until then, get fucked.

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 04:28 PM

HighOnAcid's insightful replies to accusations that he's full of shit:

"Are you serious?"
"Wanna bet?"
"Get fucked."

riddler · 08-06-2005, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinnywussy

HighOnAcid's insightful replies to accusations that he's full of shit:

"Are you serious?"
"Wanna bet?"
"Get fucked."

fuck off surfer, you just want to see some child porn..

Mr.Right - Banned For Life · 08-06-2005, 04:31 PM

With all the money Google makes, i think they should set up a department to get rid of all those sick websites in search engines,

Batts

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riddler

fuck off surfer, you just want to see some child porn..

I think your buddy would appreciate it if you'd let him speak for himself.

riddler · 08-06-2005, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinnywussy

I think your buddy would appreciate it if you'd let him speak for himself.

i dont know fucking highonacid, i'm telling you how i see it, get fucked you piece of shit surfer looking for some free child porn..

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riddler

i dont know fucking highonacid, i'm telling you how i see it, get fucked you piece of shit surfer looking for some free child porn..

Hear that? Sounds like the hammer hitting the nail right on the head!

jimmyf · 08-06-2005, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BastarD

I bet there is no possibility to filter jpegs, only way of fighting against it is checking and banning this kind of sick shit.. and google is lazy

don't know about being lazy

The cost of checking would be out of sight.. they would have 2 hire thousands

jimmyf · 08-06-2005, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Wanna bet?

I'm with you, I've seen them...

Murderous · 08-06-2005, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Are you serious?

For the most part... yes. I am not insinuating anything, I just think this thread is shitty, so there.

So far you are the only one calling people on this board pedophiles... with the exception of a few "leet" webmasters, the rest of us really are business minded adults.

Which btw, has nothing to do with NEEDING sig money.

riddler · 08-06-2005, 04:37 PM

I've seen sick shit on google, To think child porn does not show up on its image searches is narrow minded, They do not police it because they really cant with out a huge amount of resources and if they policed that then they would have to police other shit.. that is why they offer the safe filter..

jimmyf · 08-06-2005, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Are you serious?

sure they are serious... And a moron, a serious moron. OMG

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Hear that? Sounds like the hammer hitting the nail right on the head!

Congrats on making a new friend. ;)

AdnerAdvertising · 08-06-2005, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

If you do an image search for a pretty popular adult term then it pulls up all sorts of child porn images! I'm talking 7 and 8 year olds getting fucked. Sick shit!

I wonder if Google knows this? And no, I'm not telling you sick fucks what the search term is so don't bother asking.

Dude your lame for even searching for that special "term" on image search

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murderous

For the most part... yes. I am not insinuating anything, I just think this thread is shitty, so there.

So far you are the only one calling people on this board pedophiles... with the exception of a few "leet" webmasters, the rest of us really are business minded adults.

Which btw, has nothing to do with NEEDING sig money.

Do me a favor and take a few minutes to read the thread before casting stones. You can go to Google image search right now and do a search for BOTTLED WATER and a porn image pops up. Go ahead, try it. I'll wait.

If this thread is so "shitty" then why do you choose to camp out? Why not just move on and let it die? I think your posts are shitty, so there! [sic]

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdnerAdvertising

Dude your lame for even searching for that special "term" on image search

Funny how all the shit talkers have 1000 or less posts. Trolls and surfers must be out in force tonight.

ICQ me and I'll give you the search terms that I used. You will go and see what I'm talking about. Although, I will post our ICQ log.

SmokeyTheBear · 08-06-2005, 04:46 PM

of course they do. they know and make money from it..

How else could you explain google adwords SUGGESTING you to buy child porn keywords..

--------------------
Here are additional keywords to consider: for PORN

nasty
underage
bitches
amateurs
hottie
hahahahas
kiddie

AdnerAdvertising · 08-06-2005, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Funny how all the shit talkers have 1000 or less posts. Trolls and surfers must be out in force tonight.

ICQ me and I'll give you the search terms that I used. You will go and see what I'm talking about. Although, I will post our ICQ log.

Call me a troll or "surfer" but your the fag searching for kiddie porn terms

and no i don't want to ICQ you freakboy -

Murderous · 08-06-2005, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Do me a favor and take a few minutes to read the thread before casting stones. You can go to Google image search right now and do a search for BOTTLED WATER and a porn image pops up. Go ahead, try it. I'll wait.

