.XXX article on Yahoo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GatorB
    The Demon & 12clicks
    • Oct 2001
    • 18208

    #1

    .XXX article on Yahoo

    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...et_pornography

    Some of the more interesting parts

    ICANN staff will now craft a contract with ICM Registry Inc., the Jupiter, Fla., company that made the bid. If the board and ultimately the U.S. Commerce Department approve it, ".xxx" names could appear in use by the year's end.

    Skeptics argue, however, that porn sites are likely to keep their existing ".com" storefronts, even as they set up shop in the new ".xxx" domain name. And that will reduce the effectiveness of software filters set up to simply block all ".xxx" names.

    The ".xxx" domain "legitimizes this group, and it gives false hope to parents," said Patrick Trueman, senior legal counsel at the Family Research Council and a former Justice Department official in charge of obscenity prosecutions.


    The adult entertainment industry is also hardly behind ".xxx" as a group. Many of its webmasters consider the domain "the first step toward driving the adult Internet into a ghetto very much like zoning laws have driven adult stores into the outskirts," said Mark Kernes, senior editor at the trade monthly Adult Video News.

    But given the limited effectiveness of a voluntary ".xxx" for filtering, Internet filtering expert Seth Finkelstein calls ".xxx" no more than a mechanism "to extract fees from bona fide pornographers and domain name speculators." (ICANN also gets an unspecified cut of each registration fee.)

    Anti-porn activist Donna Rice Hughes, however, remains unconvinced.

    "They are not going to give up their `.com' addresses," she said of porn sites. "It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure that one out."


    Amazing the stange bedfellows this thing is making.
  • Tom_PM
    Porn Meister
    • Feb 2005
    • 16443

    #2
    Yeah, I read that too. Was interesting point about CC processing maybe lighten up if the domain being processed for is on a .xxx. Although I'd believe it when I saw it.

    Also nice to see a push for ".kids" as I've been preaching about, lmao. Easier to just lock a childs browser to .kids ONLY than to try to filter off things.
    43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

    Comment

    • GatorB
      The Demon & 12clicks
      • Oct 2001
      • 18208

      #3
      Originally posted by PR_Tom
      Yeah, I read that too. Was interesting point about CC processing maybe lighten up if the domain being processed for is on a .xxx. Although I'd believe it when I saw it.
      Maybe if they give .XXX site a discount on transaction fess. More would use it.

      Also nice to see a push for ".kids" as I've been preaching about, lmao. Easier to just lock a childs browser to .kids ONLY than to try to filter off things.
      OH God forbid mainstream sites would have to switch I mean

      disney.kids
      cartoonnetwork.kids
      nick.kids
      pokemon.kids

      would be such a pain in the ass for them to switch.

      Comment

      • PornGeneral
        Confirmed User
        • Sep 2004
        • 564

        #4
        $60/domain or $6.99/domain

        Hmm which do you think webmasters will use?
        "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." -Patton
        "Only the dead have seen the end of war." -Plato

        Comment

        • ~Ray
          visit hardlinks.org
          • Jun 2003
          • 18361

          #5
          if we gave up our dot com's what would the activist put on pokemeinthecornholio.com ? links to the Catholic Church?

          ~Ray
          Adult Backlinks for Adult Websites - Testimonials Available

          Comment

          • Tom_PM
            Porn Meister
            • Feb 2005
            • 16443

            #6
            Originally posted by GatorB
            Maybe if they give .XXX site a discount on transaction fess. More would use it.



            OH God forbid mainstream sites would have to switch I mean

            disney.kids
            cartoonnetwork.kids
            nick.kids
            pokemon.kids

            would be such a pain in the ass for them to switch.
            lol yep it would be a pain for them to switch, but browsers could auto-preset to them for instant bonus on new bundled computers. And it also goes directly to the stated purpose of the zillion other attempts to "protect kids".
            43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

            Comment

            • clickhappy
              Confirmed User
              • Mar 2004
              • 4027

              #7
              Originally posted by PR_Tom
              Also nice to see a push for ".kids" as I've been preaching about, lmao. Easier to just lock a childs browser to .kids ONLY than to try to filter off things.
              That's what I say. I think its a fantastic idea to have a g rated section of the net for kids and families only.
              And there are tens of thousands of huge companies who would pour hundreds of millions of dollars to have a kids and parents only section of the internet.
              Its great PR for them.

              Toy companies, food companies, entertainment networks, diaper companies, magazine publishers, medicine companies, clothing companies, any family oriented companies, any company that wants parents as their customers.

