![]() |
Quote:
|
ouch, someones gonna get canned
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let me know if you want to do a link trade. We are going to throw a shit-ton of traffic at this site. Let's learn from this, move on and make some money together. |
This highlights the trouble with outsourcing.
My former partner was filipino, lived here in Vegas and had a shop down in the Philippines in Angeles City. It was a short lived experiment that lasted about 6 months. While the quality of the work could be outstanding, copyright theft was always a concern, and a couple of times we caught it before it hit the client's eyes. Heads would roll. We went through a number of managers in a short amount of time, but for some reason they just didn't seem to care..they were so far away I guess they felt untouchable. I hate to denigrate an entire population or race, but at this point in my life I would not trust another project to be outsourced to the Philippines. It was just way too much of a hassle, and never worth the so called "savings," in cost. It cost us way much more to have to micro manage every fucking detail. Good luck with outsourcing for those of you who decide to do it. |
That is pretty crazy :(
|
I am pretty sure that Lens and Lars and the owners of the large companies do not review everysingle page that is made by one of their employees.
|
I am also pretty sure that you 'don't' just give ftp access to upload a whole site.
Hard to find skilled labor that can built a website, has knowledge about php and has a little bit more knowledge such as database. http://www.pornsavvy.com/review.php?reviews_id=216 Typical example of bad management, pointing to a local worker. As if that local worker is smart enough to surf around and find this exact site? Yeah right. Kuddos Rick. |
so they tell a designer they want a site similar to "site A" so the designer uses it to make "site B" and he forgets to pull out and change out some content. OOOPSS Shit! I mean if people didnt copy peoples sites therte would only be like 20 sites in the hole world. LOL
|
My name is Richard Dotson, and I am the project manager for the PornSavvy project, and the one ultimately responsible for this mistake.
When we started the development of the site, our programmer gathered avatars from the net to use for development only. This was to be for local testing, never for publication. There was an error in our backend preventing a new writer from uploading his correct avatar. This came to my attention late last week, and we finally corrected the bug the end of our shift on Friday. At that time the reviews by this writer had no avatar displayed. Unknown to me, the programmer did not have a copy of the writers avatar on his computer, and decided to put up one of the old development graphics as a temporary fix. Thus, now I am in a fix. The error has been corrected. My apologies to Rick, Marc and Rick M. for the trouble this caused. |
50.........
|
Quote:
I am most certain Rick will deal with this and learn from this. Somewhere management as failed him and they deserve what's coming. I was running one of the bigegst call center in Toronto many years ago for Sitel Corporation. We had clients like Visa, MC, Rogers, Bell Atlantic. And yes it happened that unfortunatly our client got hear before us or at same time about a night shift manager skimming on sales or cheating on sales pitch with sales rep. Of course we got blamed for it. That manager was employed by us. but we dealt quickly with the situation, cut a deal with client to make them happy and moved on to do lots more business. I am sure this will happen between Rick and Rick ;-) |
Quote:
Peace. p.s. changing that sig now, been meaning to do that. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
I had no doubt Rick would take of it:)Its a case you hire $300 a month designers, these arent great creative thinkers. I saw it with the mainstream company I worked for.
|
Quote:
However, you may want to re-word the following still: "Our team works hard to ensure fair and accurate reviews. To view their profile, click their respective icon." on http://www.pornsavvy.com/staff.php That's still verbatim from our homepage, and technically "clicking their icon" goes nowhere anyway. :Oh crap |
Quote:
|
pretty damned funny, the 'rogue employee' excuse pulled... but seriously, if there was a deal in the past that fell through concerning interest in the original site, i would think latona would have looked at his new site and immediately noticed content that was pirated from the site he was trying to duplicate / buy previously.
|
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
|
Goddamn, it's good to see Rick posting though.
