GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   A Question to Republicans (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=493412)

StuartD 07-18-2005 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
I have three educational words for you Stewie - Madalyn Murray O'Hair

While I am surprised that you can count that high, I am still unsure of what relevance that has to my post.

mardigras 07-18-2005 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
BTW I'm from NYC, so that blows your theory.

And I couldn't be deeper in the Bush lovin' Bible bastardising red stain on the map, so there goes his theory x 2 :upsidedow

cambaby 07-18-2005 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
You and your mullet please go back to shootin' rabbits and driven ur 4x4.
Let the rest of us adults talk.

BTW I'm from NYC, so that blows your theory.

http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/1...enter-game.gif

cambaby 07-18-2005 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
And I couldn't be deeper in the Bush lovin' Bible bastardising red stain on the map, so there goes his theory x 2 :upsidedow

Enemy mine.

mardigras 07-18-2005 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD
While I am surprised that you can count that high, I am still unsure of what relevance that has to my post.

I think he's trying to say, if you aren't with them, you are for the terro...er, I mean, athiests :1orglaugh

mardigras 07-18-2005 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Enemy mine.

:1orglaugh Ha, I'm a good southerner... I watch Fox News and listen to Rush, Hannity and O'Reilly regularly...
(although from a different perspective than my neighbors :winkwink:)

StuartD 07-18-2005 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
I think he's trying to say, if you aren't with them, you are for the terro...er, I mean, athiests :1orglaugh

Hahaha... ok, that makes sense, well... it doesn't, but sounds like what he'd be trying to say.

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby

I find your joke a little distasteful. Of course I was living 2 blocks away that day, and trying to get to my 6 month old son. Meanwhile you were pissed that Jerry Springer was interrupted for some "news story".

cambaby 07-18-2005 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
I find your joke a little distasteful. Of course I was living 2 blocks away that day, and trying to get to my 6 month old son. Meanwhile you were pissed that Jerry Springer was interrupted for some "news story".

Yes the episode of Springer was about parents who are not near thier 6 month old children during crisis. It was quite disturbing, there was this one guy who.... oh wait...

cambaby 07-18-2005 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD
Hahaha... ok, that makes sense, well... it doesn't, but sounds like what he'd be trying to say.

You are funny Stewie you remind me of a Little Eichmann

woj 07-18-2005 06:02 PM

50.........

cambaby 07-18-2005 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
:1orglaugh Ha, I'm a good southerner... I watch Fox News and listen to Rush, Hannity and O'Reilly regularly...
(although from a different perspective than my neighbors :winkwink:)

And you have a purdy mouth!

cambaby 07-18-2005 06:03 PM

Fuck you woj I hijacked this thread first :(

Bama 07-18-2005 06:21 PM

It's been said that the 9-11 attacks had been planned for years so one could argue that if Clinton hadn't been so busy getting his dick sucked and lying about it or spent years defending his actions during the WhiteWater investigations he might have taken notice of the proliferation of terrorist organizations..

One could argue alot of things but really, what's the point?

The side that lost always bitches about the side that won. America isn't a democracy - it's a republic - the people don't make the decisions - they elect the people who make the decisions

jonesy 07-18-2005 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
I read it last thursday, and am trying to find the article. It was buried at the bottom of the article. Both Cheney and Bush were questioned by the special prosecutor, not under oath of course.

It amazes me that none of the media question this.

becasue they would lose their jobs ...

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Yes the episode of Springer was about parents who are not near thier 6 month old children during crisis. It was quite disturbing, there was this one guy who.... oh wait...

Fuck you, you piece of shit. I lived 2 blocks south and my son was at his daycare 6 blocks north. I wouldn't expect you to understand, from reading your posts.

The feeling of not knowing if you were ever going to see your family again is something you could never understand. I won't even try.

Live in your little happy world, cuz i'm living in mine. I surround myself with lots of people exactly not like you.

SuckOnThis 07-18-2005 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bama
It's been said that the 9-11 attacks had been planned for years so one could argue that if Clinton hadn't been so busy getting his dick sucked and lying about it or spent years defending his actions during the WhiteWater investigations he might have taken notice of the proliferation of terrorist organizations..


