GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Republicans want to change constitution to allow Bush to run again (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=480793)

directfiesta 06-14-2005 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
What an ignorant foreign piece of trash you are.

Better than shit ... tough it has it's uses ... drunkieBoy...

http://www.webdejob.com/images/bushpooflag.jpg

BTW, any news on Bin Laden and the WMD ?????

Joesho 06-14-2005 01:16 PM

I hope it passes, cause then Bill would come back and set the country right again.....

detoxed 06-14-2005 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/319395.shtml

Republicans have officially started the the campaign to amend the Constitution by repealing the 22nd Amendment - the one that confines the President to two terms. If the Republicans hold their current strength, or increase it, in the 2006 Congressional elections, expect this measure to pass allowing Bush to remain President...
Republicans have officially started the the campaign to amend the Constitution by repealing the 22nd Amendment - the one that confines the President to two terms. If the Republicans hold their current strength, or increase it, in the 2006 Congressional elections, expect this measure to pass allowing Bush to remain President...

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.J.RES.24.IH: (Notice this is on the Library of Congress server, where the current Congressional record is maintained)

Evenif they took away the amendment, the american people would not elect him to a third term and most likely the sitting president would not be eligible for any changes made to the laws while he is president.

kane 06-14-2005 01:19 PM

This will never happen. No matter what they want to say or want you to belive there is already starting to be a backlash against the conservative republicans in this country. Only about 30% of the people think congress is doing a good job and bush's ratings are at an all time low. I won't be surprised to see the repubs lose some seats in the upcoming congressional elections next year. Even many repubs ( the more center and left leaning repubs ) are starting to speak out against the conservative movement. This bill and talk of this is just flexing. Even if they could get it through congress it would never pass all the states and even if it did, bush would already be out of office. I doubt he could win another term even he was allowed to run.

I'm not a democrat, nor a republican. I'm a registered independent that is more like a libertarian. I just like politics and seeing how things go.

Drake 06-14-2005 01:35 PM

I'm curious as to why they would start a campaign to amend it if they thought it would be impossible for it to pass. What would be the point or reasoning behind it?

SuckOnThis 06-14-2005 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33
I'm curious as to why they would start a campaign to amend it if they thought it would be impossible for it to pass. What would be the point or reasoning behind it?

Exactly, maybe they have an ace in the hole or its shortsided and weak but either way it goes to show they will stop at nothing to stay in power. Could you imagine if the dems tried this in Clintons last term? The media would be all over it.

mardigras 06-14-2005 02:01 PM

Do a search on "HJ 24 IH" (with quotes), the official name of this supposed bill. Only about 5 hits each currently in Google Web and Google Groups. Google News however returns nothing...

Fukeneh 06-14-2005 02:08 PM

it wont happen.... if it does, i will give my country back its fucking passport and citizenship.

Downtime 06-14-2005 02:09 PM

i'd proudly vote for him again

Probono 06-14-2005 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
Do a search on "HJ 24 IH" (with quotes), the official name of this supposed bill. Only about 5 hits each currently in Google Web and Google Groups. Google News however returns nothing...

The bill is real, this from the Library of Congress, here are the sponsors



http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquer...9:HJ00024:@@@P

Probono 06-14-2005 02:15 PM

The bill was introduced by a Democrat?

Biography of Congressman Steny Hoyer

Congressman Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland's Fifth Congressional District is now serving his second term as the House Democratic Whip, the second-ranking position among House Democrats. Congressman Hoyer was unanimously elected by his colleagues in the Democratic Caucus to serve in this leadership position, in which Hoyer is charged with building unity among House Democrats and delivering the Democratic Party's message.

Congressman Hoyer's service as Whip makes him the highest-ranking Member of Congress from Maryland in history. Now serving his 13th term in Congress, he also is the longest-serving Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Southern Maryland in history.

