Lawrence says, that it was a deliberate set up for him to fail.
No doubt about that.
The bunch who did it say, that he deserved it.
Maybe, maybe not, but regardless, it was a shitty thing to do to him.
So now that we all agree.
It's hard enough for male talent to perform anyway. I've shot the best, and been the talent, and no, I didn't always make the cut.
I've given the male talent the camera, said shoot POV, left them alone and later had a tape where he can't get it up, (just her and him alone) he sets the cam on the coffee table, eats her, and still cant get it up.
And when I come back in the room, get a speech about how this is all just wrong (LOL)
Funny cause it was his idea in the first place.
When they shot poor lawrence, the four chicks in the background, talking, and making comments, and one was a man hating lesbian bitch, and none of them had anything nice to say, and can you say harpies?
If, and I say IF, they had wanted him to perform, they would have shut up, and showed some gash, or at least some tit.
Ya set the poor guy up.
Male talent fails for a lot of reasons, but one rule is shut up on the set.
RJ? Those bitches in the background had a gabfest. You shot 41 pages of stills. Your female talent backed off everytime the guy got close to being good.
But ya claim this was fair.
Tell ya what, lets try this.
You set it up again, you can direct and shoot me trying, and you shoot what you want. Then, I get to put you in the same set, and direct, with Lawrence as my cameraman, and you perform on camera.
Lets see who wins.
You pick the talent, the set, the lights, whatever.
Ya game?
Ya wanna try?
The only rule is you have to put up with everything I have to put up with.
If ya wanna brag, that he did not deliver, that's one thing. Okay. But don't claim it was fair, or even close.
That's BS.
It was not fair, and if ya want to try doing it again, where fair is fair, lets go.
If not fine, but lay off Lawrence.
James
No doubt about that.
The bunch who did it say, that he deserved it.
Maybe, maybe not, but regardless, it was a shitty thing to do to him.
So now that we all agree.
It's hard enough for male talent to perform anyway. I've shot the best, and been the talent, and no, I didn't always make the cut.
I've given the male talent the camera, said shoot POV, left them alone and later had a tape where he can't get it up, (just her and him alone) he sets the cam on the coffee table, eats her, and still cant get it up.
And when I come back in the room, get a speech about how this is all just wrong (LOL)
Funny cause it was his idea in the first place.
When they shot poor lawrence, the four chicks in the background, talking, and making comments, and one was a man hating lesbian bitch, and none of them had anything nice to say, and can you say harpies?
If, and I say IF, they had wanted him to perform, they would have shut up, and showed some gash, or at least some tit.
Ya set the poor guy up.
Male talent fails for a lot of reasons, but one rule is shut up on the set.
RJ? Those bitches in the background had a gabfest. You shot 41 pages of stills. Your female talent backed off everytime the guy got close to being good.
But ya claim this was fair.
Tell ya what, lets try this.
You set it up again, you can direct and shoot me trying, and you shoot what you want. Then, I get to put you in the same set, and direct, with Lawrence as my cameraman, and you perform on camera.
Lets see who wins.
You pick the talent, the set, the lights, whatever.
Ya game?
Ya wanna try?
The only rule is you have to put up with everything I have to put up with.
If ya wanna brag, that he did not deliver, that's one thing. Okay. But don't claim it was fair, or even close.
That's BS.
It was not fair, and if ya want to try doing it again, where fair is fair, lets go.
If not fine, but lay off Lawrence.
James
~Accepting design works~ 
Comment