Originally Posted by kahnx

and how about cartoon/hentai content? must be comply with 2257 ? :(

Originally Posted by 3piece chicken Dinner

Lenny once again I can't agree enough. After posting my comment above I got to thinking. There were really only 3-4 ways to do this.

Give out Id's
Not Give out Id's

Those two can be made sense of.

give out altered id's ie. BrainCash. I like it, don't know if it will work, but I liked it.

OR say Fuck 'em Like OC Cash- which oddly enough still made a bit of sense.

All of the companies thus far exhibited that they had ( or their counsel) an understanding for this law.

I just can not fathom how they came to this decision. the more I think the more I feel it was a way to give the green light to non-us affiliates. I'm afraid in the process they may be confusing the situation for an unsuspecting webmaster who will feel, the program said it's ok so it must be ok.

Originally Posted by xxxjay

Believe me guys - Topbucks is a top notch program. They went to their lawyer, laid things out, and he came back to them with a plan and they announced it. There is so much gray area here -- that is why the difference in opinions.

One thing Ali is 110% correct on is get yourself a lawyer and talk to him to see how 2257 really applies to you. This is something 95% of you guys haven't done and there are about 10 guys in the US that I feel are qualified to talk about this. Email me [email protected] and I will be happy to give you their names and numbers.

Originally Posted by garutch

I disagree with Rob that the statute that says "shall make available" means the primary producer must GIVE the records to the secondary producer. It simply does not say that.