              This effort would truly have an endless supply of cash.
              These big companies would be tripping over themselves to give money and get their name on this.
              having a .kids section of the net is a win win for everyone.

              Comment

              • clickhappy
                Confirmed User
                • Mar 2004
                • 4027

                #8
                double post

                Comment

                • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                  best designer on GFY
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 30307

                  #9
                  Woa...

                  "As envisioned, ICM would charge $60 for each of up to 500,000 names it expects to register, $10 of which would go to a nonprofit organization that would, among other things, educate parents about safe surfing for children."


                  http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,...tml?tw=rss.TOP

                  I like how they say that and not ASACP...

                  Comment

                  • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                    best designer on GFY
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 30307

                    #10
                    $60 x 500,00 = $30,000,000

                    Easy money.

                    Comment

                    • vicki
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 1478

                      #11
                      As envisioned, ICM would charge $60 for each of up to 500,000 names it expects to register, $10 of which would go to a nonprofit organization that would, among other things, educate parents about safe surfing for children.

                      The nonprofit, run by representatives of adult Web sites, free-speech, privacy and child-advocacy concerns, would determine registration eligibility.
                      what? ... the nonprofit group determines who is eligible to register?!?!
                      you've gotta be kidding me *shaking head* .. unbelievable
                      If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

                      HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
                      solid biz since 98
                      victoriakozub AT gmail.com
                      skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

                      Comment

                      • Kevsh
                        Confirmed User
                        • Dec 2004
                        • 8619

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PR_Tom
                        Also nice to see a push for ".kids" as I've been preaching about, lmao. Easier to just lock a childs browser to .kids ONLY than to try to filter off things.
                        Disallow:
                        *.*
                        Allow:
                        *.kids

                        Seems simple to me!

                        Comment

                        • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                          best designer on GFY
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 30307

                          #13
                          Originally posted by vicki
                          what? ... the nonprofit group determines who is eligible to register?!?!
                          you've gotta be kidding me *shaking head* .. unbelievable
                          Yes you read that right.



                          Soon none of you will mind a bar code on your arm.

                          You can still be a pimp.

                          Comment

                          • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                            best designer on GFY
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 30307

                            #14
                            Is that to depressing?

                            Comment

                            • vicki
                              Confirmed User
                              • Feb 2002
                              • 1478

                              #15
                              so its not a question of who registers first anymore .. its who gets 'approved'??
                              If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

                              HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
                              solid biz since 98
                              victoriakozub AT gmail.com
                              skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

                              Comment

                              • polish_aristocrat
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 40377

                                #16
                                Originally posted by GatorB
                                . If the board and ultimately the U.S. Commerce Department approve it,.
                                IMO the commerce department will approve it for sure
                                I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                Comment

                                • Babagirls
                                  Text Writer
                                  • Feb 2001
                                  • 18812

                                  #17
                                  it would make more sense to allow ONLY .kids sites rather than filter out EVERY domain except .kids & make us switch to .xxx




                                  Need a Text Writer?
                                  Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories

                                  ICQ: 397892500

                                  Comment

                                  • NTSS
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Mar 2005
                                    • 5688

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by AlienQ


                                    Yes you read that right.



                                    Soon none of you will mind a bar code on your arm.

                                    You can still be a pimp.
                                    Stick that racist symbol up your ass
                                    ICQ: 150-803-430
                                    Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

                                    Comment

                                    • alexg
                                      IL4L.com
                                      • Aug 2003
                                      • 11287

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Babagirls
                                      it would make more sense to allow ONLY .kids sites rather than filter out EVERY domain except .kids & make us switch to .xxx
                                      not really. kids shouldn't ONLY be allowed to access cartoon sites.
                                      what if kids search for information on the internet?

                                      Find fuck buddies in your area!

                                      Comment

                                      • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                        best designer on GFY
                                        • Mar 2003
                                        • 30307

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by NTSS
                                        Stick that racist symbol up your ass

                                        You should change your NICK handle to "Naive"

                                        Comment

                                        • GatorB
                                          The Demon & 12clicks
                                          • Oct 2001
                                          • 18208

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by alexg
                                          not really. kids shouldn't ONLY be allowed to access cartoon sites.
                                          what if kids search for information on the internet?
                                          And us adult should have to have the internet dumbed down so it's safe for 5 years olds. The original internet was for use by ADULTS( not for pornogrpahy purposes of course but still ADULT use only )

                                          Comment

                                          Working...