50......,.

Hey baddog, can you explain what you mean by 'laundering traffic'?

well im sure someone working for you could def increase the amount actually working the program .. thats a choice for all program owners to make and no im not putting myself forward its just an opinion

You're doing an excellent job Andrej

Ever used NATS or Executive Stats? If you don't have time checking new affiliates / affiliates with first signups you probably should change the business :winkwink:

An alternative to T3 Report:

http://www.google.com/search?q=link%...en-US:official

http://www.rustybrick.com/link_analysis.php

But all of it isn't very useful if the traffic originates from TGPs or CJs with trading scripts.

Sure. It is a major cause of chargebacks.

Say you own www.sponsorprogram.com that is a teen site.

You have an affiliate that is promoting you via www.hissite.com Everything looks nice on his site, and he makes a lot of signups, but gets an inordinate number of chargebacks, or trials that never convert.

It could be that said affiliate also owns www.launderingsite.com and on that site they are targeting pedos by saying things like, "go to www.hissite.com, and click the link to www.sponsorprogram.com where you will find all the KP content. Once you are a member you will find what you desire on page 10."

That is just one example, I am sure you can build your own scenarios from there.

The point is that www.sponsorprogram.com does not have what is being promised to the surfer, but the owner doesn't have any way of knowing this because www.launderingsite.com is not linked to him, and there is nothing on www.hissite.com to tip them off that there might be a problem.

Another scenario might be that on www.launderingsite.com they are telling the surfer to go to www.hissite.com and sign up to www.sponsorprogram.com but be sure to cancel the trial right away, and they can get access to www.sponsorprogram.com and 10 other sites for free.

I would think it totally depends on what % of that number actually send QUALITY converting traffic.

Okay, first off, it is apparent that you do not understand, or just have not visited T3Report.

Allow me to explain.

#1 While I like NATS a lot, it is only going to tell you where your sales are coming from. I think all program owners already know this. T3Report. will give you all of your linking relationships, not just the ones sending you traffic and/or sales.

#2. You have suggested using Google. There are a couple problems with this. The first being that Google will only give you the first 1,000 results, and they do not verify their links. T3Report. gives you all the links, and verifies then before sending you your monthly report.

Let's use Google to see how many links they show for sleazydream.com - Results 1 - 10 of about 59 linking to www.sleazydream.com - I think we both know that isn't right.

Let's see what T3Report finds: 602 unique domains, 23,566 backlinks, and 1,117 external links, and that was just what was found as of three months ago.

Now, besides showing all the backlinks, T3Report will show you all of the sites linked to them (thus the 3 - Starting URL, those linking to that URL, and those linking to them) as well as the linking relationship (if any) between level 1 and 3.

Now, take into consideration that you get an updated report every month for a year, all for just $349. Does your time have any value at all? Would you rather spend your time trying to track down all these affiliates, or would you rather use the time helping them promote your program?

Ah got it, thanks. Scammers... :disgust

Let's see what yahoo finds http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=lin...b-t&fl=0&x=wrt

Who else would launder?

okay, so now how do you find where those sites get their traffic? and even if Yahoo has 41,000 results, they are only going to show you the first 1,000. T3Report verifies, and shows them all

Here is the original T3Report that was done on my AVS system when the T3Report first came out.

You never did answer my question as to whether or not your time had any value, so I am going to presume it doesn't if you think you can research 1,000 URL's and not use $349 worth or your time.

I would be remiss in not pointing out that as I stated, the results I gave you were from 3 months ago. The subscription to T3Report is for a year, with an updated report coming every month. The spiders keep finding new sites, and Yahoo has been around a little longer than T3Report has been spidering SleazyDream.com

I just need to know the number of results.

For those who need that kind of research it's worth the money, my research needs are a bit different.

Btw. :winkwink:

#1. I have no idea why you think the number of results is important, that isn't going to help a program owner much.

As far as your second comment, it only shows you how inadequate the tool you are using is, when you consider that there are about 9,000 individual sites that have links to Sex Pictures Pass via login boxes.

For TGPs / CJs you check the trades, for linklists and general sites you check number of backlinks, for SEOs you check the number of indexed sites, backlinks, PR related informations and search results.

To see if a site is actually etablished.

This is only google pagerank related, I don't care about login boxes.

Again, your time has no value. Mine does, so if I don't respond to you for a while, I am sure you will understand.

nice numbers andrej :thumbsup

Damn good thing I am wearing boots.

You got something nice going there keep up the good work.

My research actually helps me more than looking at quite abstract linking informations and doesn't really take much longer.

Yes my time has no value but your time has enough value to make 27,746 posts :winkwink:

Man, this turned out to be a GREAT thread!

Wow you have 400 active affiliates of which 60% send more than 10 sales each per day thats over 2400 joins a day assuming you get around $10 per sale thats $24,000 per day $720,000 per month.

You are the biggest sponsor there is.... :thumbsup

He didn't say 10 sales...:)
10 clicks...

:Oh crap So hes the smallest sponsor there is... :thumbsup

thumbs up andrej !
keep good work ! :winkwink:

we all know you can do that !

you would be surprised :winkwink:

thanks :)

..and a sponsor with 2400 daily sales is far from beeing the number 1

Stop assuming things please.

Thank you :thumbsup

I know the owners of this board I used to advertised there - anyway russian guys are good working people for me - never had any single problem with russians and I am pretty far from telling the same about US - Lot of scam webmasters from US and none from Russian.

Im sure there is smaller :upsidedow

great program and great sites you guys have

looks liek we have some drama here...

I have to agree

I know how much he make monthly..paypal me $1000 and I tell you ;)

lol...looks like you posted in the wrong thread... :error

Sounds quite nice

according to me 30-40% isn't a bad number, make a program announcment on GFY and see the webmasters signing up, lots will only signup to take a look or to start sending you traffic later. Few will push you hard and start making you money and few will send a few hits making the occasional signup.

You are doing pretty good I think, but it also despends on what your topaffiliates are doing ofcourse, 30-40% all sending only a few hits daily won't take you anywhere but you know that allready ;)))

even with your 1k affilates you proably do most joins inhouse?

I'd like to ask a different question: How many BW do you burn? How many hits do you get daily to your paysite?

not really, most of my sales are from affiliates, my gallery or other spots and some SE placements are only a nice bonus :)

do not send money to this guy :1orglaugh

Hook me up with a pass yo.

I just want to masturbate tbh.

juicy hahahahahahahaha=@hahahahahahahahahahahaha= nymalegigolos.com

paysites, not paysite :) but Im not going to tell, sorry :)

check your email, dont blow the server :)

Well, until I can afford such a great designer, Im doing good, yeah. :)

You're not mistaken... The same owners. :)

nice i guess you are doing more joins then i thought