Republicans demanded millions of dollars and govt resources focus on a blowjob, meanwhile Bin Laden was making plans to attack the country....you Republicans must be very proud of yourselves.

cambaby 07-18-2005 06:55 PM

So young. So angry. Must be that damn rap music.
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/08...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
So young. So angry. Must be that damn rap music.
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/08...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Heavy reading for you again I see.

gideongallery 07-18-2005 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
Clintons perjury didnt involve national security. Nor did Clintons lie cost 150,000 lives and $182,000,000,000 and counting.

your kidding right, to protect a secret about his affair he sent his mistress to the pentagon knowing full well she had a secret that could be used to blackmail her.

do you know how many people lives clinton put at risk just because he wanted to cover up his affair.

mardigras 07-18-2005 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bama
The side that lost always bitches about the side that won. America isn't a democracy - it's a republic - the people don't make the decisions - they elect the people who make the decisions

Some people act as if the election were like a sports championship where the team that may have only won by one point takes the trophy home and the other team goes home with nothing. Our representatives national and local are supposed to represent all us us, not just those that voted for them :2 cents:

For all the "mandate" the president may claim it's silly for anyone to suggest that 49% of the country should be ignored when discussing issues and/or passing legislations that affect all, and just as silly for anyone to think that that many people should not be vocal.

I don't support the nit-picky biting that goes on in a segment of the Democratic party but you better hope like hell that's not where a viable candidate comes from and that the Republicans can get away with using the screwy unverifiable voting machines to steal 2008 and beyond because it won't be pretty:winkwink: I think the prez & co. are losing their base primarily because of the total fuckup that is Iraq, but also because of the overall ass sideways priorities of this administration.

FunForOne 07-18-2005 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras

For all the "mandate" the president may claim it's silly for anyone to suggest that 49% of the country should be ignored when discussing issues and/or passing legislations that affect all, and just as silly for anyone to think that that many people should not be vocal.

I


its sillier for the loosing party to assume that 49% are in their party. What percentage of those 49% are liberals, socialists and communists? Its just a big pot of minority, who really knows which party deserves crumbs?

Think about the big anti republican players during the election:
John Kerry, Michael Moore, and George Sorros - Not all democrats are they?

cambaby 07-18-2005 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
I think the prez & co. are losing their base primarily because of the total fuckup that is Iraq, but also because of the overall ass sideways priorities of this administration.

Wishful thinking there sorry the GOP is not losing thier base if anything its becoming larger and stronger. Sorry the Democrats are the ones that are in serious trouble. Look there are other great alternatives to the GOP AND Democratic party. Libertarians, Independents, etc. You moderate liberals/socialists need to distance yourselves from Teddie and Co. they are killing your cause.

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery
your kidding right, to protect a secret about his affair he sent his mistress to the pentagon knowing full well she had a secret that could be used to blackmail her.

do you know how many people lives clinton put at risk just because he wanted to cover up his affair.

I am always amazed at the compartmentalization that conservatives use to justify their thinking.

How in the world is covering up an affair anywhere near the lies that were told to take us to war. You say Clinton put people at risk, hmmm last I heard 1700 kids aren't at risk, they are fucking dead and buried. If you think that the injured that are coming back just got bb gun wounds, maybe you should take a trip to the local VA hospital with me, the next time I go.

FunForOne 07-18-2005 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
I am always amazed at the compartmentalization that conservatives use to justify their thinking.

How in the world is covering up an affair anywhere near the lies that were told to take us to war. You say Clinton put people at risk, hmmm last I heard 1700 kids aren't at risk, they are fucking dead and buried. If you think that the injured that are coming back just got bb gun wounds, maybe you should take a trip to the local VA hospital with me, the next time I go.


Only Sandy Burgers underwear and socks knows if Clinton is negligently responsible for those civilians I saw jumping out of those towers because their skin was on fire.

cambaby 07-18-2005 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
How in the world is covering up an affair anywhere near the lies that were told to take us to war. You say Clinton put people at risk, hmmm last I heard 1700 kids aren't at risk, they are fucking dead and buried. If you think that the injured that are coming back just got bb gun wounds, maybe you should take a trip to the local VA hospital with me, the next time I go.

