![]() |
50.........,.
|
woj?....
ha ha.... right on cue. :D. |
Seriously....
What people actually need to do is stop listening to ANYBODY, you, him, they, ANYBODY.... and just read the regs and do what's best for their own business and quit fucking worrying about what others are doing or not doing about their business. And hopefully people aren't as stupid as some here might think, that they would buy hook, line and sinker into what xxxjay or anyone scoffing at 2257 is saying, and follow along like mindless sheep. But if they are that's their affair. I, however, tend to believe that in the end most people will base their decisions on what is best for their business and on facts derived from the regs themselves and from the advice of their lawyers, not what characters on message boards are saying. Give people some credit. :D |
This is getting so fucking old.......we are doing EXACTLY what our attorney has recommended we do......What more do you guys want for chrissakes!!!
If you think Jay is a prick, well thats a whole seperate issue for you and Jay to deal with. In the meantime.....let me reiterate...WE HAVE ACCESS TO ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS AT OUR PRIMARY PRODUCER EVASIVE ANGLES....WE ARE A SECONDARY PRODUCER AND OUR LEGAL COUNSEL HAS ADVISED US NOT TO WORRY ABOUT KEEPING THE DOCS ON HAND....RATHER ALL OUR 2257 ON OUR SITES FHG'S ETC POINT TO THE PRIMARY PRODUCER EVASIVE ANGLES. THE INJUNCTION WILL BE GRANTED AND ONE OF THE PARTS IT COVERS IS SECONDARY PRODUCERS. EVERYONE PLEASE CHILL THE FUCK OUT!!!! |
Wag the dog...
Here is what everyone should be paying attention to: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=481769 But obviously no one has the fucken balls to ask questions. |
Quote:
So, what should I do? A. Pay a decent chunk of change to get the legal councel of a one of the best 2257 attorneys there is -- then ignore his advice. B. Listen to Lenny2 from GFY. I'm going with A. The only thing I posted was the text to this article: http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9162 I didn't say anything about the injunction already being in place, I just stated it had been filed, and it happened just like I was told it would weeks ago. And Lenny2, if you want to call me a dick, why don't you come to Flodida in August and say it to my face? I'm not a dentist, so I don't remember how many teeth a person has, but you will leave with about 3 of them. I hate GFY wannabe armchair lawyers. |
Quote:
For those of you that do not know the difference, you really should get a lawyer or get out of the business. :2 cents: |
Quote:
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup |
Quote:
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9162 Either... A. Lenny2 can't read. B. He is putting words in my mouth. Either way, he will only have 3 teeth in his mouth (as I stated above) unless he issues and apology. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Lenny, too hardcore with your original post, though the message was correct. No one should alter their 2257 prep simply because an application for an injuction was filed. Emphasis on FILED. Not GRANTED. FILED. Jay however shouldn't be shot for being a messenger, he's simply relaying information from his attorney. It's up to each one of us to decide whether or not to follow. I'm glad he's posting, I don't mind how he packages it because I'm not a sheep and will decide for myself what path I pursue. |
Quote:
Damn...that's fuck up! |
Some people just have a very hard time dealing with the fact that the opinions and actions of many others are not, repeat: NOT going to fall in line with theirs. Officer Lenny happens to be one of those people.
And... does anyone really bust anyone else's teeth out EVER over these little board pissings? I have yet to see (or hear of) it. :D |
Quote:
|
bump for being so fucking funny and
Just do the 2257 - follow the law and keep making money |
Quote:
Keep in mind that IF an injunction is granted, it will ONLY cover FSC members Folks be putting a lot of false hopes and denial into this situation :2 cents: |
Quote:
There's a very big difference between and injunction and a lawsuit....all that has been filed is a lawsuit. Your thread title was leading people to believe that the judge has already issued an injunction, which he hasn't. You then went further and told people to stop worrying about 2257 and get back to work. You're misleading people on a very serious issue that could cost them 5 years in jail. That makes you a dick. |
I think you're both good shits, too bad the fascist government had to come between you.
Look on the bright side, the apocalypse can't be too far away so we won't have to worry about this shit for very long. When all the evangelicals get taken up to heaven we'll have free rein! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you want to worry yourself to death abo...you know what, fuck you - I just want to pop you in the fucking mouth - you can have your opinion, I will have mine - but, if you want to start name calling and slander about the shit FUCK YOU! I'LL BEAT YOUR FUCKING ASS YOU FUCKING FAG! I think an apology is in order. |
Quote:
After the sheep fucking thread I'd say we can call it even on the name callilng. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:321GFY |
Quote:
|
drama!
5678 |
Quote:
Is that the best you can do man? You're really pathetic, first you threaten me with physical violence and then you want to make fun of my content. We have ALL the docs for ALL of our content, most of it is produced exclusively for us so of course we have all the 2257 docs. Alot more than I can say for your program dickhead. :321GFY |
Quote:
All I have to do is drive over the hill to TTBoy's office and grab the model releases and send them to our corporate office in Vegas by the 23rd. We have every episode cross-referenced with the performers already. Despite our press release, we?ve spent plenty of time preparing for this eventuality. This is a big reason why I am not worried. First time I consulted a lawyer was last August when the proposed regulations were published. Furthermore, I didn't know being optimistic was a crime, a reason for verbal abuse or slander on public boards. If you read this article really points out how weak the government?s case really is: http://www.avnonline.com/articles/231124.html Most of this article is more of a refresher for me than it will be for a newb like yourself. Taking my point further, you started this shit. You attacked first -- Pearl Harbor style. All I said was that an injunction had been "filed" -- notice I did not say "granted", then you take stuff out of multiple posts, completely misquote me, use my words out of context, and then have the unmitigated audacity to make a post calling me a ?dick? and an ?idiot? in the title -- which now you have also called a lot of my business associates ?dicks? and ?idiots? by association. Good move ? you ought to get a ton of new affiliates out of that one. Lastly, seeing as you have gone to such great lengths to try and make me look bad ? yes, that is grounds for an ass-beating. Don?t think I haven?t done this before. You don?t know who I?ve worked for and what I?ve done in the past. I?m one of the few that have taken this offline shit to the street ? so -- post away, you pathetic keyboard jockey?you are only shoveling your own grave. :321GFY |
You two fight like sisters.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Damn late as always...... :Oh crap
|
Quote:
http://www.4freepornmovies.com/occash/cock.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fus...20050528162349 http://g.myspace.com/00047/37/64/47634673_l.jpg |
this will surely spice up my Saturday
:smokin |
:)
Quote:
|
who the hell brought this shit back?
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123