If this thread is so "shitty" then why do you choose to camp out? Why not just move on and let it die? I think your posts are shitty, so there! [sic]

haha... that is ok dude. don't take it personal. but like others said, just report the sites or notify google or don't use those terms anymore...

one more thing. don't post it here cause nobodu really cares. we know it's out there, we have all stumbled across it.

happy now?

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 04:49 PM

Anybody that doesn't agree with HighOnAcid is a pedophile.

Hey, buddy, since you're trying so hard here, I'll give you a clue. There is still a significant CP presence on the internet, but the actual cp on the WEB is minimal and removed as soon as spotted.

*edit* and I'm talking about "7 and 8 year olds getting fucked" here, not grey-area shit.

Rob · 08-06-2005, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

of course they do. they know and make money from it..

How else could you explain google adwords SUGGESTING you to buy child porn keywords..

Thank you, Smokey. I know for a fact that you know what you're talking about.

broke · 08-06-2005, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighOnAcid

Damn! Didn't even think about it that way. Really is a catch 22.

No, it's not.

Unless -- you want to bank your stock options/stocks on the backs of children forced to 'perform'.

broke · 08-06-2005, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinnywussy

Hey, buddy, since you're trying so hard here, I'll give you a clue. There is still a significant CP presence on the internet, but the actual cp on the WEB is minimal and removed as soon as spotted.

Who spots and deletes CP?

High Plains Drifter · 08-06-2005, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broke

Who spots and deletes CP?

I meant reported. But basically what I was saying in all web cp is very short-term. Why would you use the web if there's a hundred other internet options? Once again, I'm only talking about "6 and 7 years old getting fucked", not teenagers.

broke · 08-06-2005, 05:14 PM

What you said was...

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinnywussy

actual cp on the WEB is minimal and removed as soon as spotted.

Who EXACTLY spots it and deletes it when talking about those "6 and 7 years old[s] getting fucked"?

Do you honestly think that google doesn't cache and serve CP images and there's nothing they can do about it?

I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

wedouglas · 08-06-2005, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broke

I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

wedouglas · 08-06-2005, 05:20 PM

something jsut went through my head. seeing that CP is illegal and very punishable, how many people publish it in places that google can easily find?

I know google can find a hell of a lot of stuff, but google wont find what you dont want it to find.

why would anybody with cp be so careless to allow it to be found by something like google.

KMR Stitch · 08-06-2005, 05:21 PM

THIS thread is useless without pix!!!

lmao J/K on that one

SmokeyTheBear · 08-06-2005, 05:27 PM

I think the whole point is , google spends alot of time researching more ways to make more money faster, and to make the service better.

But they cant seem to find the time or manpower to write "simple" filters to block obvious cp and cp keywords..

When i complained about them offering to sell cp keywords , i got a reply from google that simply said they did not have enough manpower to verify each keyword as they are chose through an automated system ( umm wtf then find the manpower)

VeriSexy · 08-06-2005, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fusionx

Here's a catch-22.. if they pull those cp images, they admit they have editorial control, and thus are subject to 2257.. if they leave them there, because they don't have editorial control, they are not subject to 2257.

it's a bitch, ain't it?

Google is way to big to have anythng happen to them. Even if they get sued, they can afford it

BastarD · 08-06-2005, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyf

don't know about being lazy

The cost of checking would be out of sight.. they would have 2 hire thousands

for sho', but isn't it rather neccessary than option ?

08-06-2005, 03:50 PM	#1
Rob I'm a great bowler. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Right Outside of Normal. Posts: 13,309	I wonder if Google knows that its showing child porn? If you do an image search for a pretty popular adult term then it pulls up all sorts of child porn images! I'm talking 7 and 8 year olds getting fucked. Sick shit! I wonder if Google knows this? And no, I'm not telling you sick fucks what the search term is so don't bother asking. __________________

08-06-2005, 03:54 PM	#5
Dalai lama Strength and Honor Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 16,540	Google is just a search engine. You would be surprised how many people actually search for child porn ect. __________________ A program you can trust. Gallerybooster Run multiply TGPs of 1 script

08-06-2005, 03:56 PM	#7
Deej I make pixels work Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I live here... Posts: 24,386	gross _Puke __________________ Deej's Designs n' What Not Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching Icq#30096880

