Illegal to connect to private but UNSECURE Wi-Fi signals?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Penthouse Tony
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2004
    • 5835

    #1

    Illegal to connect to private but UNSECURE Wi-Fi signals?

    Man Charged With Stealing Wi-Fi Signal

    Wed Jul 6, 8:15 PM ET

    Police have arrested a man for using someone else's wireless Internet network in one of the first criminal cases involving this fairly common practice.

    Benjamin Smith III, 41, faces a pretrial hearing this month following his April arrest on charges of unauthorized access to a computer network, a third-degree felony.

    Full article

    I didn't know that was illegal. If you don't want people on your network I figure you would secure it.
    aamos AT FFN dot com
    Penthouse.com Business Development
    ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

  • Thurbs
    The Thrilla in Manila
    • Sep 2004
    • 4785

    #2
    he'll get off if he didn't crack the WEP. open air signals aren't owned by the router owner, so if you decide not to be smart and leave ur new-fangled WiFi open to the public, it's public domain....

    of course if he had went on, gotten into the guys computer and started deleting shit, that could also be a malicious act viewed as a crime

    Comment

    • Penthouse Tony
      Confirmed User
      • Apr 2004
      • 5835

      #3
      Originally posted by SilverCash Thurbs
      he'll get off if he didn't crack the WEP. open air signals aren't owned by the router owner, so if you decide not to be smart and leave ur new-fangled WiFi open to the public, it's public domain....

      of course if he had went on, gotten into the guys computer and started deleting shit, that could also be a malicious act viewed as a crime
      I would agree that illegal acts while on a network not owned by others should still remain illegal. But from what's in the article it sounds like his only crime is sitting outside in a van using free internet.
      aamos AT FFN dot com
      Penthouse.com Business Development
      ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

      Comment

      • Juicy D. Links
        So Fucking Banned
        • Apr 2001
        • 122992

        #4
        Sagi may I interest you in some banking?

        Comment

        • StuartD
          Sofa King Band
          • Jul 2002
          • 29903

          #5
          I guess it'll all be in how they argue it. Realistically, the person is paying for the bandwidth and the "service" and for someone else to just jump on board and use it... well, that's "stealing" part of their service.

          But at the same time, as said... unsecured airwaves are free to anyone who can put them to use.
          This is me on facebook
          This is me on twitter

          Comment

          • Peaches
            Old broad
            • Oct 2002
            • 13933

            #6
            Just like it's still illegal to steal a car even if the keys are in it

            Comment

            • Penthouse Tony
              Confirmed User
              • Apr 2004
              • 5835

              #7
              Originally posted by Juicy D. Links
              Sagi may I interest you in some banking?

              I'm scared to find out what the withdrawal process is like.
              aamos AT FFN dot com
              Penthouse.com Business Development
              ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

              Comment

              • Fred Quimby
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2004
                • 5430

                #8
                Originally posted by Peaches
                Just like it's still illegal to steal a car even if the keys are in it
                Since When?

                Comment

                • jacked
                  sperm tail
                  • May 2004
                  • 11019

                  #9
                  as long as you don't crack the WEP key your good to go


                  This is exactly what an unconfigured and unsecured Wi-Fi network does: it transmits readily accessible signals. The ECPA therefore makes it not unlawful to intercept or access this information (note that the term ?intentional interception? is used in the act).

                  http://www.usiia.org/legis/ecpa.html
                  Got Cam Models?
                  icq: 361-607-616

                  Comment

                  • Penthouse Tony
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 5835

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Peaches
                    Just like it's still illegal to steal a car even if the keys are in it
                    I argue there is difference. If you steal a car you are taking ownership and use away from the owner. If you are on someone else's Wi-Fi you are making use of it.
                    aamos AT FFN dot com
                    Penthouse.com Business Development
                    ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

                    Comment

                    • JFK
                      FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 67373

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sagi_AFF
                      I'm scared to find out what the withdrawal process is like.
                      its the "Deposits" you have to worry about

                      FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                      For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                      Comment

                      • directfiesta
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 30135

                        #12
                        I got busted for watching a TV in my neighboors living room while walking on the sidewalk ...
                        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                        Comment

                        • Peaches
                          Old broad
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 13933

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Sagi_AFF
                          I argue there is difference. If you steal a car you are taking ownership and use away from the owner. If you are on someone else's Wi-Fi you are making use of it.
                          Good point. It will be interesting to see how the courts settle this.

                          Comment

                          • Xenophage
                            Registered User
                            • Oct 2001
                            • 12122

                            #14
                            this guy is fucked.. its part of the Patriot Act...hacking into a network if they wanna throw the book at him he could get 20+ years

                            he can get more for doing this than killing someone

                            Comment

                            • Penthouse Tony
                              Confirmed User
                              • Apr 2004
                              • 5835

                              #15
                              Originally posted by LegendaryLars
                              this guy is fucked.. its part of the Patriot Act...hacking into a network if they wanna throw the book at him he could get 20+ years

                              he can get more for doing this than killing someone
                              WOW, that's scary to think that the government would consider that hacking. Means every student that brings a laptop to Starbucks is a hacker. Arrest those HIPPIES!
                              aamos AT FFN dot com
                              Penthouse.com Business Development
                              ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

                              Comment

                              • StuartD
                                Sofa King Band
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 29903

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Sagi_AFF
                                WOW, that's scary to think that the government would consider that hacking. Means every student that brings a laptop to Starbucks is a hacker. Arrest those HIPPIES!
                                ah, but starbucks would have a public service... you yourself said in the thread title that it was a private network that was accessed.
                                This is me on facebook
                                This is me on twitter

                                Comment

                                • Penthouse Tony
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Apr 2004
                                  • 5835

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by JFK
                                  its the "Deposits" you have to worry about
                                  I don't want my money in good hands.
                                  aamos AT FFN dot com
                                  Penthouse.com Business Development
                                  ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

                                  Comment

                                  • azguy
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2004
                                    • 5167

                                    #18
                                    It's legal to scan for open networks, but illegal to actually use them...

                                    Comment

                                    • Penthouse Tony
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Apr 2004
                                      • 5835

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by NichePay - StuartD
                                      ah, but starbucks would have a public service... you yourself said in the thread title that it was a private network that was accessed.
                                      Right it turned out to be a private network. But how would you know it was private or public? I would just assume that if you want it to be private you secure it. What if someone lives next door to a starbucks and people get confused and connected to the private network instead of Starbucks' network? Also what if you have a Wi-Fi card that just connects on it's own to the strongest available network?
                                      aamos AT FFN dot com
                                      Penthouse.com Business Development
                                      ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

                                      Comment

                                      • jacked
                                        sperm tail
                                        • May 2004
                                        • 11019

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by NichePay - StuartD
                                        ah, but starbucks would have a public service... you yourself said in the thread title that it was a private network that was accessed.

                                        how is it a private network when the signal is open for anyone to publicly access, theirs no breaking into the network your connecting to an open frequency, it you broke the WEP key and then connected to the network that would be considered breaking into a private network
                                        Got Cam Models?
                                        icq: 361-607-616

                                        Comment

                                        • Thee Johnclave
                                          The Billz Collectaz
                                          • Nov 2001
                                          • 632

                                          #21
                                          Sitting at my desk right now I could connect to three wireless networks only one secure. As some have stated, how do I know which is private and which isn't but ignorance isn't a defense.

                                          Plus....I'm not sitting in a van outside someones house. That was awfully blatant.

                                          PS. to the Fed's, I'm using a cable modem.



                                          Seeking large traffic deals.

                                          john at pptme dot com

                                          Comment

                                          Working...