Congressman Hoyer's experience, know-how and strong work ethic have led to increasing responsibilities within the House Democratic leadership. He served as Chair of the Democratic Caucus, the fourth-ranking position among House Democrats, from 1989 to 1994. He is the former Co-Chair (and a current member) of the Democratic Steering Committee, served as the chief candidate recruiter for House Democrats from 1995 to 2000, and currently continues to actively recruit candidates around the country. He also served as Deputy Majority Whip from 1987 to 1989.

bringer 06-14-2005 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Probono
The bill was introduced by a Democrat?

:1orglaugh :thumbsup

mardigras 06-14-2005 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Probono
The bill is real, this from the Library of Congress, here are the sponsors



http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquer...9:HJ00024:@@@P

Oh I didn't doubt the validity of it, I was simply amazed at the amount of internet silence on it :eek7

vicki 06-14-2005 02:49 PM

snowballs chance in he**

bringer 06-14-2005 02:52 PM

bump for James Sensenbrenner, the only republican on it

Rep Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. (R) - COSPONSOR
Rep Hoyer, Steny (D) - SPONSOR
Rep Berman, Howard L. (D) - COSPONSOR
Rep Pallone, Frank, Jr. (D) - COSPONSOR
Rep Sabo, Martin Olav (D) - COSPONSOR

Rich 06-14-2005 03:04 PM

Some of you guys are talking like your votes actually count or that the current government cares about rules and the constitution. They have to have 3/4 of the states rectify the amendment? Is that right? Bullshit, if they want to do this they'll do it. They'll change it so only half the states have to approve or some shit. This may not even be meant for George Bush, this could be for Jeb.

Either way, the world will be a nuked-out wasteland before anyone with a last name other than Bu$h is President again. The funny thing is half the country has been manipulated into believing that's a good thing.

taibo 06-14-2005 03:06 PM

More trees. Less Bush.

topbizucksMark 06-14-2005 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen
if he's such a dim then why didnt someone knock him out of office for this new term?

50% of are population is borderline retarded, Guess we just wanted a real American in the white house

Doctor Dre 06-14-2005 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Considering it take YEARS for changes to the constitution to happen Bush would be out of office before the new rule went into effect. Anways what makes anyone think Bush wouldwina 3rd term if he could run? If American are that stupid I think it would be time to leave this country. Fact is if the election was held TODAY Kerry would win.

Voting machines my friend ... voting machines .

Scootermuze 06-14-2005 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33
I'm curious as to why they would start a campaign to amend it if they thought it would be impossible for it to pass. What would be the point or reasoning behind it?

Possibly to try to pull the same deal that was pulled with the 16th amendment...

It was never ratified, but a lie made it law and nothing was ever done about it..
The biggies know it was never ratified, but don't want to lose their perks .. with a few exceptions...

You can read about that one here..

kernelpanic 06-14-2005 03:19 PM

It will never happen

NTSS 06-14-2005 03:19 PM

That will never happen in a million years

kernelpanic 06-14-2005 03:19 PM

I'm a Republican and I won't vote for Bush again

GatorB 06-14-2005 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downtime
i'd proudly vote for him again

YOU should be shot if he could run again. Carbondale is but a 2 1/2 hour drive for me.

Rich 06-14-2005 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernelpanic
I'm a Republican and I won't vote for Bush again

Votes don't matter.

GatorB 06-14-2005 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre
Voting machines my friend ... voting machines .

What do voting machine have to do with anything? Do you not get how the Constitutional Amendment process works?

This bill would have to be passed by 2/3 vote in BOTH the House and Senate. That means about 30% of the Dems in the House and Senate would have to vote YES on this. That assuming that 100% of the Republicans would. Do you think Senators Bill First and John McCain who are both gunning to the Republican nomination in 2008 will vote yes on this?

Now if this bill somehow passed in Congress then 38 of the 50 state legistlators wil have to vote YES on this. Now the LEGISLATORS vote on this NOT the people. That means 13 states voting no kill this bill.

