150..........

i think you suffer from some delusional fantasy of self importance. i dont want to change your opinion. again, i was pointing out that you are presenting opinion as fact and your arguments are weak at best. if you were so "right" - then people would be lined up at scientology centers and they would not rely on cornering, harrassing and even abducting people. they would encourge questioning everything rather than labeling those who doubt as enemies of the church (SP's).

when someone cannot tolerate questions about their beliefs... i would have to question their beleifs.

here's the video of the interview.

http://video.msn.com/video/p.htm?t=1...e2d9b49c7b&rf=

I personally think he did great.

fletch

never said i disagreed with you that people can be psychosomatic- i disagree with you that the commom cold is a result of psychosomatics, which any scientist would concur with me.

that article doesnt support your claim as you think it does. it does not say that the common cold is in itself psychosomatic, it says people who typically report experiencing negative emotions are at greater risk for disease and those who typically report positive emotions are at less risk.

and so because you found one or a few articles on the internet to back up your scientology views its gospel? (shit bad word to use when speaking with an anti christian) and thats makes you an expert or its the truth? your backing your opinion with others opnions on study that isnt based on pure science but opinions of Psychologists which scientolgy abhors.

there are no facts only intepretations. and that goes for science too.

and me having a different opinion or disagreeing or challengeing your claims makes me uneducated?

maybe ive read up on the subject and disagree because of what ive read challenges your opinion?

and you call me an idiot?

:1orglaugh

fletch

never said i disagreed with you that people can be psychosomatic- i disagree with you that the commom cold is a result of psychosomatics, which any scientist would concur with me.

that article doesnt support your claim as you think it does. it does not say that the common cold is in itself psychosomatic, it says people who typically report experiencing negative emotions are at greater risk for disease and those who typically report positive emotions are at less risk.

and so because you found one or a few articles on the internet to back up your scientology views its gospel? (shit bad word to use when speaking with an anti christian) and thats makes you an expert or its a Fact? your backing your opinion with others opnions on study that isnt based on pure science but opinions of Psychologists which scientolgy abhors.

there are no facts only intepretations. and that goes for science too.

and me having a different opinion or disagreeing or challengeing your claims makes me uneducated?

maybe ive read up on the subject and disagree because of what ive read challenges your opinion?

and you call me an idiot?

:1orglaugh

i didnt post this twice

WTF :1orglaugh

Agreed even though it's not that black and white but people tends to use them like that, it can fix some conditions but if there's a cause to the rpoblem in your life, drugs sure aint the cure!

btw. Scientology sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup