2257 Exempt Image??? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

S P A N N O W · 06-09-2005, 06:18 PM

BwaHahahahaha!!!!!!

Buddy · 06-09-2005, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S P A N N O W

BwaHahahahaha!!!!!!

You know sometimes I miss being one of the gang

S P A N N O W · 06-09-2005, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buddy

You know sometimes I miss being one of the gang

You'll always be one of the gang bro!!!

darnit · 06-09-2005, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX

the ignorance in this thread on the new (and old) 2257 laws is amazing

if you have a womans face cropped out of a picture, and the original picture was deemed sexually explicit, THAN YOU MUST HAVE DOCS FOR THE THUMB....even if it is just a crop out of the face

Agreed but what about the original SET?

If you use the first softcore pic but the set is hardcore - what then?

It seems no one can agree on this one.

<Armchair laywers discuss>

Machete_ · 06-09-2005, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3piece chicken Dinner

I think a whole lot of people need to change the way they are looking at things.

On purpose or by mistake you used the phrase "workaround" most people are stuck in this "workaround" mindset.

IMHO I think we would all be best suited to get in a " Work within" mindset.
We all need to work within the parameters that our lawyers have advised us.

If you are one of what I suspect to be dozens of webmasters. ( tgp, mgp, freesites ect..) that do not have your own legal counsel. I would do my best to error on the side of caution, and stop trying to talk yourself into something that is fringe. And for gods sake be very careful listening to the " GFY crack legal posting team" who themselves have not consulted a lawyer and have done their best to review the new regulations and figure it out. I am very worried for some of you trying to justify things you know will put you at a higher risk. But I guess someone has got to get busted first. Better to get a clarification of the laws on your dime not mine i suppose.

ooohhh.. I sure do have legal advise, and they told me to not waste my time with it. We are based in denmark, we host in danmark, and most of our stuff is in danish - so it does not really apply to us, unless our partners requier it. That is why I have it writing from all our major partners, if it apply to our joint venture, or not...

And if you go back to the beginnig of all thise 2257 post, I was one of theose that said "get proff help" and i still do...

but I do take et VERY seriously, even if it does not look like it.

octo1997 · 06-09-2005, 07:02 PM

I'm a sick fuck. Didn't you know?

Pleasurepays · 06-09-2005, 07:04 PM

^^^^^^

retard

octo1997 · 06-09-2005, 07:19 PM

^^^^^^^^^
Why?

S P A N N O W · 06-09-2005, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by octo1997

^^^^^^^^^
Why?

On thin ice...

Jace · 06-09-2005, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darnit

Agreed but what about the original SET?

If you use the first softcore pic but the set is hardcore - what then?

It seems no one can agree on this one.

<Armchair laywers discuss>

the way it was explained to me, it is a picture by picture basis....

if you have 500 pictures, starting with clothed and slowly working from softcore to hardcore, and you only use the softcore pics...then technically it isn't a hardcore set standing from what you published

SleazyDream · 06-10-2005, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell

Jesus Christ am I the only guy that wishes threads had a little drama image on the front page? I just happened into this and can't believe what I'm reading.

Brad

i was totally stunned reading this thread - really BAD turn in here.

emthree · 06-10-2005, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream

i was totally stunned reading this thread - really BAD turn in here.

@

AaronM · 06-10-2005, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missy

Dude... that's one scary looking dog you got there. Does it bite?

No, all it does is follow you around and try to hump your leg.

It's about as worthless as it's owner.

Blackrose · 06-10-2005, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FilthyRob

could be bird shit... lol

fuck dude, you just caused the cola im drinking go out thru my nose!

thats a good one - you made my day

taibo · 06-10-2005, 05:30 AM

Major (Tom) · 06-10-2005, 06:03 AM

no its not compliant.. in my opinion.. and I doubt you would find an attorney willing to state that either for fear possible litigation telling you it is. The attorneys dont know themselves yet. So they arent giving out any catergorical advice. Right now they are speaking in parables so if you get pinched they have an out. Unfortunatley we will need more clarification from the doj or some prosecutions to explain it further.

Duke

NETbilling · 06-10-2005, 09:36 AM

That is just wrong!

Mitch

SmokeyTheBear · 06-10-2005, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NetBilling

That is just wrong!

Mitch

huh ????

MaDalton · 06-10-2005, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

No, all it does is follow you around and try to hump your leg.

It's about as worthless as it's owner.

ouch....

Missy · 06-10-2005, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

It's about as worthless as it's owner.

Just out of curiosity... have you ever even met this dog?

jayeff · 07-19-2005, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX

the way it was explained to me, it is a picture by picture basis....

if you have 500 pictures, starting with clothed and slowly working from softcore to hardcore, and you only use the softcore pics...then technically it isn't a hardcore set standing from what you published

I'm not going to go back to find the original wording relating to this specific point, but it is transparently obvious (and one of the first points my lawyer made) that the intent of the new rules is to ensure that minors are not involved in porn productions. Given that, the key must be the whole photo set and in fact, the whole photo session.

Chance your luck if you like, but in practical terms, selecting softcore pics from a hardcore photoset is no different than cropping a softcore area from a hardcore pic.

Depressingly it seems that several sponsors are already forgetting even the most liberal interpretations. A list of FHG's I got from nubiles.net a couple of days ago was typical of several: although they were all what we might think of as softcore, every single gallery included at least one picture in which the model was plainly touching her genitals. And there was a guy on here today promoting some really excellent galleries, but among all his samples, I couldn't find any which would not require me to have 2257 docs, unless I only used text linking.

I guess it's up to sponsors and submitters if they don't mind limiting themselves to text-only and non-US TGP's, etc. But I also suspect that a lot of free-site operators are likely not noticing the drift back and could get into trouble down the road.

06-09-2005, 06:18 PM	#51
S P A N N O W Everywhere You Wanna Be! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: NorCal Posts: 11,941	BwaHahahahaha!!!!!! __________________ Ambush

06-09-2005, 07:02 PM	#56
octo1997 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 109	I'm a sick fuck. Didn't you know? Last edited by Big Ray; 06-09-2005 at 07:10 PM..

06-10-2005, 06:03 AM	#66
Major (Tom) Boomer Woffen Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 30,590	no its not compliant.. in my opinion.. and I doubt you would find an attorney willing to state that either for fear possible litigation telling you it is. The attorneys dont know themselves yet. So they arent giving out any catergorical advice. Right now they are speaking in parables so if you get pinched they have an out. Unfortunatley we will need more clarification from the doj or some prosecutions to explain it further. Duke __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

06-10-2005, 09:36 AM	#67
NETbilling Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Huntington Beach, CA Posts: 8,584	That is just wrong! Mitch __________________ Mitch Farber CEO - NETbilling, Inc. Email / Phone: 888-357-8166 / 661-252-2456 Transaction processing & 24/7 call center services with exceptional rates and flexibility, since 1998!

06-09-2005, 07:04 PM	#57
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	^^^^^^ retard

06-09-2005, 07:19 PM	#58
octo1997 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 109	^^^^^^^^^ Why?

06-10-2005, 05:30 AM	#65
taibo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 3,720