Dildo in mouth - sexually explicit?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeppe
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 951

    #1

    Dildo in mouth - sexually explicit?

    I normally would consider this a stupid question myself, but you never know with thess fucked up US laws.

    Is a otherwise non-explicit image of a woman with a dildo in her mouth, sexually explicit and subject to 2257?
    AdultReviews.com
    PornReviews.com
    Submit your site for review here
  • After Shock Media
    It's coming look busy
    • Mar 2001
    • 35299

    #2
    Standard back massager model, or we talking woh boy ridem cowgirl type?

    Ahh actually it really doesnt matter. Answer is could be. Fuck a damn lollipop could be considered sexually explicit by the wrong crowd.

    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

    Comment

    • VegasSEGirl
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2004
      • 267

      #3
      It depends on if in that shoot/set she used the dildo to masturbate. You can't really take the first picture in an explicit set and use it even though the picture is non explicit.


      Make money with an amateur who is actually HOT and SMART!

      Comment

      • DutchTeenCash
        I like Dutch Girls
        • Feb 2003
        • 21684

        #4
        explicit.

        had a banner for strawberrysandy uploaded it to ccbill 10cc form and it got declined. No suckie on whatsoever. At least for ccbill...

        ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash
        bob AT dutchteencash DOT com
        ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

        Comment

        • Jeppe
          Confirmed User
          • May 2002
          • 951

          #5
          Originally posted by VegasSEGirl
          It depends on if in that shoot/set she used the dildo to masturbate. You can't really take the first picture in an explicit set and use it even though the picture is non explicit.
          Seriously? How can sponsors then provide free content?
          That is not definitely not how I understood the new regulations.
          AdultReviews.com
          PornReviews.com
          Submit your site for review here

          Comment

          • Jeppe
            Confirmed User
            • May 2002
            • 951

            #6
            Originally posted by After Shock Media
            Standard back massager model, or we talking woh boy ridem cowgirl type?

            Ahh actually it really doesnt matter. Answer is could be. Fuck a damn lollipop could be considered sexually explicit by the wrong crowd.
            I was thinking of this kind of pics
            I am going through all our galleries and deleting explicit pictures right now...
            AdultReviews.com
            PornReviews.com
            Submit your site for review here

            Comment

            • Jeppe
              Confirmed User
              • May 2002
              • 951

              #7
              Originally posted by thinkx
              explicit.

              had a banner for strawberrysandy uploaded it to ccbill 10cc form and it got declined. No suckie on whatsoever. At least for ccbill...
              Fuck
              AdultReviews.com
              PornReviews.com
              Submit your site for review here

              Comment

              • New Hope
                Registered User
                • May 2005
                • 15

                #8
                this may be the most stupiderest thread ever.

                Comment

                • After Shock Media
                  It's coming look busy
                  • Mar 2001
                  • 35299

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Jeppe
                  Fuck
                  Do not interpret what ccbill allows to what the law allows. CCbill would be and should be just playing it very safe.

                  [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • stev0
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 6801

                    #10
                    Originally posted by VegasSEGirl
                    It depends on if in that shoot/set she used the dildo to masturbate. You can't really take the first picture in an explicit set and use it even though the picture is non explicit.
                    Of course you can.... the law applies to each individual photo, not a specific set.

                    Comment

                    • Jeppe
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2002
                      • 951

                      #11
                      Originally posted by New Hope
                      this may be the most stupiderest thread ever.
                      Sorry you wasted one of your precious posts on it then...
                      AdultReviews.com
                      PornReviews.com
                      Submit your site for review here

                      Comment

                      Working...