We went to war with Iraq in 1991, Saddam violated the cease fire many times, he also violated UNITED NATIONS(used to mean something) resolutions REPEATEDLY. Long range missle parts and plans were FOUND, not yet assembled WMD but still against UN resolutions. And those -kids- you talk about you fucksock, *I* fought in Iraq in 1991 and your KIND does not represent me so stop invoking my fucking name.

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Wishful thinking there sorry the GOP is not losing thier base if anything its becoming larger and stronger. Sorry the Democrats are the ones that are in serious trouble. Look there are other great alternatives to the GOP AND Democratic party. Libertarians, Independents, etc. You moderate liberals/socialists need to distance yourselves from Teddie and Co. they are killing your cause.

You would think that the republicans have been in power for 100 years the way you are talking. Do you actually think that you will be in power forever. History shows it's a pendulum and don't get hit by the big ball on the way back.

Last I heard there was a dem in charge for with 8 great years of an amazing economy, before the current pud put us in the depression we are in.

Bama 07-18-2005 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
Republicans demanded millions of dollars and govt resources focus on a blowjob, meanwhile Bin Laden was making plans to attack the country....you Republicans must be very proud of yourselves.

Sorry fella - but your guy had the big chair in the round room - the buck stops there regardless of what the Republicans were or weren't doing.

But - all I'm saying is that each party has it's own skeletons and we take turns bitching about each others when really - what's the point.

SuckOnThis 07-18-2005 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Wishful thinking there sorry the GOP is not losing thier base if anything its becoming larger and stronger. Sorry the Democrats are the ones that are in serious trouble. Look there are other great alternatives to the GOP AND Democratic party. Libertarians, Independents, etc. You moderate liberals/socialists need to distance yourselves from Teddie and Co. they are killing your cause.


Sure dumbass, thats why Bush's approval ratings are at 41% (taken BEFORE all this Rovegate), and 6 in 10 think the country is heading down the wrong track. Pull your fucking head out of Limbaughs ass.

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
We went to war with Iraq in 1991, Saddam violated the cease fire many times, he also violated UNITED NATIONS(used to mean something) resolutions REPEATEDLY. Long range missle parts and plans were FOUND, not yet assembled WMD but still against UN resolutions. And those -kids- you talk about you fucksock, *I* fought in Iraq in 1991 and your KIND does not represent me so stop invoking my fucking name.

Well then we probably know each other then, but wait you were behind me I guarantee that. Maybe I can talk for us both.

If you were really there, then you would know what the war was about. :winkwink:

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bama
Sorry fella - but your guy had the big chair in the round room - the buck stops there regardless of what the Republicans were or weren't doing.

But - all I'm saying is that each party has it's own skeletons and we take turns bitching about each others when really - what's the point.

If the buck stops at the big chair ...... guess who was sitting in it the day we got attacked. Oh that's right, he was sitting in a chair his size at a grade school.

cambaby 07-18-2005 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
Sure dumbass, thats why Bush's approval ratings are at 41% (taken BEFORE all this Rovegate), and 6 in 10 think the county is heading down the wrong track. Pull your fucking head out of Limbaughs ass.

Yes thats BUSHS approval ratings, of course all respondants were polled in large American cities where we KNOW the results wont be skewed.

Regardless of what people think of Bush the GOP is kicking your asses all up and down the country so suck it up, I mean thats what you are good at right? Sucking....

Bama 07-18-2005 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
Last I heard there was a dem in charge for with 8 great years of an amazing economy, before the current pud put us in the depression we are in.

Hmm... interesting analogy. Refresh my memory though.

Under who's watch was NAFTA signed in under that promoted US companies moving overseas to cheaper labor?

Bama 07-18-2005 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
If the buck stops at the big chair ...... guess who was sitting in it the day we got attacked. Oh that's right, he was sitting in a chair his size at a grade school.

Voyager, launched in 1977, reached Neptune in 1989

So who takes credit? The guy in charge when events began and set things in motion or the guys sitting in the chair when the final event happens?