Not only that but if this bill isn't introdcued until 2006 then that means it would have to go thru all of this in about 2 years which would be near some kind of record for a constitional amendment.

NoCarrier 06-14-2005 03:45 PM

http://www.porn-sex-list.com/bush-dance.gif

NoCarrier 06-14-2005 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simple simon
never happen

http://www.antville.org/img/Resource...-head-sand.jpg

gideongallery 06-14-2005 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Machine
Obi Bill to the rescue.

that the main reason i don't see this happening, because if bush jr can run again so can slick willy.

mikeyddddd 06-14-2005 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen
if he's such a dim then why didnt someone knock him out of office for this new term?

Because there are a lot of people as stupid as him.

Barefootsies 06-14-2005 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/319395.shtml

Republicans have officially started the the campaign to amend the Constitution by repealing the 22nd Amendment - the one that confines the President to two terms. If the Republicans hold their current strength, or increase it, in the 2006 Congressional elections, expect this measure to pass allowing Bush to remain President...
Republicans have officially started the the campaign to amend the Constitution by repealing the 22nd Amendment - the one that confines the President to two terms. If the Republicans hold their current strength, or increase it, in the 2006 Congressional elections, expect this measure to pass allowing Bush to remain President...

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.J.RES.24.IH: (Notice this is on the Library of Congress server, where the current Congressional record is maintained)


HOWLING LAUGHTA

Will never happen.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

StickyGreen 06-14-2005 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
YOU should be shot if he could run again. Carbondale is but a 2 1/2 hour drive for me.

he should be shot for saying he would vote for someone? jesus christ...

stev0 06-14-2005 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen
if he's such a dim then why didnt someone knock him out of office for this new term?

That's what happens when bible thumpers get to vote...

DWB 06-14-2005 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
You have just violated federal law.

Assuming he is a US citizen.

Quickdraw 06-14-2005 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking
2/3's of the states and 2/3's of the congress have to ratify on an ammed. Dems will never go with it...

Well, supposedly that is the case :disgust

How about the 16th and 17th
http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/

StuartD 06-14-2005 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking
2/3's of the states and 2/3's of the congress have to ratify on an ammed. Dems will never go with it...

When you can't do things the normal way, you send planes into buildings and invade nations and terrorize your own country.

Hey, just because we think that something can't be done, doesn't mean it won't be.

Who'd a thunk that half of the stuff in the past 4 years would have happened???

Never underestimate what someone can do with the right level of power and connections.

bringer 06-14-2005 04:58 PM

great fucking thread
shows how many of you actually read beyond the topic

TaDoW 06-14-2005 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSaint
May I quote:

Godwin's law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Godwin's law (also Godwin's rule of Nazi analogies) is an adage in Internet culture that was originated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states that:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. In addition, it is considered poor form to invoke the law explicitly. Godwin's law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. Many people understand Godwin's law to mean this, although (as is clear from the statement of the law above) this is not the original formulation

ROFLMAO!!! that's the funniest shit I've heard in a long time

funny .. but true

mardigras 06-14-2005 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking
Dems will never go with it...

Dems would never go for approving 100% of Bush's judicial nominees... :1orglaugh ... :Oh crap

Drake 06-14-2005 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NichePay - StuartD
When you can't do things the normal way, you send planes into buildings and invade nations and terrorize your own country.

Hey, just because we think that something can't be done, doesn't mean it won't be.

Who'd a thunk that half of the stuff in the past 4 years would have happened???

Never underestimate what someone can do with the right level of power and connections.

Yeah all kinds of things happen that seem impossible. Heck just today a woman won her second $1 million lottery jackpot this year. The odds of her winning the lottery twice was 419 million-to-1.

http://www.ksat.com/irresistible/460...s=ant&psp=news

When things like that can happen it makes you wonder what other 'impossible' things can happen when people are actually able to influence the outcome.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123