Making a picture 2257 compliant .. would this work? - GoFuckYourself.com

Machete_ · 06-13-2005, 06:48 AM

no - people can still se whats is going on

basschick · 06-13-2005, 06:49 AM

no. 2257 is not about censoring in any way.

Mack · 06-13-2005, 06:51 AM

A picture is either requires docs or it doesn't . You can not alter or crop an image into "compliance" . weather a photo requires doc's or not is based upon the original photo.

Trixxxia · 06-13-2005, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack

A picture is either requires docs or it doesn't . You can not alter or crop an image into "compliance" . weather a photo requires doc's or not is based upon the original photo.

What he said. My question is this though - doesn't anyone think that although the pics are compliant - boobs yes, genitals no - how do you prove it's not been cropped when they're in your office and you haven't received any docs for it? Are we trusting that they would know?

Trixxxia · 06-13-2005, 07:02 AM

To late to edit the other post - here's my re-worded question::
My question is this though - how can we trust that they will be able to tell the difference between a cropped pic and an original?

On pics with say, boobs yes and genitals no - who's to say that they will not ask for documents of those pics and we won't have any to show them? Also, what proof do you have that the original image has not been cropped at all from the original?

a1ka1ine · 06-13-2005, 09:15 AM

maybe they will ask to see the negatives

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 06-13-2005, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebus_dk

no - people can still se whats is going on

Allah Ackbar!!!

Terry · 06-13-2005, 09:17 AM

Thats just it, you need docs for every pic (set). No docs, no compliance.

bigdog · 06-13-2005, 09:27 AM

hey whatever happend to the viking paysite affilate program?

biskoppen · 06-13-2005, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog

hey whatever happend to the viking paysite affilate program?

Yeah, it's a good question.. it drowned in way too many new projects and idea we had to realize first .. and still are working on

06-13-2005, 06:46 AM	#1
biskoppen Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Very small penis Posts: 5,809	Making a picture 2257 compliant .. would this work? __________________ Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here

06-13-2005, 06:49 AM	#3
basschick Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: el lay, ca usa Posts: 2,540	no. 2257 is not about censoring in any way. __________________ Got Gay and For Women Traffic?

06-13-2005, 09:17 AM	#9
Terry Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,604	Thats just it, you need docs for every pic (set). No docs, no compliance. __________________ TengaCash ICQ: 6776764

06-13-2005, 06:48 AM	#2
Machete_ WINNING! Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 14,579	no - people can still se whats is going on

06-13-2005, 06:51 AM	#4
Mack Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 1,017	A picture is either requires docs or it doesn't . You can not alter or crop an image into "compliance" . weather a photo requires doc's or not is based upon the original photo.

06-13-2005, 07:02 AM	#6
Trixxxia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 5,600	To late to edit the other post - here's my re-worded question:: My question is this though - how can we trust that they will be able to tell the difference between a cropped pic and an original? On pics with say, boobs yes and genitals no - who's to say that they will not ask for documents of those pics and we won't have any to show them? Also, what proof do you have that the original image has not been cropped at all from the original?

06-13-2005, 09:15 AM	#7
a1ka1ine Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 3,387	maybe they will ask to see the negatives

06-13-2005, 09:27 AM	#10
bigdog Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 6,964	hey whatever happend to the viking paysite affilate program?