FunForOne 07-18-2005 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
You would think that the republicans have been in power for 100 years the way you are talking. Do you actually think that you will be in power forever. History shows it's a pendulum and don't get hit by the big ball on the way back.

Last I heard there was a dem in charge for with 8 great years of an amazing economy, before the current pud put us in the depression we are in.


I stopped counting at 30 while counting the years the democrats have gone in presidental elections without getting a majority of the Americans to vote their party. Thats a hell of a cycle.

If is wasn't for Ross Perot, Hillary would speaking tomorrow at the chamber luncheon trying to get relected to city council in some small town in Arkansas.

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bama
Voyager, launched in 1977, reached Neptune in 1989

So who takes credit? The guy in charge when events began and set things in motion or the guys sitting in the chair when the final event happens?

Holy christ, will republicans take responsibility for anything? Shitty economy, a recession was already starting when Bush took office.( It's been 5 years now, what's your excuse)
9-11, fuck Clinton should have done something.(He tried on several occasions to get Bin Laden, but didn't broadcast it to scare the public.Told Bush his top priority should be getting him) Well...what is Bush doing to get him now?

I truely believe they don't want to get him. He's like their ace in the whole. Anytime something goes wrong, just play a tape and scare the shit out of the sheep.
Doesn't it seem strange to anybody that the last we heard from Bin Laden was a week before the election. Not a peep since. Rove is one smart fucker, he is.

gideongallery 07-18-2005 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
Sorry, but there are different degrees of lying. If your wife lies about how much something cost compared to lying about fucking someone its the same to you? Its obvious as hell Rove was doing nothing more than trying smear someone that found evidence that went against Bush's war chant, thats really what this is all about. And if you think this investigation is simply to find out who leaked something to a reporter you're dead wrong. This country was lead into war under false pretenses, I dream of the day Bush and his lackeys are brought to justice over this and hopefully the day is coming.

A single vial of antrax virus (1 inch) deep and a single dvd of documentation would allow sadam to turn all the medical facilities that were inspected by the UN inspectors into fully functional biological WMD facilities.


the report commissioned to investigate the war determined that there never was chemical WMD, or Nuclear WMD (because sadam did not have the facilities to produce them) but all they could say about biological WMD was that there were none at the time they searched.

If you really believe that Sadam did not have Biological WMD when the UN inspectors were trying to search his facilities, why the hell was he stopping/delaying them.

Don't you think if there was nothing to find he would have openly allowed the UN inspectors to go anywhere they wanted.

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
I stopped counting at 30 while counting the years the democrats have gone in presidental elections without getting a majority of the Americans to vote their party. Thats a hell of a cycle.

If is wasn't for Ross Perot, Hillary would speaking tomorrow at the chamber luncheon trying to get relected to city council in some small town in Arkansas.

4 year later....Bob Dole :1orglaugh

spanky part 2 07-18-2005 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery
A single vial of antrax virus (1 inch) deep and a single dvd of documentation would allow sadam to turn all the medical facilities that were inspected by the UN inspectors into fully functional biological WMD facilities.


the report commissioned to investigate the war determined that there never was chemical WMD, or Nuclear WMD (because sadam did not have the facilities to produce them) but all they could say about biological WMD was that there were none at the time they searched.

If you really believe that Sadam did not have Biological WMD when the UN inspectors were trying to search his facilities, why the hell was he stopping/delaying them.

Don't you think if there was nothing to find he would have openly allowed the UN inspectors to go anywhere they wanted.

Wow! A UN inspector and a chemist visiting gfy, who knew.

FunForOne 07-18-2005 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
(He tried on several occasions to get Bin Laden, but didn't broadcast it to scare the public.


Cant argue with facts!!!!! LOL



Clinton had been give recomendations on what to do to stop further terrorists attacks on US soil. (Yes, 9/11 wasn't the first)

We should hear all about how he enacted those recomendations as soon as Sandy Burger finishes preparing him by looking over some classified memos.

"Whoops, they fell in my underwear" - Burger
"We were all laughing about that" - Clinton


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123