Roberts Failed to Disclose Lobbyist Work - GoFuckYourself.com

SouthernGirl · 08-04-2005, 10:05 AM

Roberts Failed to Disclose Lobbyist Work

- - - - - - - - - - - -

August 04,2005 | WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court nominee John Roberts has acknowledged he should have disclosed to a Senate committee that he worked as lobbyist for the cosmetics industry in 2001.

In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee late Wednesday, Roberts wrote that he neglected to reveal that work in response to the panel's questionnaire asking about his lobbying activities. Confirmation hearings begin Sept. 6.

The work, which was on behalf of the Cosmetics, Toiletries and Fragrances Association, involved an effort to stave off a regulatory change involving sunscreen.

Roberts, a lawyer in private practice at the time, suggested that he did not think of disclosing the information because the nature of the work -- in which he met with lawyers at the federal Office of Management and Budget and the Food and Drug Administration -- did not seem political.

"My conversations with the government attorneys were focused on the prospect of litigation," Roberts said in a four-paragraph letter addressed to Vermont Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, the panel's ranking Democrat. "Consequently, the question about lobbying on the questionnaire did not trigger a memory of these meetings."

Newsday first reported Wednesday that Roberts had done the lobbyist work, resulting in the suspension of stricter labeling rules for sunscreen.

Doc911 · 08-04-2005, 10:14 AM

Quote:

"My conversations with the government attorneys were focused on the prospect of litigation,"

isn't that what lobbyists do?

SouthernGirl · 08-04-2005, 10:15 AM

yes it is. rather convenient to forget working as a lobbyist until a major national publication prints indisputable proof. please.

ChefJeff · 08-04-2005, 10:24 AM

This guy is nothing more than a Bush lap dog. Maybe the worst choice for the SUPREME court.

tristan_D · 08-04-2005, 08:34 PM

if its from Bush it must be the worst.

kane · 08-04-2005, 10:50 PM

the best part of this whole thing is how Bush says he wants a partisan effort and a fair deal and no politcal crap involved then he says "oh and don't ask us for any other papers on him." so he wants people to work with him, but not the reverse.

tony286 · 08-04-2005, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

the best part of this whole thing is how Bush says he wants a partisan effort and a fair deal and no politcal crap involved then he says "oh and don't ask us for any other papers on him." so he wants people to work with him, but not the reverse.

its such bullshit

08-04-2005, 10:05 AM	#1
SouthernGirl So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: rural TN Posts: 615	Roberts Failed to Disclose Lobbyist Work Roberts Failed to Disclose Lobbyist Work - - - - - - - - - - - - August 04,2005 \| WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court nominee John Roberts has acknowledged he should have disclosed to a Senate committee that he worked as lobbyist for the cosmetics industry in 2001. In a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee late Wednesday, Roberts wrote that he neglected to reveal that work in response to the panel's questionnaire asking about his lobbying activities. Confirmation hearings begin Sept. 6. The work, which was on behalf of the Cosmetics, Toiletries and Fragrances Association, involved an effort to stave off a regulatory change involving sunscreen. Roberts, a lawyer in private practice at the time, suggested that he did not think of disclosing the information because the nature of the work -- in which he met with lawyers at the federal Office of Management and Budget and the Food and Drug Administration -- did not seem political. "My conversations with the government attorneys were focused on the prospect of litigation," Roberts said in a four-paragraph letter addressed to Vermont Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, the panel's ranking Democrat. "Consequently, the question about lobbying on the questionnaire did not trigger a memory of these meetings." Newsday first reported Wednesday that Roberts had done the lobbyist work, resulting in the suspension of stricter labeling rules for sunscreen.

08-04-2005, 08:34 PM	#5
tristan_D Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 7,865	if its from Bush it must be the worst. __________________ Increase your sales. Up to $4 per click.

08-04-2005, 10:15 AM	#3
SouthernGirl So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: rural TN Posts: 615	yes it is. rather convenient to forget working as a lobbyist until a major national publication prints indisputable proof. please.

08-04-2005, 10:24 AM	#4
ChefJeff Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Arizona Posts: 1,499	This guy is nothing more than a Bush lap dog. Maybe the worst choice for the SUPREME court.

08-04-2005, 10:50 PM	#6
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	the best part of this whole thing is how Bush says he wants a partisan effort and a fair deal and no politcal crap involved then he says "oh and don't ask us for any other papers on him." so he wants people to work with him, but not the reverse.