08-06-2005, 03:56 PM	#8
High Plains Drifter Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ♠ ♣ ♥ Posts: 2,341	Not only is there absolutely no pictures of "7 and 8 years getting fucked" on google images for popular search terms, those pictures aren't there for any search terms. There are plenty of grey-area pictures, but none that blatant. __________________

08-06-2005, 04:02 PM	#11
webair Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: NYC, NY Posts: 8,531	let them know about is so they can deal wiith it accordingly __________________ ~ Webair Dedicated Cloud Servers™ ~ WEBAIR VSYS™ Virtual Hosting Platform ~ Superior CDN Network ~ ~ Managed Dedicated hosting Specialists ~ DISCOUNT DOMAIN NAMES! ~ WEBAIR FUSION IO MANAGED CLOUD SERVERS! ~ *ICQ:* 243116321 - *TWITTER* - @WEBAIRINC - E-Mail: [email protected]

08-06-2005, 03:51 PM	#2
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	is it wrong if i think it would be comical someone saying "this thread is useless without pics" ?

08-06-2005, 03:55 PM	#6
BastarD Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Very close to that Jack Daniels bottle.. Posts: 6,341	I bet there is no possibility to filter jpegs, only way of fighting against it is checking and banning this kind of sick shit.. and google is lazy

08-06-2005, 03:57 PM	#9
dig420 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 9,240	what about people who exploit the terms child porn to get sig views?

08-06-2005, 04:10 PM	#13
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	The sad thing is, that for a week or so, in the google image search, you could not find adult photos. Now they are back. But anyway, I was doing some keyword searches, and came up with some really sick shit in the lists. just look at the keyword teen. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

08-06-2005, 04:14 PM	#14
Murderous Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 3,938	You won't say what it is, because you don't want us knowing what it was you were looking for, since it obviously wasn't an adult related term.

08-06-2005, 04:18 PM	#16
MyNameIsEmily Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 887	who gives a fuck __________________

08-06-2005, 04:22 PM	#18
High Plains Drifter Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ♠ ♣ ♥ Posts: 2,341	HighOnAcid's insightful replies to accusations that he's full of shit: "Are you serious?" "Wanna bet?" __________________

08-06-2005, 04:28 PM	#21
High Plains Drifter Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ♠ ♣ ♥ Posts: 2,341	HighOnAcid's insightful replies to accusations that he's full of shit: "Are you serious?" "Wanna bet?" "Get fucked." __________________

08-06-2005, 04:31 PM	#23
Mr.Right - Banned For Life I guarantee it Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 18,314	With all the money Google makes, i think they should set up a department to get rid of all those sick websites in search engines, Batts

08-06-2005, 04:37 PM	#30
riddler Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: up in gang bang heaven Posts: 3,726	I've seen sick shit on google, To think child porn does not show up on its image searches is narrow minded, They do not police it because they really cant with out a huge amount of resources and if they policed that then they would have to police other shit.. that is why they offer the safe filter..

08-06-2005, 04:46 PM	#36
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	of course they do. they know and make money from it.. How else could you explain google adwords SUGGESTING you to buy child porn keywords.. -------------------- Here are additional keywords to consider: for PORN nasty underage bitches amateurs hottie hahahahas kiddie __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

08-06-2005, 04:49 PM	#39
High Plains Drifter Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ♠ ♣ ♥ Posts: 2,341	Anybody that doesn't agree with HighOnAcid is a pedophile. Hey, buddy, since you're trying so hard here, I'll give you a clue. There is still a significant CP presence on the internet, but the actual cp on the WEB is minimal and removed as soon as spotted. edit and I'm talking about "7 and 8 year olds getting fucked" here, not grey-area shit. __________________

08-06-2005, 05:20 PM	#46
wedouglas So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Dearborn, MI Posts: 5,921	something jsut went through my head. seeing that CP is illegal and very punishable, how many people publish it in places that google can easily find? I know google can find a hell of a lot of stuff, but google wont find what you dont want it to find. why would anybody with cp be so careless to allow it to be found by something like google.

08-06-2005, 05:21 PM	#47
KMR Stitch I am cool Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 14,494	THIS thread is useless without pix!!! lmao J/K on that one

08-06-2005, 05:27 PM	#48
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	I think the whole point is , google spends alot of time researching more ways to make more money faster, and to make the service better. But they cant seem to find the time or manpower to write "simple" filters to block obvious cp and cp keywords.. When i complained about them offering to sell cp keywords , i got a reply from google that simply said they did not have enough manpower to verify each keyword as they are chose through an automated system ( umm wtf then find the manpower) __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com