Too bad on the subject matter. |
mmmmmm drama
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This has been standard for as long as I've been in the industry, and more. Ranks is Rick M, former owner from Ynot. When Ynot was the only board in town, this was standard practice. It not only publicy air the grievance, it also warns any one else doing business with either party. Thankfully this has reached a positive end, but posts like this have a use, and should always be considered. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In addition, I'm not just the guy giving orders or steering the ship. I design every page on thebestporn.com, and write all the text except for the reviews. You don't see me post on GFY much (i read a lot though) because it's so time consuming. So I take a lot of pride in our site, more than just coming up with the concepts. |
Quote:
Goof.... |
Quote:
surfers are gonna take the fucking time to watermark a fucking video their submitting to cj? :1orglaugh rogue surfers? :1orglaugh :321GFY |
Rick M. is one of the true pioneers of this industry and one of the most tactful business persons I know.
This was a good way to deal with it and it is the way it was done "in the good ol' days". Not only did it address Latona who came out and responded professionally as did his subordinate (generals always should be prepared to commit seppuku for their emporor) but Rick M's post also sent a message to all the other copycats looking to ride BestPorn's innovations. Kudos. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:thumbsup Just another hard day at the orifice, just doing my job. |
Quote:
I got moist too. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Man i had to call up dictionary.com for that one. lol Thanks for your support Far-L. I salute you samurai style!! http://www.ranks.com/images/samurai.jpg |
First, some words to those talking smack OTHER THAN RICK. Rick's got a right to be pissed and I'll address that in a second.
Jesus Christ on a pogo stick. Some people out there just love jumping on an anti-CJ thread any chance they get. If ANYONE has a beef with us it's not like we're hiding. This wimpy "oh yeah and they suck b/c of this too" stuff is just plain cowardly. [email protected]. 404-808-3187. ICQ - 64425641. I've you've got a problem, don't be a pussy. Call me. Now, to the problem at hand. ALL of you are missing one huge point: THIS SITE ISN'T LIVE YET!!! There is only one single link burried in a drop-down on the SickSiteNetwork.com navigation piece ONLY on CJ and it's ONLY been up since 7/3. It's just enough to send a trickle of traffic to it to test. If it was live and launched and had my seal of approval don't you think I might have posted something about it? Maybe put ads up for it on all my sites? Hmmm? Next. on the Rick Latona trashing. Get your facts straight. I handle everything to do with consumptionjunction.com, steakandcheese.com, freakhole.com, revengeworld.com, cjtraffic.com, pornsavvy.com and a few more sites coming down the pipe. Rick is NOT responsible for these sites so he's NOT responsible for this screw-up. I am. Finaly to the question at hand, I'm not blaming squat on a rogue employee. An employee was told to use "placeholders" till we FINISHED THE SITE which hasn't happened yet. Should that employee have gotten his placeholders from Rick M's site? Hell no. Would that have been caught before we launched? Hell yes. As for why he went over to Rick M's site it's probably because we took a long hard look at the site when we developed ours. Why not? He's got the best review site out there and we want to build one better. We also looked at Rabbits, AdultReviews, and SirRodney. Did we copy them? NO. Is our site different? Yes? Did any of you jack-off's accusing us of copying people bother to surf the site, sign-up, use it to know what you're talking about? No. I'm very proud of this site and how it's different. We have busted our ass to make it a place surfers will come to for reasons OTHER than just to find a review of a porn site. It's a major drawback to every review site out there and that's where we're different. We've got user-interactivity built thru the entire site. You can add any piece of content to your favorites list. You can comment on any peice of content. You can rate any piece of content. We've got a real-deal forum in which the actual writers of the reviews will interact with the visitors. We've got more video content than anyone - min of 3 clips per review. We've built in the ability for the surfers to come and just surf thru the video clips and the galleries like they do on CJ. Of course if they see a clip they're interested in they can click to read the full review or visit the site. Long and short, don't judge a site I've busted my ass on till I say it's ready to judge. I've already emailed w/ Rick M, made my apologies, made peace. If that's not good enough for anyone else I don't really give a flip. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123